Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 12:23:22 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
You lack the capacity to understand opacity

Who controls the world - dunno

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 12:24:54 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Control and Influence are different. Not necessary mutually exclusive.

Well, Steve Bannon controls that Idiot American President. Therefore you would need to examine who is whispering in Bannon's ear.
Pruit and Tillerson are controlled by their respective business interests

I would also go with who sits on whose board - Remember many of these people are mere stooges-puppets-family-relations-friends-cronynism-nepotism-pawns etc

Well if one cannot influence, one...does not control.

Don't tell me, tell the shitweasel in the white house.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 12:51:33 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Control and Influence are different. Not necessary mutually exclusive.

Well, Steve Bannon controls that Idiot American President. Therefore you would need to examine who is whispering in Bannon's ear.
Pruit and Tillerson are controlled by their respective business interests

I would also go with who sits on whose board - Remember many of these people are mere stooges-puppets-family-relations-friends-cronynism-nepotism-pawns etc

Well if one cannot influence, one...does not control.

Don't tell me, tell the shitweasel in the white house.

Actually, I was telling WD

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 12:58:24 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I am here what were you telling me? Is that you MrR or WM who is asking me?

I told you all Bannon controls America - now who controls him?

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 1:26:34 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.

I agree and so assume quite a bit of not only cross-ownership but also cross management, as in being on many BDs. of Directors but when 730 stockholders own 80% of the world's economy, I begin to think within that group are a few very powerful interests that can be working together not only on propaganda, but also on policy and law and we see the why and how of such inequality in the west.


I expect they socialize in the same circles, even holidaying together etc.. so they dont really need to be on the Board to have influence/control over the Board.

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 1:32:05 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.


So you want to sell that their having a money monopoly is not good enough to establish the fact? Seriously?





Where did I say that?

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 1:33:53 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.

I agree and so assume quite a bit of not only cross-ownership but also cross management, as in being on many BDs. of Directors but when 730 stockholders own 80% of the world's economy, I begin to think within that group are a few very powerful interests that can be working together not only on propaganda, but also on policy and law and we see the why and how of such inequality in the west.


I expect they socialize in the same circles, even holidaying together etc.. so they dont really need to be on the Board to have influence/control over the Board.

That seems a desperate reach into conspiracy by you.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 1:41:05 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.

I agree and so assume quite a bit of not only cross-ownership but also cross management, as in being on many BDs. of Directors but when 730 stockholders own 80% of the world's economy, I begin to think within that group are a few very powerful interests that can be working together not only on propaganda, but also on policy and law and we see the why and how of such inequality in the west.


I expect they socialize in the same circles, even holidaying together etc.. so they dont really need to be on the Board to have influence/control over the Board.

That seems a desperate reach into conspiracy by you.


ummm.. no.. isnt some business done on the golf course & things like that?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 2:00:15 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Are you all thick?

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/4/2017 6:52:34 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
Are you all thick?

As a brick.

Really don't mind if you sit this one out
My word's but a whisper your deafness a SHOUT
I may make you feel but I can't make you think
Your sperm's in the gutter your love's in the sink



_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 9:05:57 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.


So you want to sell that their having a money monopoly is not good enough to establish the fact? Seriously?





Where did I say that?



You ASSUME a necessity for intertwined boards of directors, which of course is a total fallacy, the mafia needs no overt corporate structure to operate precisely like one. They turned up dead, just like the 49 bankers that just happened to commit suicide. Dont have to look beyond ones nose to to realize the connection, but some people need confessions signed in blood before they are capable of connecting the dots


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 9:10:24 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
One documentary has one banker who says quite clearly that there are about 8500 bankers world-wide that operate and control the world through their deals converting cash at the BIS. The Bank of International Settlements.

The only way Saddam got any cash...Iran would get any of their cash. The same holds true for terrorists and their sponsors.

Now, why again do we have all of these problems ? The bankers...that's why.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 9:24:15 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

The importance of the gold standard was to cap inflation by force of an empty gas tank, of course what the rothschild keyensians did was to replace a self sustaining system with play monopoly money by causing wars and running debt up beyond the total value of all the gold and planet and then pretend it was impossible to increase the value of gold. Long story short now we have the liquidity during deflationary periods with near worthless money that has no intrinsic value.



You and others keep saying this and while it is supposed to be text book, it is in these moderns times when the creed of greed in the capitalist invents new paper to push, and in the buyers greed, get over-leveraged to buy even more, (currently happening with hedge funds) then with the fed and taxpayers forced to stand by, we need to get creative...and we did.

So now we still have the bellwether US dollar that in fact has not suffered hyperinflation and they can play this paper-profit game over and over again. That is the power of these bankers that we have seen right before our eyes and now for 11 years. The intrinsic value of the US dollar is not only still 97-98% of its value this time last year but is still the guarantor of $1 worth of quality enhanced labor.



Last year? Fuck last year!
People dont save money for a single fucking year!
They save it over the course of a lifetime.
That same devaluation centered on money is applied to EVERYTHING.
The people on the top of the pyramid are capable of moving and manipulating assets far outside the average joe blow who is limited to the bank, stock market or a tin can.

I did a pv once on this very board to demonstrate how a million dollars put in a bank in 1933 and untouched till 2007 then withdrawn winds up being only 400,000 after deducting taxes and inflation, without the need for any new paper!

Had it been gold it would have increased from 1 million to about 20 million.

The banking system is designed to rob you blind and transfer the money that has ZERO intrinsic value up the pyramid.

I once called the IRS and asked them where the hell I can deduct inflation.... want to guess their answer?





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 9:34:27 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Further untangling the web of ownership, what's found is that much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147

Rodgers, this is an interesting parlour game, I suppose, but having shareholders in common seems a weak criteria for presuming power relationships. I think you would have to look toward intertwined Boards of Directors to imagine a power conspiracy. jmo.

I agree and so assume quite a bit of not only cross-ownership but also cross management, as in being on many BDs. of Directors but when 730 stockholders own 80% of the world's economy, I begin to think within that group are a few very powerful interests that can be working together not only on propaganda, but also on policy and law and we see the why and how of such inequality in the west.


I expect they socialize in the same circles, even holidaying together etc.. so they dont really need to be on the Board to have influence/control over the Board.

That seems a desperate reach into conspiracy by you.


ummm.. no.. isnt some business done on the golf course & things like that?



yep most of it is because the kids on the top of the pyramid play for keeps, they die if the break the contract.




Give Me Control Of A Nation’s Money…
GE Christenson


“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”


The Federal Reserve and other central banks exercise considerable control over our economies via interest rates, debt creation, QE and more. They create massive profits for the financial industry that in turn purchases many politicians and Presidents.

Now expand the concept into other areas and see if the results ring true.

Give me control of a nation’s financial systems and I shall own the politicians who make the laws.

Print currencies and buy politicians. Same idea – it is easy!

Give me control of the FBI investigators and I can avoid prosecution and indictments.

(Hmmmm. There was something in the news about this recently…)

Give me control of the voting machines and I care not who the voters in the popular election actually wanted.

In Philadelphia in 2012, 59 districts cast 100.0% of their votes for Obama and the voting machines show that not one person cast their vote for Romney. Strange. Amazing. Unusual. It might happen once in the age of the universe, or again this November in Philadelphia. Still, a vote of 19,605 to zero in 59 districts is difficult to believe, even in strongly democratic districts in urban America.

Give me control of the DNC and I care not who the primary voters chose.

(Hmmmm. Ask Bernie Sanders if he agrees.)

Give me control of the media and I will tell the people of the world what I want them to know, but not necessarily the facts.

There is ample evidence that the media has an agenda and promotes certain ideas, regardless of facts. Examples include, “the economy is fine,” “that Presidential candidate is … fill in your favorite accusation,” “unemployment is less than 5% in the US,” “Social Security benefits are guaranteed and the system is solid,” “weapons of mass destruction,” and so many more.

Further, the media can control what is NOT reported as news.

Give me control of the statistics and I can assure the public that unemployment is either high or low, GDP is weak or strong, violent crime is getting better or worse, drug abuse is mild or extreme, illegal aliens are sneaking into the country or leaving, gang violence is becoming worse or better, or whatever is needed …

Lies, damned lies and statistics!

Give me control of the Fort Knox gold and Americans can rest assured that no gold will be reported missing and there is no need for an audit.

This country is based upon STFU and pay up, we the overlords have control.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 2:22:29 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Not the jews?
I thought you were sure that the zionist conspiracy controlled everything.



and you still are foolish enough to think that all zionists are jews, or all jews are zionists. idjit

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 3:07:10 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Not the jews?
I thought you were sure that the zionist conspiracy controlled everything.



and you still are foolish enough to think that all zionists are jews, or all jews are zionists. idjit

All Israelis are jews (the Palestinians clearly don't count as Israelis). Who are the uncut zionists?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 3:17:27 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
who said anything about israel? oh yeh you did!

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 3:22:10 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

who said anything about israel? oh yeh you did!

Define a zionist.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/5/2017 3:33:57 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

The Top 100 Things I'd Do
If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord

My Legions of Terror will have helmets with clear plexiglass visors, not face-concealing ones.

My ventilation ducts will be too small to crawl through.

My noble half-brother whose throne I usurped will be killed, not kept anonymously imprisoned in a forgotten cell of my dungeon.

Shooting is not too good for my enemies.

The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.

I will not gloat over my enemies' predicament before killing them.

When I've captured my adversary and he says, "Look, before you kill me, will you at least tell me what this is all about?" I'll say, "No." and shoot him. No, on second thought I'll shoot him then say "No."

After I kidnap the beautiful princess, we will be married immediately in a quiet civil ceremony, not a lavish spectacle in three weeks' time during which the final phase of my plan will be carried out.

I will not include a self-destruct mechanism unless absolutely necessary. If it is necessary, it will not be a large red button labelled "Danger: Do Not Push". The big red button marked "Do Not Push" will instead trigger a spray of bullets on anyone stupid enough to disregard it. Similarly, the ON/OFF switch will not clearly be labelled as such.

I will not interrogate my enemies in the inner sanctum -- a small hotel well outside my borders will work just as well.

I will be secure in my superiority. Therefore, I will feel no need to prove it by leaving clues in the form of riddles or leaving my weaker enemies alive to show they pose no threat.

One of my advisors will be an average five-year-old child. Any flaws in my plan that he is able to spot will be corrected before implementation.

All slain enemies will be cremated, or at least have several rounds of ammunition emptied into them, not left for dead at the bottom of the cliff. The announcement of their deaths, as well as any accompanying celebration, will be deferred until after the aforementioned disposal.

The hero is not entitled to a last kiss, a last cigarette, or any other form of last request.

I will never employ any device with a digital countdown. If I find that such a device is absolutely unavoidable, I will set it to activate when the counter reaches 117 and the hero is just putting his plan into operation.

I will never utter the sentence "But before I kill you, there's just one thing I want to know."

When I employ people as advisors, I will occasionally listen to their advice.

I will not have a son. Although his laughably under-planned attempt to usurp power would easily fail, it would provide a fatal distraction at a crucial point in time.

I will not have a daughter. She would be as beautiful as she was evil, but one look at the hero's rugged countenance and she'd betray her own father.

Despite its proven stress-relieving effect, I will not indulge in maniacal laughter. When so occupied, it's too easy to miss unexpected developments that a more attentive individual could adjust to accordingly.

I will hire a talented fashion designer to create original uniforms for my Legions of Terror, as opposed to some cheap knock-offs that make them look like Nazi stormtroopers, Roman footsoldiers, or savage Mongol hordes. All were eventually defeated and I want my troops to have a more positive mind-set.

No matter how tempted I am with the prospect of unlimited power, I will not consume any energy field bigger than my head.

I will keep a special cache of low-tech weapons and train my troops in their use. That way -- even if the heroes manage to neutralize my power generator and/or render the standard-issue energy weapons useless -- my troops will not be overrun by a handful of savages armed with spears and rocks.

I will maintain a realistic assessment of my strengths and weaknesses. Even though this takes some of the fun out of the job, at least I will never utter the line "No, this cannot be! I AM INVINCIBLE!!!" (After that, death is usually instantaneous.)

No matter how well it would perform, I will never construct any sort of machinery which is completely indestructible except for one small and virtually inaccessible vulnerable spot.

No matter how attractive certain members of the rebellion are, there is probably someone just as attractive who is not desperate to kill me. Therefore, I will think twice before ordering a prisoner sent to my bedchamber.

I will never build only one of anything important. All important systems will have redundant control panels and power supplies. For the same reason I will always carry at least two fully loaded weapons at all times.

My pet monster will be kept in a secure cage from which it cannot escape and into which I could not accidentally stumble.

I will dress in bright and cheery colors, and so throw my enemies into confusion.

All bumbling conjurers, clumsy squires, no-talent bards, and cowardly thieves in the land will be preemptively put to death. My foes will surely give up and abandon their quest if they have no source of comic relief.

All naive, busty tavern wenches in my realm will be replaced with surly, world-weary waitresses who will provide no unexpected reinforcement and/or romantic subplot for the hero or his sidekick.

I will not fly into a rage and kill a messenger who brings me bad news just to illustrate how evil I really am. Good messengers are hard to come by.

I won't require high-ranking female members of my organization to wear a stainless-steel bustier. Morale is better with a more casual dress-code. Similarly, outfits made entirely from black leather will be reserved for formal occasions.

I will not turn into a snake. It never helps.

I will not grow a goatee. In the old days they made you look diabolic. Now they just make you look like a disaffected member of Generation X.

I will not imprison members of the same party in the same cell block, let alone the same cell. If they are important prisoners, I will keep the only key to the cell door on my person instead of handing out copies to every bottom-rung guard in the prison.

If my trusted lieutenant tells me my Legions of Terror are losing a battle, I will believe him. After all, he's my trusted lieutenant.

If an enemy I have just killed has a younger sibling or offspring anywhere, I will find them and have them killed immediately, instead of waiting for them to grow up harboring feelings of vengeance towards me in my old age.

If I absolutely must ride into battle, I will certainly not ride at the forefront of my Legions of Terror, nor will I seek out my opposite number among his army.

I will be neither chivalrous nor sporting. If I have an unstoppable superweapon, I will use it as early and as often as possible instead of keeping it in reserve.

Once my power is secure, I will destroy all those pesky time-travel devices.

When I capture the hero, I will make sure I also get his dog, monkey, ferret, or whatever sickeningly cute little animal capable of untying ropes and filching keys happens to follow him around.

I will maintain a healthy amount of skepticism when I capture the beautiful rebel and she claims she is attracted to my power and good looks and will gladly betray her companions if I just let her in on my plans.

I will only employ bounty hunters who work for money. Those who work for the pleasure of the hunt tend to do dumb things like even the odds to give the other guy a sporting chance.

I will make sure I have a clear understanding of who is responsible for what in my organization. For example, if my general screws up I will not draw my weapon, point it at him, say "And here is the price for failure," then suddenly turn and kill some random underling.

If an advisor says to me "My liege, he is but one man. What can one man possibly do?", I will reply "This." and kill the advisor.

If I learn that a callow youth has begun a quest to destroy me, I will slay him while he is still a callow youth instead of waiting for him to mature.

I will treat any beast which I control through magic or technology with respect and kindness. Thus if the control is ever broken, it will not immediately come after me for revenge.

If I learn the whereabouts of the one artifact which can destroy me, I will not send all my troops out to seize it. Instead I will send them out to seize something else and quietly put a Want-Ad in the local paper.

My main computers will have their own special operating system that will be completely incompatible with standard IBM and Macintosh powerbooks.

If one of my dungeon guards begins expressing concern over the conditions in the beautiful princess' cell, I will immediately transfer him to a less people-oriented position.

I will hire a team of board-certified architects and surveyors to examine my castle and inform me of any secret passages and abandoned tunnels that I might not know about.

If the beautiful princess that I capture says "I'll never marry you! Never, do you hear me, NEVER!!!", I will say "Oh well" and kill her.

I will not strike a bargain with a demonic being then attempt to double-cross it simply because I feel like being contrary.

The deformed mutants and odd-ball psychotics will have their place in my Legions of Terror. However before I send them out on important covert missions that require tact and subtlety, I will first see if there is anyone else equally qualified who would attract less attention.

My Legions of Terror will be trained in basic marksmanship. Any who cannot learn to hit a man-sized target at 10 meters will be used for target practice.

Before employing any captured artifacts or machinery, I will carefully read the owner's manual.

If it becomes necessary to escape, I will never stop to pose dramatically and toss off a one-liner.

I will never build a sentient computer smarter than I am.

My five-year-old child advisor will also be asked to decipher any code I am thinking of using. If he breaks the code in under 30 seconds, it will not be used. Note: this also applies to passwords.

If my advisors ask "Why are you risking everything on such a mad scheme?", I will not proceed until I have a response that satisfies them.

I will design fortress hallways with no alcoves or protruding structural supports which intruders could use for cover in a firefight.

Bulk trash will be disposed of in incinerators, not compactors. And they will be kept hot, with none of that nonsense about flames going through accessible tunnels at predictable intervals.

I will see a competent psychiatrist and get cured of all extremely unusual phobias and bizarre compulsive habits which could prove to be a disadvantage.

If I must have computer systems with publically available terminals, the maps they display of my complex will have a room clearly marked as the Main Control Room. That room will be the Execution Chamber. The actual main control room will be marked as Sewage Overflow Containment.

My security keypad will actually be a fingerprint scanner. Anyone who watches someone press a sequence of buttons or dusts the pad for fingerprints then subsequently tries to enter by repeating that sequence will trigger the alarm system.

No matter how many shorts we have in the system, my guards will be instructed to treat every surveillance camera malfunction as a full-scale emergency.

I will spare someone who saved my life sometime in the past. This is only reasonable as it encourages others to do so. However, the offer is good one time only. If they want me to spare them again, they'd better save my life again.

All midwives will be banned from the realm. All babies will be delivered at state-approved hospitals. Orphans will be placed in foster-homes, not abandoned in the woods to be raised by creatures of the wild.

When my guards split up to search for intruders, they will always travel in groups of at least two. They will be trained so that if one of them disappears mysteriously while on patrol, the other will immediately initiate an alert and call for backup, instead of quizzically peering around a corner.

If I decide to test a lieutenant's loyalty and see if he/she should be made a trusted lieutenant, I will have a crack squad of marksmen standing by in case the answer is no.

If all the heroes are standing together around a strange device and begin to taunt me, I will pull out a conventional weapon instead of using my unstoppable superweapon on them.

I will not agree to let the heroes go free if they win a rigged contest, even though my advisors assure me it is impossible for them to win.

When I create a multimedia presentation of my plan designed so that my five-year-old advisor can easily understand the details, I will not label the disk "Project Overlord" and leave it lying on top of my desk.

I will instruct my Legions of Terror to attack the hero en masse, instead of standing around waiting while members break off and attack one or two at a time.

If the hero runs up to my roof, I will not run up after him and struggle with him in an attempt to push him over the edge. I will also not engage him at the edge of a cliff. (In the middle of a rope-bridge over a river of molten lava is not even worth considering.)

If I have a fit of temporary insanity and decide to give the hero the chance to reject a job as my trusted lieutentant, I will retain enough sanity to wait until my current trusted lieutenant is out of earshot before making the offer.

I will not tell my Legions of Terror "And he must be taken alive!" The command will be "And try to take him alive if it is reasonably practical."

If my doomsday device happens to come with a reverse switch, as soon as it has been employed it will be melted down and made into limited-edition commemorative coins.

If my weakest troops fail to eliminate a hero, I will send out my best troops instead of wasting time with progressively stronger ones as he gets closer and closer to my fortress.

If I am fighting with the hero atop a moving platform, have disarmed him, and am about to finish him off and he glances behind me and drops flat, I too will drop flat instead of quizzically turning around to find out what he saw.

I will not shoot at any of my enemies if they are standing in front of the crucial support beam to a heavy, dangerous, unbalanced structure.

If I'm eating dinner with the hero, put poison in his goblet, then have to leave the table for any reason, I will order new drinks for both of us instead of trying to decide whether or not to switch with him.

I will not have captives of one sex guarded by members of the opposite sex.

I will not use any plan in which the final step is horribly complicated, e.g. "Align the 12 Stones of Power on the sacred altar then activate the medallion at the moment of total eclipse." Instead it will be more along the lines of "Push the button."

I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.

My vats of hazardous chemicals will be covered when not in use. Also, I will not construct walkways above them.

If a group of henchmen fail miserably at a task, I will not berate them for incompetence then send the same group out to try the task again.

After I captures the hero's superweapon, I will not immediately disband my legions and relax my guard because I believe whoever holds the weapon is unstoppable. After all, the hero held the weapon and I took it from him.

I will not design my Main Control Room so that every workstation is facing away from the door.

I will not ignore the messenger that stumbles in exhausted and obviously agitated until my personal grooming or current entertainment is finished. It might actually be important.

If I ever talk to the hero on the phone, I will not taunt him. Instead I will say this his dogged perseverance has given me new insight on the futility of my evil ways and that if he leaves me alone for a few months of quiet contemplation I will likely return to the path of righteousness. (Heroes are incredibly gullible in this regard.)

If I decide to hold a double execution of the hero and an underling who failed or betrayed me, I will see to it that the hero is scheduled to go first.

When arresting prisoners, my guards will not allow them to stop and grab a useless trinket of purely sentimental value.

My dungeon will have its own qualified medical staff complete with bodyguards. That way if a prisoner becomes sick and his cellmate tells the guard it's an emergency, the guard will fetch a trauma team instead of opening up the cell for a look.

My door mechanisms will be designed so that blasting the control panel on the outside seals the door and blasting the control panel on the inside opens the door, not vice versa.

My dungeon cells will not be furnished with objects that contain reflective surfaces or anything that can be unravelled.

If an attractive young couple enters my realm, I will carefully monitor their activities. If I find they are happy and affectionate, I will ignore them. However if circumstance have forced them together against their will and they spend all their time bickering and criticizing each other except during the intermittent occasions when they are saving each others' lives at which point there are hints of sexual tension, I will immediately order their execution.

Any data file of crucial importance will be padded to 1.45Mb in size.

Finally, to keep my subjects permanently locked in a mindless trance, I will provide each of them with free unlimited Internet access.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? - 7/6/2017 10:56:03 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
The importance of the gold standard was . . .


to keep the biggest bond holders happy, period. End of story.

quote:

rothschild keyensians did was to replace a self sustaining system . . .


Before I laugh my arse off; what was it about the arbitrarily valued gold standard (settled at two, then four meetings every year) that was "self sustaining"?

quote:

with play monopoly money by causing wars and running debt up beyond the total value of all the gold and planet and then pretend it was impossible to increase the value of gold. Long story short now we have the liquidity during deflationary periods with near worthless money that has no intrinsic value.


Get ahold of yourself. First you are saying that gold standard is best because it keeps prices and wages the same forever, but then you claim that the Rothschilds were themselves and themselves only at fault for not allowing increase in price of gold.

Go have a nap, I'll get to your next post in just a bit.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Who REALLY Controls the World ? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125