RE: Sharia "Law" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


MrDiscipline44 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/27/2006 9:51:10 PM)

Wow, it's amazing how some people seem to think that they deserve an explaination of something that's none of their business. So you're embaressed that I called you on your statement and you need to draw the attention off yourself by making a big deal about whether or not I have a profile?  Come on. For 47 years old you sure don't act like an adult with high school antics like that.




popeye1250 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/27/2006 11:24:04 PM)

Level, they have a funny way of pronouncing "Shiite" here in the South!




IronBear -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/27/2006 11:46:02 PM)

There was at one stage about 15 years ago t-shirts being worn on the back it said "Be carefull you may stand on some Shiite" and on the front was written "Help a Moslem meet Allah today." Fortunately we had laws enacted not long after which prohibited the wearing of such inflamatory slogans.. A couple of brave lads who ended up beihg hospitalised for wearing them after being sent to jail for a largish term for attacks on the Muslum Community, could never understand why no one wanted to be seen with them when they were wearing the offensive t-shirts.... I have a largish number of Islamic friends who are also working hard to not only integrate into our society but to eradicate the hot heads and radicals there too.. People are individuals and can bring diversity to a new country..

I have memories when growing up of the anti Italian, anti Greek and anti Chinese immigrante because the didn't all speek english or understand our Aussie phrases or because their skin was yellow. Nothing was said about the British or other Europeans except for the Germans. We needed them here to help build our country and bring their skills learned in the country of birth.. What does piss me off as it does even Politicians is the education system where by our kids have zero knowledge of our history.... 

If you want to lead a crusade to modify the Islamic culture and their traditions which have been going longer then the USA and Australia was even thought of and even dating back to when the English were a feudal in fighting mob, better tix and clean up your own back yard.. Cultures do change but rarely by activivists or armed force, but usually by osmosis when a culture realises that to mix as equalls with other cultures they can learn different things and slowley make changes from within... 




Level -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 3:01:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: corsetgirl

No, I don't need to scamper out the back door...I am here....I am visible...and you have no profile...where is your profile?  Hmmmm?


I don't know what happened to MrD's profile, but I hardly think he's "hiding", that's not his style lol. Sometimes CM "eats" them, makes it hard to access the profile *shrugs*.




meatcleaver -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 3:50:29 AM)

Appalling and displays a need for reform in Islam which I think most forward thinking muslim intellectuals admit. This sort of thing just feeds western paranoia and gives excuses to fundementalists in the west to point out the barbarity of Islam, while conveniently forgetting western barbarity.




philosophy -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 4:50:34 AM)

.......most, if not all legal systems have their nasty sides...ditto cultures and religions. i am just as saddened by a system that would deny a transplant to a needy child because of the relative lack of wealth of their parents, as i am by the application of sharia law in Iraq.




Level -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 5:07:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

.......most, if not all legal systems have their nasty sides...ditto cultures and religions. i am just as saddened by a system that would deny a transplant to a needy child because of the relative lack of wealth of their parents, as i am by the application of sharia law in Iraq.


Good point, philosophy.




Lashra -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 6:29:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

herein lays the problem. Whgilst I can agree with this at times I also believe that all cultures shlould be able to live their lives accxording to their cultures provided thatthey don't try to interfere with others who are not of their cultures..

If the majority Lashra (grins g'day lass), follow your view on this howw can we stop them from working against others who do not conform with their beliefs? Next it could be the Gorean Lifstylers or the Pagans. The latter is under attack by the Right Wing Christian Extreemests both in the US and Australia via the Political areas in which they hold sway.... Such things can and will bring open conflict to the streets.

I'm not saying we shouldn't say anything but there are limits to which we should voice our opinions..


There's already open conflict in the streets, its in the privacy of homes and it happens everyday. If these women don't get educated and stand up for themselves they will never stop suffering and it will continue forever. It seems the only thing that is understood is violence. I know for a fact if a violent man runs up against an armed woman who WILL shoot him, he will back down or get shot in the process[:)] Either way its letting them know we will not be treated like this anymore.

Of course thats why their religion doesn't want them educated, because they would realise that they are more then just breeding fodder. They would actually want to be treated like human beings with rights. Keep them ignorant and you can keep them under control. Kind of like another religion that I know that isn't so far off in belief as Islam.

The extreme christians, yep we got them here in the US too. They are pretty much controlling things and yes women are loosening their rights. Myself and others are fighting them tooth and nail. The unfortunate thing is alot of the younger women don't remember what its like not to have choices. They have been blinded by the religious right and are like sheep, they following along. I'm not the slave type, never have been never will and I will fight until I'm 6 feet under.

~Lashra




popeye1250 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 7:43:14 AM)

Ironbear, I hardly think it is "predjudiced" to be against a "religion" that condones "honor killings" of women.
And if any muslims in my country think that it's ok to be doing that kind of stuff they can get the fuck out of my country.
I don't know what all this "diversity" crap is!
Stoning women to death is "diversity"? "Oh, honor killings are part of my religion.!"
"Oh yeah? Well kicking muslims ASSES is part of MY religion!"
How's that for "Diversity?
Why is "diversity" supposed to be a "good" thing?
It doesn't seem to be working very well in Holland, Sweden, Denmark and other European countries, does it?
Lashra, Hoo-AHH!




popeye1250 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 7:51:15 AM)

Iron Bear, I just looked at your profile and you're in Aus.
We do things a little differently here in the U.S.
Why did you guys put up with *your* government taking your guns away? That's like being dictated to be a govt.
Our govt. is "By the People" which means we own and run the govt and they don't dictate to us although with Bush and Big Business entrenched in Washington now that's debatable!




MrDiscipline44 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 8:27:17 AM)

I'd like to see your legal documents that state your part owner of the U.S. government. What was the last law you passed that had national effect? What kind of bullshit is that? You, like many of us the U.S., don't own or run the government. The big wigs in D.C. dictate to us as much as Hussein dictated to his people. The U.S. is just more lenient in the laws it creates. If you walked up to the White House and tried to tell the DIC (dick in charge) how to you wanted something to change, you be tossed on your ass. That's after a three or four day cavity search. So you can stuff that bullshit about "we own and run the government."




KenDckey -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 8:46:42 AM)

This thread reminds me of a fight they had in Georgia when I arrived there from Germany.  Some fool passed through the legislature a wonderful obscenity law to protect its citizens.   Within hours of it being signed by the Gov the lawyers for the Jewish Community sued the Christian community because the new testament was obscene, the Christian community sued the Muslim community for the Koran being obscene, and the Muslim community sued the Jews for the old testament for being obscene.  And to make it all fun, I forgot who it was sued the schools because the text books were obscene. (All the lawyers were standing together trying to get their lawsuit filed first).  Needless to say, the law went to far. 

When I was in Africa, the Base Commander passed a regulation that said if you weren't in uniform, men would wear a coat and tie, women would wear dresses - no exceptions.   The regulation was written on Wed.  Printed on Thurs.  distributed on Friday.  Friday afternoon the Military Police went down and  picked up all the tickets on base.   Saturday morning they started issueing tickets.   Our MP's went to the beach and ticketed everyone for wearing bathing suits.   An example of military extreemeism.  Oh the regulation was recinded by noon on Sat.  the MPs ran out of tickets.

Although I personally find the law being discussed (Avoiding Grace and her spelling contest - I miss you Grace ~kiss~) discusting and repugnant, I find other laws equally so.  Can I affect these short of armed conflict (I have given you 2 examples of civil rebellion - one in the courts one through extreme enforcement)?  Probably not if they belong to other countries.  In my opinion, I think this is more of an issue for the United Nations.   If they condone it, then it must be world policy.   If they don't, then they have some choices to make - War, Acceptance, Sanctions, etc.

My grand daughters dad (a Palestinian) tried to take her (a beautiful blonde, blue eyed virgin) so he could sell her.   He figured he could live a long time on what she would bring.  Fortunately, I had taught her how to protect herself from leaving the country against her will.  In my opinion, the buying and selling of individuals (legal in many Islamic dominated countries) should be ablolished.  Can I stop it.   Only once.




Moloch -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 8:56:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lashra

Personally I think the muslim women need to take up arms and get rid of their insane males. If they don't they will always be considered useless breeding fodder by them. This my opinion and don't bother trying to change it.

~Lashra


Now now Lashra dont you know that "forcing your views and opinions" is not politically correct? Its not nice to criticise their culture,  what happened with tolerance and acceptance ?  *insert sarcastic tone here*




KenDckey -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 9:04:35 AM)

Hey Moloch    I love politically correct.    LOL

I am 1/8 indian (4 tribes) and 7/8 some kinda gringo.  My sons are 1/2 African/Italian (Italian mom born in Africa) which makes them African American.   My grand children's mom is from Mexico.   One of my grand children was born in Italy.  OK so to be politically correct (because 100% American isn't on the form) what are my grandkids?    LOL   Usually it depends on their mood when they are filling out the form.  One son put African American on his forms because there was an ourcry against his company for lack of paridoy (and as it would happen they needed his singular name to make parady).   LOL   In court the judge laughed at the rediculouslessness of all this.




LadyEllen -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 9:24:44 AM)

Hi

I can sympathise about the guns thing - the UK Govt banned handguns, rifles and any shotgun that can take more than two rounds a few years ago. Why - because some nutter went into a school and shot a load of infant children. He had the guns legally - he had been checked by the police, who were aware of his previous and ongoing psych treatment but yet approved him to have them! Thousands of law abiding, taxpaying people were robbed of their guns as a result. That guns dont kill, people do, is not a valid point when the tabloids are raging about all the nuts with guns, and something has to be done to keep them quiet. Even our Olympic target shooters have to train outside the country now, because even they are not allowed to have a gun! I wonder what will happen in 2012 with the games in London...... will the shooting events be held in Ireland maybe, or will UK police arrest (or shoot dead) every target shooter on arrival at Heathrow for having a banned weapon? (dont laugh, it could happen).

Another reason advanced when it emerged that not all gun owners are nutters but perfectly normal people, was that banning guns would reduce gun crime. Well, I am a police adviser and I can tell you now, that gun related crime is on the up across the UK, so it doesnt look like that was the case either. And worse - every time now that someone appears to have a gun in public, a hundred firearms officers descend on them and often end up shooting them dead - we have had plenty of such incidents; a guy with a table leg in a bag walking in town, people playing with fakes (even toys). I know the police cant afford to take chances and that these guns are deadly weapons, but the paranoia about guns we have now is ridiculous. My kids have toy guns, but I darent play with them in the garden anymore in case I get shot by some overzealous officer, or imprisoned (minimum five years) on a charge of using a firearm to threaten others (which applies even if its a fake or toy).

The problem with all this of course is that the nutters and the criminals dont care about the law and will get guns if they want them. So all it means is that law abiding people cant get them. But then, law abiding people dont need them do they, as they will accept whatever laws are made or at least will have to from now on, since they have no means of resisting any oppressive laws that might be made.....

It also makes me wonder I'm afraid about the holding of guns by the Islamist (not Islamic) faction in the UK. How many guns do they have that the police dont know about for fear of being accused of picking on Islam if they went looking? Enough for their stated aims? Enough to equip say a hundred eager young misled Muslims for a larger attack? Enough to equip a few thousand for an Islamist revolution? These are the same people remember who can smuggle in enough dope and heroin to keep the UK well supplied sufficient for the price of heroin to be less than five pounds a hit....... if they can do that, then how difficult would it be to smuggle in a few thousand AK47s and ammunition, or a few hundred RPGs, or a few hundred ground to air missiles..... and with the British Army deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere and the airfields in the hands of these fanatics, who would there be to resist? The Territorial Army?- they're mostly deployed too. The police?-any respectable revolutionary would ensure they were stymied before they started by taking out all senior officers in their homes and blowing up the police stations. Our NATO allies? - probably not, as such a revolution would no doubt be synchronised to take place everywhere at the same time.

Sharia could be here in a few weeks or so. I would fight, if I had anything more than a stick - so the alternative would be to walk with the rest of my family into the reeducation centre, and once my background were established, to die at the end of a rope like so many others before me, because there is no way on this Earth that I will ever praise or call on any deity other than those of my ancestors or submit to a bunch of fanatical halfwits.

Likely, in the end we would win such a struggle though, once our forces were returned home a few weeks later, and organisations restored to some semblance of order. In the meantime thousands will have died, and best of all, Afghanistan and Iraq will be left in the hands of those from whom we took it and/or those who would like to have them, and our western democracies will have been humiliated and injured beyond quick repair. Add in the loss of oil supplies from countries sympathetic to the aims of such a revolution and we are in even bigger problems. And all for the price of only a few thousand Islamist fanatic lives as martyrs in each country - not even a price really as every one goes straight to paradise.

Most worryingly, if I can think up such a plot from my front room in under fifteen minutes..... I will bet that Al Qaeda already has it on the drawing board.

E





MrDiscipline44 -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 9:45:20 AM)

No offence Ellen, but if such a thing were plausable, it would've been attempted already. After all, those gun laws were put inplace years ago and your troops didn't leave out of country yesterday.

I also don't care how large you can stretch an orifice, you're not going to fit an AK or a RPG in there. So you really can't liken gun smuggling to drug smuggling.

Lastly, just because your country has limited resources to combat a domestic distrubance doesn't mean that other NATO allies are in the same boat or would just leave the U.K. out to dry.

Just a few thoughts on what you wrote.




Moloch -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 10:21:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Hey Moloch    I love politically correct.    LOL

I am 1/8 indian (4 tribes) and 7/8 some kinda gringo.  My sons are 1/2 African/Italian (Italian mom born in Africa) which makes them African American.   My grand children's mom is from Mexico.   One of my grand children was born in Italy.  OK so to be politically correct (because 100% American isn't on the form) what are my grandkids?    LOL   Usually it depends on their mood when they are filling out the form.  One son put African American on his forms because there was an ourcry against his company for lack of paridoy (and as it would happen they needed his singular name to make parady).   LOL   In court the judge laughed at the rediculouslessness of all this.


Hehehe your family knows how to party!




KenDckey -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 10:29:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Hey Moloch    I love politically correct.    LOL

I am 1/8 indian (4 tribes) and 7/8 some kinda gringo.  My sons are 1/2 African/Italian (Italian mom born in Africa) which makes them African American.   My grand children's mom is from Mexico.   One of my grand children was born in Italy.  OK so to be politically correct (because 100% American isn't on the form) what are my grandkids?    LOL   Usually it depends on their mood when they are filling out the form.  One son put African American on his forms because there was an ourcry against his company for lack of paridoy (and as it would happen they needed his singular name to make parady).   LOL   In court the judge laughed at the rediculouslessness of all this.


Hehehe your family knows how to party!


We didn't get our last name for notin    LOL




CrappyDom -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 11:21:53 AM)

Who is more uncivilized, the barbarian or the civilized man who acts like a barbarian?

There is now a cure for ovarian cancer but Republicans are unwilling to allow the use of it.  Why?  Because the cancer is caused by a STD and they believe that threating women with cancer is moral.

Muslims have nothing on the West for ugly brutality, just ask the tribes and peoples that have been wiped from the face of the earth.




meatcleaver -> RE: Sharia "Law" (7/28/2006 1:08:04 PM)

How many muslims do you think there is in teh UK? One million? There are more muslims in Holland than the UK with a population four times as small and no one here is worried about an islamic revolution. 10% of the population of France is muslim do if it's going to happen anywhere it is in France. But somehow I doubt it.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875