What are the odds

What are the odds (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BoscoX -> What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:26:27 AM)
She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results.

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:39:05 AM)
Yahoo had 212,000 results. That's funny, I got 809,000 results on google. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=loretta+lynch&spf=1498563493376 What are the odds you could be making shit up?[:D]

BoscoX -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:42:21 AM)
You are far too stupid to manage the difficult task of clicking on the link provided then...

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:51:56 AM)
I did and it appears that you fucked up producing the link..................or you're just outright falsifying things. As you have already been proven multiple times to be a liar, I'd tend toward the latter. https://www.google.com/search?q=Lor%D0%B5tta+Lynch&oq=Lor%D0%B5tta+Lynch&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Lor%D0%B5tta+Lynch&tbm=nws Oh lookie. I was right. The above is your link which points.........NOWHERE Mine actually uses Google.com. liar

HaveRopeWillBind -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:55:14 AM)
Or most of the search results will be about the Country-Western singer with the same name, spelled the same, and considerably more fame.

Musicmystery -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:57:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results. Didn't you go on about how being called to testify -- like Jeff Sessions -- didn't mean he was under investigation? Your goal posts have wheels on them. You're going to break your neck following this relentless D and R spin at every turn.

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:57:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind Or most of the search results will be about the Country-Western singer with the same name, spelled the same, and considerably more fame. Loretta LYNN does not have the same name as Loretta LYNCH. Where do they find these fucking morons?

WickedsDesire -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 4:59:37 AM)
The Republican ghettos'?

Termyn8or -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:41:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results. Didn't you go on about how being called to testify -- like Jeff Sessions -- didn't mean he was under investigation? Your goal posts have wheels on them. You're going to break your neck following this relentless D and R spin at every turn. Look who's talking. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:43:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind Or most of the search results will be about the Country-Western singer with the same name, spelled the same, and considerably more fame. Loretta LYNN does not have the same name as Loretta LYNCH. Where do they find these fucking morons? Liberals. (you should see their math skills if you want a good laugh) T^T

Musicmystery -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:44:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results. Didn't you go on about how being called to testify -- like Jeff Sessions -- didn't mean he was under investigation? Your goal posts have wheels on them. You're going to break your neck following this relentless D and R spin at every turn. Look who's talking. T^T Sorry, but no. I've no use for either major party.

BoscoX -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:45:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results. Didn't you go on about how being called to testify -- like Jeff Sessions -- didn't mean he was under investigation? Your goal posts have wheels on them. You're going to break your neck following this relentless D and R spin at every turn. Still building straw men and relying on ad hominems for every argument, I see Childish

Musicmystery -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:47:46 AM)
If you want to characterize your own posts and your own words that way, whatever. But if you can't even stand by your own words, there goes what little credibility you had. Just a ranting idiot whose points change direction with the wind.

BoscoX -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:54:21 AM)
More of the same [:D] Back to the topic - Drudge right now: EU SLAPS GOOGLE WITH RECORD $2.7B FINE MANIPULATORS OF SEARCH A N T I T R U S T http://www.drudgereport.com/

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:54:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind Or most of the search results will be about the Country-Western singer with the same name, spelled the same, and considerably more fame. Loretta LYNN does not have the same name as Loretta LYNCH. Where do they find these fucking morons? Liberals. (you should see their math skills if you want a good laugh) T^T Sorry Term, but the person we are referring to here is a supposed conservative.

Musicmystery -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:57:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX She is under investigation for possible obstruction but Google news search results has never heard of her? Your search - Loretta Lynch - did not match any news results. Well, don't post pretend results, and you'll get all kinds of links for Loretta Lynch: https://www.google.com/search?q=Loretta+Lynch&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 About 868,000 results.

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 5:58:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX More of the same [:D] Back to the topic - Drudge right now: EU SLAPS GOOGLE WITH RECORD $2.7B FINE MANIPULATORS OF SEARCH A N T I T R U S T http://www.drudgereport.com/ Actually, this has nothing to do with the topic of your made up lie about Google trying to support Democrats. This post is about Google manipulating searches to favor its own aps and services to Android phone owners. yaknow.......Capitalism

BoscoX -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 6:27:10 AM)
You're also far too stupid to click on the link in the op... [:D]

WickedsDesire -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 6:37:37 AM)
Your search - Lorеtta Lynch - did not match any "news" results. I tend to use theses tabs -button all or images "News" Trump Liar About 431,000 results (0.47 seconds)

Hillwilliam -> RE: What are the odds (6/27/2017 6:42:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX You're also far too stupid to click on the link in the op... [:D] I clicked the link in the OP and reproduced it in post #4 by copy and past to clipboard and then here. It's a made up lie. You are far too stupid to realize someone was bound to do that.[sm=lol.gif] What are the odds that someone could post such a bald faced lie and no one pick up on it?

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875