BamaD -> RE: Portland 'Sanctuary' Illegal Rapes Elderly Woman... (8/1/2017 3:03:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker So ICE was after him because of the rapes he hadn't committed yet? Because of the breaking and entering I can only assume he already served time for? No, they were after him for being here illegally, which is not a serious crime. You can't arrest someone based on crimes you think they might commit or because you think their history suggests it could happen. And you don't think he should be deported even though he is a repeat offender of both immigration and criminal law. He has a record that makes him in desirable. Don't you believe that a nation has the right to to set qualifications to enter the country. You clearly do believe in borders. This would mean you do believe in nations. Of course he should be deported. I doubt he will be released from prison any time soon, though. My point is that before the rape, his only crime was being in the US illegally. His crimes were serious enough and numerous enough that he shouldn't have been out. And due to his status ICE should have been notified. Your basic contention is that we do not have the right to control our own borders, which , if true, would mean we have no sovereignty. I was wondering when the strawmen would show up. After someone does their time, they are not a criminal anymore. Local authorities do not enforce immigration law. I HAVE NEVER SAID ANY COUNTRY HAS NO RIGHT TO CONTROL ITS BORDERS. He has committed numerous felonies, if rather than catch and release they had given him reasonable sentences he would still be in jail. If you can't control who comes into the country you have no control of the border.
|
|
|
|