Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Trump officially under investigation


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Trump officially under investigation Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:24:08 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/robert-mueller-donald-trump/index.html

B-b-but Hillary....
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:26:14 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Nuh-uh! Fake news!

And Obama did it.

Fire the Prosecutor!

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:27:46 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
I called this shit when he was still a longshot.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:29:12 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
Remember Trump can pardon Flynn.
He can also shoot someone and everyone will still love him.
He is a god now.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:31:14 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I just opened that on another thread and was asked if I wanted to shoot repubs, then told it was fake news, but he doesnt seem to be able to come up with anything to debunk it, so its
gonna be hillary and obama till the next hearing. Oh and only rabid lefties and mooselambs shoot people...we all did it or want to.
miaowwwwwwwww


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:36:54 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
Yeah I just noticed that... but your thread title didn't contain the satisfying sense of the leftist socialist communists having been vindicated.

Trump is now being investigated personally. It unfortunately doesn't mean the nightmare will end soon, but it's a start.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/14/2017 7:57:54 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2351
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Nuh-uh! Fake news!

And Obama did it.

Fire the Prosecutor!


B-b-b-but the investigation is tainted. It is Mueller! And he hired Democratic donors! The horror!

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 3:31:38 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
For weeks now, the orange disaster's cheer squads have been parroting "The President is NOT under investigation" as though this simple fact was a complete exoneration and affirmation of everything that this hapless Administration has managed to achieve (or more accurately, managed to NOT achieve) to date.

Now after determined and repeated efforts by the orange disaster himself, the President finds himself under investigation for obstruction of justice, an impeachable offense. This would have to be a body blow to our heroic far right cheer squads, who have so much invested, both emotionally and politically, in the orange disaster not being the subject of an investigation. Perhaps this explains their absence from this thread, an unusual absence as their contibutions to Trump-related threads are notable for their number and aggressive tone (note: intelligent content is absent, it's not a quality ever associated with RW cheer squads).

Obviously it's all fake news invented by the pinko alt left media in their fanatical pursuit of the disaster prone billionaire ... not a shred of truth in it, nor will it ever come to the courts, and if it does he's innocent and only did in self defence anyways .... can he plead the Fifth?

_____________________________



(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 4:16:36 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
RISCH: I remember, you talked with us shortly after February 14th, when the "New York Times" wrote an article that suggested that the trump campaign was colluding with the Russians. Do you remember reading that article when it first came out?

COMEY: I do, it was about allegedly extensive electronic surveillance in their communications.

RISCH: Correct. That upset you to the point where you surveyed the intelligence community to see whether you were missing something in that. Is that correct?

COMEY: That's correct. I want to be careful in open setting, but —

RISCH: I'm not going to go any further than that, so thank you. In addition to that, after that, you sought out both Republican and Democrat senators to tell them that, hey, I don't know where this is coming from, but this is not the case. This is not factual. Do you recall that?

COMEY: Yes.

RISCH: Okay. So again, so the American people can understand this, that report by the New York Times was not true. Is that a fair statement?

COMEY: In the main, it was not true. And again, all of you know this. Maybe the American people don't. The challenge, and I'm not picking on reporters about writing stories about classified information, is the people talking about it often don't really know what's going on, and going on are not talking about it. We don't call the press to say, hey, you don't that thing wrong about the sensitive topic. We have to leave it there.

I mentioned to the chairman the nonsense around what influenced me to make the July 5th statement. Nonsense. But I can't go explaining how it is nonsense.

RISCH: Thank you. All right. So those three things we now know regarding the active measures, whether the president is under investigation and the collusion between the trump campaign and the Russians. I want to drill right down, as my time is limited, to the most recent dust up regarding allegations that the president of the United States obstructed justice. Boy, you nailed this down on page 5, paragraph 3. You put this in quotes. Words matter. You wrote down the words so we can all have the words in front of us now. There's 28 words now in quotes. It says, quote, I hope -- this is the president speaking — I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is good guy. I hope you can let this go. Now, those are his exact words, is that correct.

COMEY: Correct.

RISCH: You wrote them here and put them in quotes.

COMEY: Correct.

RISCH: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go?

COMEY: Not in his words, no.

RISCH: He did not order you to let it go?

COMEY: Again, those words are not an order.

RISCH: He said, I hope. Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases, charging people with criminal offenses and, of course, you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or, for that matter, any other criminal offense, where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?

COMEY: I don't know well enough to answer. The reason I keep saying his words is I took it as a direction.

RISCH: Right.

COMEY: I mean, this is a president of the United States with me alone saying I hope this. I took it as, this is what he wants me to do. I didn't obey that, but that's the way I took it.

RISCH: You may have taken it as a direction but that's not what he said.

COMEY: Correct.

RISCH: He said, I hope.

COMEY: Those are his exact words, correct.

RISCH: You don't know of anyone ever being charged for hoping something, is that a fair statement?

COMEY: I don't as I sit here.

...

SEN. MARCO RUBIO: Director Comey, the meeting in the oval office where he made the request about Mike Flynn, was that only time he asked you to hopefully let it go?

COMEY: Yes.

RUBIO: And in that meeting, as you understood it, he was asking not about the general Russia investigation, he was asking specifically about the jeopardy that Flynn was in himself?

COMEY: That's how I understood it. Yes, sir.

RUBIO: As you perceived it, while he hoped you did away with it, you perceived it as an order, given the setting, the position and some of the circumstances?

COMEY: Yes.

RUBIO: At the time, did you say something to the president about, that is not an appropriate request, or did you tell the white house counsel, it's not an appropriate request? Someone needs to tell the president he can't do these things.

COMEY: I didn't, no.

RUBIO: Why?

COMEY: I don't know. I think — as I said earlier, I think the circumstances were such that it was — I was a bit stunned and didn't have the presence of mind. I don't know. I don't want to make you sound like I'm captain courageous. I don't know if I would have said to the president with the presence of mind, sir, that's wrong. In the moment, it didn't come to my mind. What came to my mind is be careful what you say. I said, I agree Flynn is a good guy.

RUBIO: On the cloud, we keep talking about this cloud, you perceive the cloud to be the Russian investigation in general?

COMEY: Yes, sir.

RUBIO: His specific ask was you'd tell the American people what you'd told him, told the leaders of Congress, Democrats and Republicans, he was not personally under investigation?

COMEY: Yes, sir.

RUBIO: What he was asking you to do, would you have done here today?

COMEY: Correct. Yes, sir.

RUBIO: Again, at that setting, did you say to the president, it would be inappropriate for you to do so and then talk to the White House counsel or somebody so hopefully they'd talked to him and tell him he couldn't do this?

COMEY: First time I said, I'll see what we can do. Second time, I explained how it should work, that the White House counsel should contact the deputy attorney general.

RUBIO: You told him that?

COMEY: The president said, okay. I think that's what I'll do.

RUBIO: To be clear, for you to make a public statement that he was not under investigation wouldn't be illegal but you felt it could potentially create a duty to correct if circumstances changed?

COMEY: Yes, sir. We wrestled with it before my testimony, where I confirmed that there was an investigation. There were two primary concerns. One was it creates a duty to correct, which I've lived before, and you want to be very careful about doing that. And second, it is a slippery slope. If we say the president and the vice president aren't under investigation. What is the principled investigation for stopping? So the leaderrship, at justice, acting attorney general Boente said, you're not going to do that.

RUBIO: On March 30th during the phone call about general Flynn, you said he abruptly shifted and brought up something that you call, quote, unquote, the McCabe thing. Specifically, the Mccabe thing as you understood it was that Mccabe's wife had received campaign money from what I assume means Terry McAuliffe?

COMEY: Yes.

RUBIO: Close to the Clintons. Did he say, I don't like this guy because he got money from someone close to Clinton?

COMEY: He asked me about McCabe and said, how is he going to be with me as president? I was rough on him on the campaign trail.

RUBIO: Rough on Mccabe?

COMEY: By his own account, he said he was rough on McCabe and Mrs. McCabe on the campaign trail. How is he going to be? I shared with the president, Andy is a pro. No issue at all. You have to know people of the FBI. They're not —

RUBIO: So the president turns to you and says, remember, I never brought up the McCabe thing because you said he was a good guy, did you perceive that to be a statement that, I took care of you. I didn't do something because you told me he was a good guy. So I'm asking you potentially for something in return. Is that how you perceived it?

COMEY: I wasn't sure what to make of it. That's possible. It was so out of context I didn't have a clear view of what it was.

RUBIO: On a number of occasions here, you bring up — let's talk about the general Russia investigation, OK? Page 6 of your testimony you say, the first thing you say is, he asked what we could do to, quote, unquote, lift the cloud, the general Russia investigation, you responded, we are investigating the matter as quickly as we could and there would be great benefit if we didn't find anything for having done the work well. He agreed. He emphasized the problems it was causing him. He agreed it'd be great to have an investigation, all the facts came out and we found nothing. He agreed that would be ideal, but this cloud is still messing up my ability to do the rest of my agenda. Is that an accurate assessment?

COMEY: Yes, sir. He went farther than that. He said, and if some of my satellites did something wrong, it'd be good to find that out.

RUBIO: That is the second part. The satellites, if one of my satellites, I imagine he meant some of the people surrounding his campaign, did something wrong, it'd be great to know that, as well.

COMEY: Yes, sir. That's what he said.

RUBIO: Are those the only two instances in which that back and forth happened, where the president was basically saying, and I'm paraphrasing here, it's okay. Do the Russia investigation. I hope it all comes out. I have nothing to do with anything Russia. It'd be great if it all came out, people around me were doing things that were wrong?

COMEY: Yes. As I recorded it accurately there. That was the sentiment he was expressing. Yes, sir.

RUBIO: What it comes down to is the president asked three things of you. Asked for your loyalty. You said you'd be loyally honest.

COMEY: Honestly loyal.

RUBIO: Honestly loyal. He asked you on one occasion to let the Mike Flynn thing go because he was a good guy. By the way, you're aware he said the same thing in the press the next day. He is a good guy, treated unfairly, etc. I imagine your FBI agents read that.

COMEY: I'm sure they did.

RUBIO: The president's wishes were known to them, certainly by the next day when he had a press conference with the prime minister. Going back, the three requests were, number one, be loyal. Number two, let the Mike Flynn thing go. He is a good guy, been treated unfairly. Number three, can you please tell the American people what these leaders in congress already know, which you already know and what you told me three times, that I'm not under personally under investigation.

COMEY: That's right.

RUBIO: We learn more from the newspaper sometimes than the open hearings. Do you ever wonder why, of all the things in the investigation, the only thing never leaked is the fact the president was never personally under investigation, despite the fact that Democrats and Republicans and the leadership of congress have known that for weeks?

COMEY: I don't know. I find matters that are briefed to the gang of eight are pretty tightly held, in my experience.

RUBIO: Finally, who are those senior leaders at the FBI you share these conversations with?

COMEY: As I said in response to Sen. Feinstein's question, deputy director, my chief of staff, general counsel, deputy director’s chief counse and then, more often than not, the number three person at the FBI, the associate deputy director. And quite often, head of the national security branch.

...

COTTON: On February 14th the New York Times published the story, the headline of which was “Trump campaign aides had repeated contacts with Russian intelligence.” You were asked if that as an inaccurate story. Would it be fair to characterize that story as almost entirely wrong?

COMEY: Yes.

COTON: Do you have — at the time the story was published, any indication of any contact between Trump people and Russians, intelligence officers, other government officials or close associates of the Russian government?

COMEY: That's one I can't answer sitting here.

COTTON: We can discuss that in the classified setting then. I want to turn your attention now to Mr. Flynn. The allegations of his underlying conduct to be specific. His alleged interactions with the Russian ambassador on the telephone and then what he said to senior Trump administration officials and Department of Justice officials. I understand there are other issues with Mr. Flynn related to his receipt of foreign monies or disclosure ever official advocacy, those are serious allegations that I'm sure will be pursued but I want to speak specifically about his interactions with the Russian ambassador. There's a story on January 23rd in The Washington Post that says, entitled “FBI reviewed calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit.” Is this story accurate?

COMEY: I don't want to comment ton that senator. I'm pretty sure the bureau has not confirmed any interception of communications. So, I don't want to talk about that in an opening setting.

COTTON: Would it be improper for an incoming national security advisor to have a conversation with a foreign ambassador?

COMEY: In my experience, no.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/08/full-text-james-comey-trump-russia-testimony-239295

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 4:20:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
can you answer sitting here, Felchgobbler Gobbles?
You think you are helping your case, old, fat, putinjizz gobbling nutsucker compound gimp?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 4:34:08 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LOL whats the point of that wall of testimony?
Sounds like he is mansplaining something with a flaccid point
Motion to rename "mansplaining" to "correctile dysfunction"


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 4:43:42 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline


_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:03:01 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/robert-mueller-donald-trump/index.html

B-b-but Hillary....


CNN issues correction after Comey statement contradicts reporting

So much fake news...

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:04:33 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL whats the point of that wall of testimony?
Sounds like he is mansplaining something with a flaccid point
Motion to rename "mansplaining" to "correctile dysfunction"



You're too stupid to see it? No surprise there

Your insane troll posse knows there's something there worth spewing their standard mindless stupidity over

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:08:34 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I am torn between wanting him strung up, birched first obviously, and him to fire Mueller just for a laugh eh!

And now we all know why Comrade Rasputin Trumpcunt and his enabling minions have been seeding the press the last few days with - oooo he it could sack Mueller, you know.

What a corrupt Obstructionist fuk
Obstructionist - which is one of his new buzz words

Still over to dumfuk cock wombles twitter account to see his rebuttal at these outrageous slurs on his fine lying fuk of a character
They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice
3:55 am - 15 Jun 2017

You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people!
4:57 am - 15 Jun 2017

I will wager you he starts flapping more and more bosconian style as the day grows old. If his hands were bigger he might actually take off.
He will obviously need his drool bib for the coming tirade.


Trump had received private assurances from then-FBI Director James B. Comey starting in January that he was not personally under investigation. Officials say that changed shortly after Comey’s firing.

Five people briefed on the interview requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy, and it is unclear how many others have been questioned by the FBI.

The latest reports also speak of an investigation into possible money laundering among Trump associates. hehehe

At a Senate panel last week, Mr Coats and Admiral Rogers declined to answer questions about conversations with the president, but said that they had never felt pressured to interfere in investigations.

The Washington Post says the three have agreed to be interviewed by investigators and the questioning could happen as early as this week.

The three were not involved in the Trump campaign but may be asked whether Mr Trump sought their help to end the Flynn inquiry.

A separate Washington Post report has said that Mr Coats told associates in March that the president had asked him to try to get the FBI to back off.

However, the Times points out that the latest questioning does not mean a criminal case is being built against the president, simply that information is being gathered by the FBI. It will be passed to prosecutors who will then have to decide.

Has the president responded?
He tweeted early on Thursday morning, saying: "They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice."

His legal team responded angrily on Wednesday evening about the leaked information.

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Mr Trump's lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, said: "The FBI leak of information regarding the president is outrageous, inexcusable and illegal."

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 6/15/2017 5:15:41 AM >


_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:13:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL whats the point of that wall of testimony?
Sounds like he is mansplaining something with a flaccid point
Motion to rename "mansplaining" to "correctile dysfunction"



You're too stupid to see it? No surprise there

Your insane troll posse knows there's something there worth spewing their standard mindless stupidity over


Considering I pointed that out only the other day(minus rubios blather)
Of course I know what it is about you dickhole


By the way, you never answered my question on this....http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5043513

why is that?



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:16:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/robert-mueller-donald-trump/index.html

B-b-but Hillary....


CNN issues correction after Comey statement contradicts reporting

So much fake news...

OY Stupid.
Heavy Blinkers link goes to todays news.!
Your link goes to story from a 8 days ago!
06/07/17 10:30 PM EDT
fucking moron


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:18:48 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/robert-mueller-donald-trump/index.html

B-b-but Hillary....


CNN issues correction after Comey statement contradicts reporting

So much fake news...

OY Stupid.
Heavy Blinkers link goes to todays news.!
Your link goes to story from a 8 days ago!
06/07/17 10:30 PM EDT
fucking moron



Oh, it was a whole eight days ago since they were last caught pushing fake news

That really matters in your cartoon world, too - I can tell

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 5:26:29 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
a correction isnt fake news.

where is your news coming from. LMAO
try to be relevant.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Trump officially under investigation - 6/15/2017 7:05:57 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Oh, it was a whole eight days ago since they were last caught pushing fake news

That really matters in your cartoon world, too - I can tell


Even FOX news has reluctantly buried the story among all of the BS about liberals everywhere being to blame for the shooting at the GOP baseball practice:

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2017/06/15/mueller-probe-examining-whether-donald-trump-obstructed-justice.html

Are you gonna cry?

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Trump officially under investigation Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109