Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:05:48 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Can of worms here: I thought that "science" had to be more PC than this

Clue to ancient "ghost species" of humans discovered in saliva

A new discovery by a team at the University of Buffalo has revealed the genetic trace of a mysterious, and possibly undiscovered, ancient sub-species of human present in the modern-day genome of Sub-Saharan Africans. The discovery also indicates that interbreeding between ancient human species was a lot more widespread than previously thought.

Scientists made the discovery while investigating the origins of the MUC7 protein. This is a mucin protein found in saliva that gives our spit its slimy consistency. A previous study indicated that MUC7 may have conferred an evolutionary advantage in early humans due to its ability in binding to microbes, helping the body rid itself of disease-causing bacteria.

In studying the evolution of the protein, the team looked at the MUC7 gene across 2,500 modern human genomes. In a surprising discovery, a drastically different version of the MUC7 gene was found in the genomes of people from Sub-Saharan Africa.

"When we looked at the history of the gene that codes for the protein, we see the signature of archaic admixture in modern day Sub-Saharan African populations," says Omer Gokcumen assistant professor of biological sciences in the University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences.

This Sub-Saharan MUC7 gene variant was so distinctive that it led researchers to conclude that it was the result of interbreeding with another human species as recently as 150,000 years ago.

"This unknown human relative could be a species that has been discovered, such as a subspecies of Homo erectus, or an undiscovered hominin," says Gokcumen. "We call it a 'ghost' species because we don't have the fossils."

More

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

Post #: 1

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:12:14 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I think its because you are retarded and dont understand simple English. Nothing political or to be correct about. non-humans are not entering into this picture.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 2

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:20:49 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

You only post that because that could be your mom

By "humans" I mean homo sapiens

Those who we today would consider to be modern humans

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 3

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:24:01 PM

tweakabelle

Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

This Sub-Saharan MUC7 gene variant was so distinctive that it led researchers to conclude that it was the result of interbreeding with another human species as recently as 150,000 years ago.

"This unknown human relative could be a species that has been discovered, such as a subspecies of Homo erectus, or an undiscovered hominin," says Gokcumen. "We call it a 'ghost' species because we don't have the fossils."

From your link:
" The discovery also indicates that interbreeding between ancient human species was a lot more widespread than previously thought. http://newatlas.com/ancient-ghost-species-human/50591/?ref=yfp

There's nothing in the linked article about breeding with non-humans you moron. Even though it specifically mentions "interbreeding between ancient human species" twice, your febrile racist imagination has caused you to completely misunderstand what is written. Your racist mind wanted to see something disparaging about Africans so it invented something disparaging about Africans. What a truly vile racist retard you are!

Nothing to see here folks, just Bosco's vicious racism parading itself in all its repulsive ugliness.

_____________________________

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 4

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:30:07 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Despite your ignorant rage they weren't exactly homo sapiens (according to the article)

(Not racism, just the facts, ma'am)

"This unknown human relative could be a species that has been discovered, such as a subspecies of Homo erectus, or an undiscovered hominin," says Gokcumen. "We call it a 'ghost' species because we don't have the fossils."

For reference - an artist's depiction of hominins compared

< Message edited by BoscoX -- 7/24/2017 1:01:17 PM >

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Post #: 5

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:32:58 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

You only post that because that could be your mom

By "humans" I mean homo sapiens

Those who we today would consider to be modern humans

No retard, regardless that your mom was the compound gimp before you, humans do not and have not ever consisted of homo sapiens. (human doesnt even show up in taxa) A large segment of the world population today has Neanderthal and Denisovan genes. Apparently there is more variations to find.
What you consider has never been important to anyone as you are a real well known putinjizz felchgobbler and retard.

It is as politically (and realistically) correct as saying some white person has black in them or some black person has white in them.

You are shitting your pants over nothing but your own ignorance as always.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 6

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:40:29 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

It is always interesting to look into genealogy, despite the leftard howlers' ignorant objections and knuckledragger personal attacks

(The same loons who scream that there are no differences between the genders

)

Its always been obvious that skin color isn't the only difference between the races, and this goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation

Nothing to do with racism, everything to do with science and inquiring, open minds

< Message edited by BoscoX -- 7/24/2017 12:54:15 PM >

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 7

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:42:26 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

then why are you cockgargling about politically correct and felchgobbling putinjizz? the can of worms are actually the strings of putinjizz stuck in your throat.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 8

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:44:38 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

then why are you cockgargling about politically correct and felchgobbling putinjizz? the can of worms are actually the strings of putinjizz stuck in your throat.

Yeah yeah yeah, call me a faggot. Show us all how ugly "tolerant, open minded liberals" are

Don't ever stop posting, felchgoblin man!

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 9

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 12:57:46 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

then why are you cockgargling about politically correct and felchgobbling putinjizz? the can of worms are actually the strings of putinjizz stuck in your throat.

Yeah yeah yeah, call me a faggot. Show us all how ugly "tolerant, open minded liberals" are

Don't ever stop posting, felchgoblin man!

You have called yourself that a trillion times, and its only you calling yourself that, toiletlicker, do a search all we see is Thomas the putinjizz felchgobbler posts calling himself faggot. dont ever stop being a retard and felchgobbling putinjizz because you are unable to do more that that and if you dont you wont remain alive as you and your mother act as the local nazi encampment compound gimps.

Show us all how tolerant nutsuckers are and felchgobble someone other than Il Douchovitch. Say...........Jesse Jackson.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 10

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 1:45:30 PM

heavyblinker

Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

It is always interesting to look into genealogy, despite the leftard howlers' ignorant objections and knuckledragger personal attacks

(The same loons who scream that there are no differences between the genders )

Its always been obvious that skin color isn't the only difference between the races, and this goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation

Nothing to do with racism, everything to do with science and inquiring, open minds

Except everything we know about you suggests you are interested in it because of racism.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 11

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 1:51:43 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

It is always interesting to look into genealogy, despite the leftard howlers' ignorant objections and knuckledragger personal attacks

(The same loons who scream that there are no differences between the genders )

Its always been obvious that skin color isn't the only difference between the races, and this goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation

Nothing to do with racism, everything to do with science and inquiring, open minds

Except everything we know about you suggests you are interested in it because of racism.

Yeah yeah yeah, talk about real science and get called faggot, racist, blah blah blah. I expected it, alt left trash can rarely discuss facts rationally

It's amazing that the study was ever published?

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to heavyblinker)

Post #: 12

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 1:54:28 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Felchgobbler Gobbles retardedly felchgobbling putinjizz is not talking about real science.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 13

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 1:59:07 PM

heavyblinker

Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

It is always interesting to look into genealogy, despite the leftard howlers' ignorant objections and knuckledragger personal attacks

(The same loons who scream that there are no differences between the genders )

Its always been obvious that skin color isn't the only difference between the races, and this goes a long way toward explaining at least a part of that observation

Nothing to do with racism, everything to do with science and inquiring, open minds

Except everything we know about you suggests you are interested in it because of racism.

Yeah yeah yeah, talk about real science and get called faggot, racist, blah blah blah. I expected it, alt left trash can rarely discuss facts rationally

It's amazing that the study was ever published?

It's not amazing, because the conspiracy you desperately need to exist doesn't actually exist.
You aren't interested in the science, you are interested in discussing persecution fantasies and conspiracies to make everything PC.
You want to discuss them because you think that makes them more real.

The only other reason you have for posting this is because you think that a 'liberal' would challenge it or be outraged, and then you could mock them.
This is because you aren't even perceptive enough to know that no one on this board is actually like that.

I think you are racist... not because this article exists, but because I think you are gloating because you think it supports your racist perspective.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 14

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 2:02:04 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

"You you you blah blah blah"

Did maniacalmysery appoint you his designated stalker troll while he is away

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to heavyblinker)

Post #: 15

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 2:06:04 PM

heavyblinker

Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

"You you you blah blah blah"

Did maniacalmysery appoint you his designated stalker troll while he is away

More like 'you you you painful truth that must be ignored'.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 16

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 3:06:44 PM

Wayward5oul

Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

I unblocked just long enough to read the article. With a clickbait title like BozoX gave it, I had to see what kind of alternative facts he was peddling now.

Nothing in the article suggests humans mingled with non humans. That's what the OP is putting out there on his own to further his own vile agenda. Multiple times in the article it referenced all species involved as human.

Characterizing it the way the OP has is beyond attention-seeking trolling. This is pure racism, in all it's disgusting and irredeemable glory.

Impressive job there BozoX, I didn't think my opinion of you could get any lower. But you have managed to sink my opinion of you into depths even I didn't realize I had.

Props.

(in reply to heavyblinker)

Post #: 17

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 3:13:43 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

I unblocked just long enough to read the article. With a clickbait title like BozoX gave it, I had to see what kind of alternative facts he was peddling now.

Nothing in the article suggests humans mingled with non humans. That's what the OP is putting out there on his own to further his own vile agenda. Multiple times in the article it referenced all species involved as human.

Characterizing it the way the OP has is beyond attention-seeking trolling. This is pure racism, in all it's disgusting and irredeemable glory.

Impressive job there BozoX, I didn't think my opinion of you could get any lower. But you have managed to sink my opinion of you into depths even I didn't realize I had.

Props.

Yeah, I really care that leftist trash hates science

So utterly shocking

Breaks my heart right in two, it does

For the nontrolls on here, in my post 3 above I clarified what was meant by the the "nonhuman" wordage, and the article is clear that they meant hominins

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Wayward5oul)

Post #: 18

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 3:24:22 PM

BoscoX

Posts: 11239
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

FR

Meet the hominins

(And if that's racist, then facts and science are racist

)

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 19

RE: Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans? - 7/24/2017 3:26:55 PM

heavyblinker

Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

I unblocked just long enough to read the article. With a clickbait title like BozoX gave it, I had to see what kind of alternative facts he was peddling now.

Nothing in the article suggests humans mingled with non humans. That's what the OP is putting out there on his own to further his own vile agenda. Multiple times in the article it referenced all species involved as human.

Characterizing it the way the OP has is beyond attention-seeking trolling. This is pure racism, in all it's disgusting and irredeemable glory.

Impressive job there BozoX, I didn't think my opinion of you could get any lower. But you have managed to sink my opinion of you into depths even I didn't realize I had.

Props.

Yeah, I really care that leftist trash hates science

So utterly shocking

Breaks my heart right in two, it does

For the nontrolls on here, in my post 3 above I clarified what was meant by the the "nonhuman" wordage, and the article is clear that they meant hominins

Nobody in this thread is complaining about science, or has any objections to the article.
We are complaining about YOU, and objecting to your racism, stupidity and obnoxiousness.

You are posting this because you think it is denigrating sub-Saharan Africans, and this fills you with racist glee.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Post #: 20

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Sub-Saharan Africans Interbred With Nonhumans?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.109