RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans?

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

tamaka -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/24/2017 9:21:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marini People typically say and post whatever they want on here, so I am free to do the same. I typically do not come here to argue, but many enjoy keeping the back and forth going. I mentioned I was Black, because I felt a racial implication in this thread, I mentioned I was the only regular Black poster, because I thought I was. But since we have so many Black people posting here {2}, I celebrated this fact. [sm=line.gif] How long do you want to keep this going? Yay for all the Black people who post here. Enjoy your evening! Gee Wayward, i sure hope her answer meets with your approval.

Wayward5oul -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/24/2017 9:33:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Marini People typically say and post whatever they want on here, so I am free to do the same. I typically do not come here to argue, but many enjoy keeping the back and forth going. I mentioned I was Black, because I felt a racial implication in this thread, I mentioned I was the only regular Black poster, because I thought I was. But since we have so many Black people posting here {2}, I celebrated this fact. [sm=line.gif] How long do you want to keep this going? Yay for all the Black people who post here. Enjoy your evening! Gee Wayward, i sure hope her answer meets with your approval. Is this where I get to claim you are my fan, as you did with me? Or am I supposed to tell you to go drink a cup of tea? I'm confused because neither response makes any sense to me, but it's what you say to me, so they must have some sort of point.

Marini -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/24/2017 9:43:03 PM)
I am not really phased, I have mentioned the lack of other Black posers before, I will mention it again, and whenever I want. I could name 20 different ethnic groups that don't or rarely post here, and that also would be a FACT. Live and let live

Wayward5oul -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/24/2017 9:43:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marini People typically say and post whatever they want on here, so I am free to do the same. I typically do not come here to argue, but many enjoy keeping the back and forth going. I mentioned I was Black, because I felt a racial implication in this thread, I mentioned I was the only regular Black poster, because I thought I was. But since we have so many Black people posting here {2}, I celebrated this fact. [sm=line.gif] How long do you want to keep this going? Yay for all the Black people who post here. Enjoy your evening! I don't need to keep going on about anything. I was responding directly to incorrect statements you made, which is when you told me that I needed to stop. So You are the one who took issue with a statement i made, not the other way around. And yes you are free to post what you want on here. The same could be said for the poster you were berating. And the same goes for me, despite you thinking you can tell posters to stop if you don't like what they post. I have no desire to go round and round with you. Especially in this thread, which I think is a ludicrous thread to begin with.

Marini -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/24/2017 10:27:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: Marini People typically say and post whatever they want on here, so I am free to do the same. I typically do not come here to argue, but many enjoy keeping the back and forth going. I mentioned I was Black, because I felt a racial implication in this thread, I mentioned I was the only regular Black poster, because I thought I was. But since we have so many Black people posting here {2}, I celebrated this fact. [sm=line.gif] How long do you want to keep this going? Yay for all the Black people who post here. Enjoy your evening! I don't need to keep going on about anything. I was responding directly to incorrect statements you made, which is when you told me that I needed to stop. So You are the one who took issue with a statement i made, not the other way around. And yes you are free to post what you want on here. The same could be said for the poster you were berating. And the same goes for me, despite you thinking you can tell posters to stop if you don't like what they post. I have no desire to go round and round with you. Especially in this thread, which I think is a ludicrous thread to begin with. I agree that you can't control what people type on-line, anywhere. The expression, "you need to Stop", is actually an expression, I said it jokingly. Message boards are often places where people can discuss a variety of points of view. I usually try to comment, state my point, and keep it moving. Many people go back and forth for pages, holding grudges, across posts, for months and years. I practice selective posting, and selective reading. That is where, To each his own, comes in. I try to agree to disagree, as much as possible. We all have a right to have opposing points of view. Be well

itsSIRtou -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 12:08:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marini Actually, I am glad to hear there is another Black poster, I will look out for him. Has he been posting here for over 10 years, like I have? Actually, I am very special, but certainly not because I post here. I was pointing out the fact, and it is still a fact, we have always had very few Black people posting here. This is based on 12 years experience of posting here. Yay, for 2 Black posters, we are moving up. Thanks for playing yup.....I'm one of the other Black posters...... I'm not sure how long Ive been on here..... (it feels like decades somedays for how stupid some posts on here make Me feel like time just drags...) I'm the one who usually reminds the fools like the OP how much of a rotting fence post they are not as smart as lately, since he doesn't listen to the white people tell him as much. even I have to sometimes take a break from talking about the stupid things that come up on here somedays..... take this OP for instance, he knows why he posts this sort of tripe, - its because he got roasted on another thread(s) by smarter people than he is, so he posts treads like this to, in his mind get back at us for making him look like the dumbass he actually is. I didn't post on here earlier cuz this sort of post just makes Me yawn. I'm an intelligent Black Man now, in this century, why am to care about centuries ago and what some random dumbass like boss-hoe thinks about it? after all, if we as Blacks came from such intellectual beginnings he thinks is inferior, then why is it SO easy to kick boss-hoe's other posts to the curb? why then is boscox inferior to Blacks? After all, he must be inferior if he cant make the few Blacks here cower in a corner with his blinding alt-right intellect right? [:D] why does he & it look like even to his own race the whiner he is?

tweakabelle -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 2:08:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Its always been obvious that skin color isn't the only difference between the races, and this goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation Nothing to do with racism, everything to do with science and inquiring, open minds Hilarious. You are trying to hide your racism behind the banner of science. And the only result is that you reveal to us the extent of your misunderstanding of science, the depth of your ignorance and the magnitude of your hate. Despite intensive inquiries, science has no concept of race. Biologists have been unable to identify accurate race markers in genes or chromosomes. Your attempt to use science to justify the racist claim that "that skin color isn't the only difference between the races" falls flat on its face. Race has no meaning in science, it is not a valid scientific category. This claim has no basis in biology or any other scientific discipline. Nor does this article offer any new information on this question, nor does it "goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation" as you mistakenly claim. The "observation" exists in your imagination, and your imagination alone, not in biology or science. Your claim is possible only after a ridiculously stupid misunderstanding of what the article actually says. As many others have noted, there is nothing in the article to suggest interaction on any level between humans and non-humans. The connection seems to exist only in your hate addled head. Someone asked 'What is your real purpose in starting this thread?'. The answer is that it is a provocative attempt to justify your hatreds on completely spurious pretend-science grounds ie. shameless, undiluted race baiting. It is pleasing to note the emphatic contemptuous rejection it has received from practically all posters.

BoscoX -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 4:52:09 AM)
Denier. [:)]

BamaD -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 5:06:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Denier. [:)] Do some research on genetics. To interbreed they must be genetically related.

BoscoX -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 5:13:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Denier. [:)] Do some research on genetics. To interbreed they must be genetically related. Yes, hominins are related, that's not at issue - read the article I linked to in the OP. http://newatlas.com/ancient-ghost-species-human/50591/?ref=yfp HeavyDrinker pointed out that neanderthals and perhaps others are already known to have interbred with some homo sapiens, so while this is a new discovery the concept itself isn't new or unheard of, or even too surprising. Why is it that nobody howled when it was discovered that neanderthals interbred with Asians and some Caucasians

mnottertail -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 5:24:28 AM)
for the same reason they are not howling now, most of us are sane 'RELATIVELY' unprejudiced people (you dont understand that, ask black folk) who are not obsessed with humans fucking humans, and ethnicities or tanning solutions are really not at issue. Thats why we dont understand why retarded putinjizz felchgobbling nutsucker compound gimp pedophiles such as yourself are shitting your pants over people fucking many thousands of years ago.

Aylee -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 6:35:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Denier. [:)] Do some research on genetics. To interbreed they must be genetically related. All the creatures and plants are genetically related. Not that I think you can breed with a potato. (And I do not want to know about any efforts.) To interbreed you tend to need to stay in the same Genus, not necessarily Species. Hence we can have ligers! Different species, yet same genus (Panthera). Now to the article - nothing really new there. There were several Homo species running around a long time ago. Apparently they screwed like rabbits. H. Sapiens won out in the end. Despite Tweaks protestations to the contrary, modern humans have phenotype differences - we often hear the term "race" used to describe this. Ethnic origin, would be a better term than race, but it is an unclear term to most users. Now the picture on the article - the monkey profile behind the sunset - that seems interesting. In the US we have become very very sensitive to any link in any way being made between any human from Africa and a monkey. (Hence monkey/ape jokes about Bush were fine and monkey/ape jokes about Obama were not fine.) So, I think it is a good question to ask about the "PC" of this article. In fact, the PC question is so apparent, that 4 pages have been spent trying to shut the conversation down.

BoscoX -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 6:55:44 AM)
Thank you for the thoughtful post I didn't see that image as a chimp profile at all, and I don't believe that it is. what I believe they were trying to say (with the 'cosmic' overlay) was that we have mysterious ancestry Looks more like a homo erectus profile, or another more advanced hominin to me I don't think the science can be discussed here without some howler screaming their usual inanities, which was why I dared bring it up. Why allow them to shut down conversation, and let ignorance itself win

WickedsDesire -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 7:16:12 AM)
Here was me thinking you were doing a credible science thread not your usual bait pish. No-one knows the Origins of man, modern human etc But man will fuk anything that lets him. Human_evolution I have almost no interest in that branch of science. Professor Farnsworth debates Creaturism Is ~~man~~ huwmans a genetic anomaly? star trek aside and whales and dolphins and etc We are a collection of atoms who knows its a collection of atoms

blnymph -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 7:33:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Denier. [:)] Do some research on genetics. To interbreed they must be genetically related. Yes, hominins are related, that's not at issue - read the article I linked to in the OP. http://newatlas.com/ancient-ghost-species-human/50591/?ref=yfp HeavyDrinker pointed out that neanderthals and perhaps others are already known to have interbred with some homo sapiens, so while this is a new discovery the concept itself isn't new or unheard of, or even too surprising. Why is it that nobody howled when it was discovered that neanderthals interbred with Asians and some Caucasians Because neanderthals were Homo sapiens too - easy. Those they obviously happily "interbred" with were Homo sapiens sapiens having migrated to the north from Africa, it seems. Btw cross-species offspring if it ever works (eg mule) is infertile.

longwayhome -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 7:41:01 AM)
Going right back to the OP, there is no can of worms. Human sub-species certainly interbred. This article only highlights one interesting interbreeding that took place. As has been pointed out early Europeans interbred with Neanderthals who were in Europe after a previous migration from Africa and this took place long after the interbreeding referred to in the article. Both humans and Neanderthals had evolved in the time between the two migrations but not enough that they couldn't successfully interbreed. None of us are pure. As far as we know that all modern human have significantly less variation between them (despite different skin colours and facial features) than the difference between the currently identified sub-species. I'm part Neanderthal. So what? I'm still more closely genetically related to sub-Saharan Africans than I am to a Neanderthal. So Boscox, what is the can of worms and what point are you making by trying to stir it?

Musicmystery -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 8:04:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Can of worms here: I thought that "science" had to be more PC than this [image]https://media.eurekalert.org/multimedia_prod/pub/homepage/146099_homepage.jpg[/image] Clue to ancient "ghost species" of humans discovered in saliva A new discovery by a team at the University of Buffalo has revealed the genetic trace of a mysterious, and possibly undiscovered, ancient sub-species of human present in the modern-day genome of Sub-Saharan Africans. The discovery also indicates that interbreeding between ancient human species was a lot more widespread than previously thought. Scientists made the discovery while investigating the origins of the MUC7 protein. This is a mucin protein found in saliva that gives our spit its slimy consistency. A previous study indicated that MUC7 may have conferred an evolutionary advantage in early humans due to its ability in binding to microbes, helping the body rid itself of disease-causing bacteria. In studying the evolution of the protein, the team looked at the MUC7 gene across 2,500 modern human genomes. In a surprising discovery, a drastically different version of the MUC7 gene was found in the genomes of people from Sub-Saharan Africa. "When we looked at the history of the gene that codes for the protein, we see the signature of archaic admixture in modern day Sub-Saharan African populations," says Omer Gokcumen assistant professor of biological sciences in the University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences. This Sub-Saharan MUC7 gene variant was so distinctive that it led researchers to conclude that it was the result of interbreeding with another human species as recently as 150,000 years ago. "This unknown human relative could be a species that has been discovered, such as a subspecies of Homo erectus, or an undiscovered hominin," says Gokcumen. "We call it a 'ghost' species because we don't have the fossils." More Only you could try to spin a new scientific study into something political. Or want to. Another one who has not the slightest clue what science is or does.

heavyblinker -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 9:14:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Denier. [:)] Do some research on genetics. To interbreed they must be genetically related. Yes, hominins are related, that's not at issue - read the article I linked to in the OP. http://newatlas.com/ancient-ghost-species-human/50591/?ref=yfp HeavyDrinker pointed out that neanderthals and perhaps others are already known to have interbred with some homo sapiens, so while this is a new discovery the concept itself isn't new or unheard of, or even too surprising. Why is it that nobody howled when it was discovered that neanderthals interbred with Asians and some Caucasians Nobody is howling about the science now, fucktard. They're mostly reacting to.your reputation and your reasons for pointing it out.

BoscoX -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 9:50:05 AM)
Right - I can tell by the wide acceptance here of the hard cold facts that there is nothing political whatsoever, about acknowledging the results of the study... [:D]

Musicmystery -> RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? (7/25/2017 10:23:06 AM)
That's the weird thing -- no one has any problem with the "hard cold facts," and yet you're still carrying on like there's some controversy. You really are in your own little world.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625