quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

quote:

tweakabelle
Bosco's allegation that "the fake news media" issues "calls for violence' is as fanciful and fact free as his usual nonsense. I am unable to identify a rational connection between this incident and the fake news issue. Perhaps Bosco will be kind enough to outline the connection he sees between the two so that we might have a clue what he's talking about.

Unless Bosco succeeds in advancing a credible connection, it's a case of Bosco cynically using this murder to gain a political 'advantage'. I'm afraid to add that this isn't the first time and there seems little likelihood that it will be the last.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


"Hands up don't shoot" was a big lie, and yes the MSM pushed that lie hard.

Is that your explanation of how the MSM issues "calls to violence" that have a direct consequence in a senseless murder of a NYC cop?

It is utterly incoherent - it waffles on but it explains nothing.

"Hands up don't shoot" is most clearly NOT a "call to violence" - quite the opposite in fact. You provide no link to support your claim that it was a "big lie" and/or the MSM "pushed hard on that". And you decline to even mention the NYC murder, so there's no attempt to provide a linkage between any of the above (no matter how dubious it is) and the cop's murder, which you may recall was the allegation you made in the OP.

So you have made a wild unsubstantiated allegation that muddies people you regard as political enemies. A charge so baseless that you are unable to string together two sensible words in its defence. So another case of Bosco callously exploiting a senseless murder to make political capital ....

Hands up don't shoot was based on the lie that Brown was tring to surrender when he was shot. The message behind it was that even when you do what you are supposed to and follow orders you will be guned down by the police. That leaves? Violence. Remember the slogan was the excuse for burning large parts of Ferguson, and it was used not by the people tring to stop the violence, but by the looters.
Taken out of context it sounds like a call for non-violence, in context it is a battle cry for the anti cop factions.

Horseshit. Taken anyway you wish your consistent negative response to black complaints is a racist message. Unarmed people have been gunned down even when following orders. Very often the officers involved panicked and have been shown to be unfit for duty. Only an unreasonable SCOTUS ruling gives them the license to kill and allows them to get away with such reckless behavior.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

quote:

tweakabelle
Bosco's allegation that "the fake news media" issues "calls for violence' is as fanciful and fact free as his usual nonsense. I am unable to identify a rational connection between this incident and the fake news issue. Perhaps Bosco will be kind enough to outline the connection he sees between the two so that we might have a clue what he's talking about.

Unless Bosco succeeds in advancing a credible connection, it's a case of Bosco cynically using this murder to gain a political 'advantage'. I'm afraid to add that this isn't the first time and there seems little likelihood that it will be the last.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


"Hands up don't shoot" was a big lie, and yes the MSM pushed that lie hard.

Is that your explanation of how the MSM issues "calls to violence" that have a direct consequence in a senseless murder of a NYC cop?

It is utterly incoherent - it waffles on but it explains nothing.

"Hands up don't shoot" is most clearly NOT a "call to violence" - quite the opposite in fact. You provide no link to support your claim that it was a "big lie" and/or the MSM "pushed hard on that". And you decline to even mention the NYC murder, so there's no attempt to provide a linkage between any of the above (no matter how dubious it is) and the cop's murder, which you may recall was the allegation you made in the OP.

So you have made a wild unsubstantiated allegation that muddies people you regard as political enemies. A charge so baseless that you are unable to string together two sensible words in its defence. So another case of Bosco callously exploiting a senseless murder to make political capital ....

Hands up don't shoot was based on the lie that Brown was tring to surrender when he was shot. The message behind it was that even when you do what you are supposed to and follow orders you will be guned down by the police. That leaves? Violence. Remember the slogan was the excuse for burning large parts of Ferguson, and it was used not by the people tring to stop the violence, but by the looters.
Taken out of context it sounds like a call for non-violence, in context it is a battle cry for the anti cop factions.

Horseshit. Taken anyway you wish your consistent negative response to black complaints is a racist message. Unarmed people have been gunned down even when following orders. Very often the officers involved panicked and have been shown to be unfit for duty. Only an unreasonable SCOTUS ruling gives them the license to kill and allows them to get away with such reckless behavior.

Can you find it in you to condemn this murder of a police officer?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

It's a tragic case.

The other side of the story is that the killer suffered schizophrenia and was off his meds.

This incident has nothing to do with BLM. Just shows your callousness in politicizing the tragedy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

quote:

tweakabelle
Bosco's allegation that "the fake news media" issues "calls for violence' is as fanciful and fact free as his usual nonsense. I am unable to identify a rational connection between this incident and the fake news issue. Perhaps Bosco will be kind enough to outline the connection he sees between the two so that we might have a clue what he's talking about.

Unless Bosco succeeds in advancing a credible connection, it's a case of Bosco cynically using this murder to gain a political 'advantage'. I'm afraid to add that this isn't the first time and there seems little likelihood that it will be the last.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


"Hands up don't shoot" was a big lie, and yes the MSM pushed that lie hard.

Is that your explanation of how the MSM issues "calls to violence" that have a direct consequence in a senseless murder of a NYC cop?

It is utterly incoherent - it waffles on but it explains nothing.

"Hands up don't shoot" is most clearly NOT a "call to violence" - quite the opposite in fact. You provide no link to support your claim that it was a "big lie" and/or the MSM "pushed hard on that". And you decline to even mention the NYC murder, so there's no attempt to provide a linkage between any of the above (no matter how dubious it is) and the cop's murder, which you may recall was the allegation you made in the OP.

So you have made a wild unsubstantiated allegation that muddies people you regard as political enemies. A charge so baseless that you are unable to string together two sensible words in its defence. So another case of Bosco callously exploiting a senseless murder to make political capital ....

Hands up don't shoot was based on the lie that Brown was tring to surrender when he was shot. The message behind it was that even when you do what you are supposed to and follow orders you will be guned down by the police. That leaves? Violence. Remember the slogan was the excuse for burning large parts of Ferguson, and it was used not by the people tring to stop the violence, but by the looters.
Taken out of context it sounds like a call for non-violence, in context it is a battle cry for the anti cop factions.

Horseshit. Taken anyway you wish your consistent negative response to black complaints is a racist message. Unarmed people have been gunned down even when following orders. Very often the officers involved panicked and have been shown to be unfit for duty. Only an unreasonable SCOTUS ruling gives them the license to kill and allows them to get away with such reckless behavior.

Can you find it in you to condemn this murder of a police officer?

I did that in my very first post in this thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

quote:

tweakabelle
Bosco's allegation that "the fake news media" issues "calls for violence' is as fanciful and fact free as his usual nonsense. I am unable to identify a rational connection between this incident and the fake news issue. Perhaps Bosco will be kind enough to outline the connection he sees between the two so that we might have a clue what he's talking about.

Unless Bosco succeeds in advancing a credible connection, it's a case of Bosco cynically using this murder to gain a political 'advantage'. I'm afraid to add that this isn't the first time and there seems little likelihood that it will be the last.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


"Hands up don't shoot" was a big lie, and yes the MSM pushed that lie hard.

Is that your explanation of how the MSM issues "calls to violence" that have a direct consequence in a senseless murder of a NYC cop?

It is utterly incoherent - it waffles on but it explains nothing.

"Hands up don't shoot" is most clearly NOT a "call to violence" - quite the opposite in fact. You provide no link to support your claim that it was a "big lie" and/or the MSM "pushed hard on that". And you decline to even mention the NYC murder, so there's no attempt to provide a linkage between any of the above (no matter how dubious it is) and the cop's murder, which you may recall was the allegation you made in the OP.

So you have made a wild unsubstantiated allegation that muddies people you regard as political enemies. A charge so baseless that you are unable to string together two sensible words in its defence. So another case of Bosco callously exploiting a senseless murder to make political capital ....

Hands up don't shoot was based on the lie that Brown was tring to surrender when he was shot. The message behind it was that even when you do what you are supposed to and follow orders you will be guned down by the police. That leaves? Violence. Remember the slogan was the excuse for burning large parts of Ferguson, and it was used not by the people tring to stop the violence, but by the looters.
Taken out of context it sounds like a call for non-violence, in context it is a battle cry for the anti cop factions.

Horseshit. Taken anyway you wish your consistent negative response to black complaints is a racist message. Unarmed people have been gunned down even when following orders. Very often the officers involved panicked and have been shown to be unfit for duty. Only an unreasonable SCOTUS ruling gives them the license to kill and allows them to get away with such reckless behavior.

Can you find it in you to condemn this murder of a police officer?

I did that in my very first post in this thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

I suposse everyone noticed that the mayor ran off to protest at g20.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

I suposse everyone noticed that the mayor ran off to protest at g20.

Will moose jump up to wail about him angering our "friends" I wonder

Kinda doubt it

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

When Rolf committed his atrocities in NC he was not a member of the Klan , he did not comunicate with the Klan, he did not co-ordinate with
the Klan. However he did eat up every sick thing they had to say about black people. They did not have a direct responsibility. But don't you think they had influence and helped push him to his atrocity?
The person who did this, the one who took revenge for the Gardner killing, and the one who ambushed the cops protecting the BLM prtest in Dallas have some things in common. None o thm were BLM, none were in comunication with them , none in any way co-ordinated their attacks with BLM. All ate up every sick thing BLM had to say about cops. They do not have direct repsonsible. But don't you tink the had influence and helped push them to their atrocites?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

Ferguson and Baltimore are perfect examples of this. When the followers of BLM rioted, looted and burned who did they hurt the most?
The black community. They burned out the black business's , they made it hard for the white business's to rebuild, they wrecked the economy in the black neighborhoods. Black people were the ones who suffered most. Whrn to avoid a repeat the Baltimore police backed off the crime rate, mostly in the black neighborhoods, doubled, the murder rate hit all time highs. Again, who suffered, the black community. Who gained, BLM because they blamed all the harm their belivers did on racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

I suposse everyone noticed that the mayor ran off to protest at g20.

Will moose jump up to wail about him angering our "friends" I wonder

Kinda doubt it

Of course not, he is standing up for the "little guy" and part of the resistents. If it makes things difficult for Trum who cares what else it does.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

When Rolf committed his atrocities in NC he was not a member of the Klan , he did not comunicate with the Klan, he did not co-ordinate with
the Klan. However he did eat up every sick thing they had to say about black people. They did not have a direct responsibility. But don't you think they had influence and helped push him to his atrocity?
The person who did this, the one who took revenge for the Gardner killing, and the one who ambushed the cops protecting the BLM prtest in Dallas have some things in common. None o thm were BLM, none were in comunication with them , none in any way co-ordinated their attacks with BLM. All ate up every sick thing BLM had to say about cops. They do not have direct repsonsible. But don't you tink the had influence and helped push them to their atrocites?

Here is the sniveling evil in your twisted logic. The Klan's oratory was hateful, even murderous, saying that black people were less than human. BLM's oratory was defensive, saying stop shooting us. Not the same at all except in your racist imagination. To equate BLM with the KKK reveals the nasty consequences of too much inbreeding in your family.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

Ferguson and Baltimore are perfect examples of this. When the followers of BLM rioted, looted and burned who did they hurt the most?
The black community. They burned out the black business's , they made it hard for the white business's to rebuild, they wrecked the economy in the black neighborhoods. Black people were the ones who suffered most. Whrn to avoid a repeat the Baltimore police backed off the crime rate, mostly in the black neighborhoods, doubled, the murder rate hit all time highs. Again, who suffered, the black community. Who gained, BLM because they blamed all the harm their belivers did on racism.

No, they didn't, you lying fuck. Show us one citation where BLM blamed property destruction on racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

Ferguson and Baltimore are perfect examples of this. When the followers of BLM rioted, looted and burned who did they hurt the most?
The black community. They burned out the black business's , they made it hard for the white business's to rebuild, they wrecked the economy in the black neighborhoods. Black people were the ones who suffered most. Whrn to avoid a repeat the Baltimore police backed off the crime rate, mostly in the black neighborhoods, doubled, the murder rate hit all time highs. Again, who suffered, the black community. Who gained, BLM because they blamed all the harm their belivers did on racism.

No, they didn't, you lying fuck. Show us one citation where BLM blamed property destruction on racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

I suposse everyone noticed that the mayor ran off to protest at g20.

Will moose jump up to wail about him angering our "friends" I wonder

Kinda doubt it