Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 5:32:38 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

From a North Korean perspective his actions make a lot of sense. Their goal is regime survival and he doesn't have many cards to play with. There's no economy to speak of,


Google could disabuse you of your ignorance in this area.

Are you talking about the economy? It's growing, certainly, indeed at a record rate presently, but "North Korea's people are among the world's poorest with per capita gross national income standing at 1.5 million won ($1136; £874) a year. South Korea's per capita income is more than twenty times that." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40679333



The link is from bbc.com????how many reporters do they have on the ground in n.k.?
Isn't bbc.com one of the 'fake news' sites dumb don constantly carps about?
What sort of nonsense is taught in s.k. schools. Is it somehow better than the nonsense taught in n.k. schools?

http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/04/04/521742040/why-do-some-south-koreans-believe-a-myth-that-north-koreans-have-horns

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 6:45:56 AM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline 		FYI- I have never said I thought this man was "crazy".
I can't make that call right now, I agreed with the OP that
he is an asshole.
I rarely read about anyone calling him "crazy", I read about people calling him "dangerous "



_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:28:10 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline 		FR.
I think he threatened to drop some missiles near Guam because that is as far as his missiles will reach.
As for the asshole question, yes he is an asshole.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:35:14 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

FR.
I think he threatened to drop some missiles near Guam because that is as far as his missiles will reach.
As for the asshole question, yes he is an asshole.


Do you remember if he gave a reason for picking guam? Was it because the commander of the bomber base
on guam said he was ready to bomb the shit out of n.k.? Every thing that I have heard him say (that was corroborated) was about retaliation and not a first strike.
Whereas dumb don speaks daily of first strikes as do his military commanders both civilian and uniformed.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:37:32 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

FR.
I think he threatened to drop some missiles near Guam because that is as far as his missiles will reach.
As for the asshole question, yes he is an asshole.

While Guam may be as far as NK missiles will reach, it's also the staging air base where the U.S. flys it's bombers over that part of the world.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/09/what-is-the-us-militarys-presence-in-south-east-asia

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:40:05 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Do you remember if he gave a reason for picking guam?

I don't give a fuck if he did or not, I said "I think". Pay attention.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:43:15 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline 		Whooop-dee fucking doo!
Doesn't change a thing.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:46:51 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Do you remember if he gave a reason for picking guam?


I don't give a fuck if he did or not,


You do not care what he said but you have an opinion about something you do not give a phoque about.

I said "I think". Pay attention.

From the above it is clear that you do not.


(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 7:53:20 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Whooop-dee fucking doo!
Doesn't change a thing.

Well, of course we are all entitled to pick and choose information we want to pay attention to or ignore. Of course, doing so also makes you an idiot when it's pointed out to you and you continue to ignore information because...whoop-dee fucking do is your best intellectual go to position.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 8:26:44 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		Rumours have been circulating a long time - as to what capabilities they have, where they can reach distance wise and with what type of payloads. It is very unlikely they can reach anywhere far and certianly not in great numbers. But that still leaves their next door neighbours (all of them) even with chemical weapons and the infamous dirty bomb(s)

I dont think they have it, but they will soon enough. They certainly dont have a miniaturised one.

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 8:28:19 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Rumours have been circulating a long time - as to what capabilities they have, where they can reach distance wise and with what type of payloads. It is very unlikely they can reach anywhere far and certianly not in great numbers. But that still leaves their next door neighbours (all of them) even with chemical weapons and the infamous dirty bomb(s)

I dont think they have it, but they will soon enough,


Their next door neighbor is china...why would they attack china?

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? - 8/13/2017 8:39:44 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		Because China will attack-invade them, why? Do you think China have been massing troops at their border the last year or so for no reason?

But I was more thinking more all the other neighbors – Kim Insanity would probably have to divvy his bombs 2 a country. But even I know the salvo (short range stuff), pretty much all of it will be aimed at the south in a scorched earth attempt. He simply doesn’t have the ordnance to go around everywhere. But imagine if he did? Time time time...

He launches = war. He has already said he would launch publicly. Will he? Will is people stand behind him. Will his army stand behind him? I dont think any of the two would. The arirforce is utter garbage so they are of no consequence. Conventional sub wise not sure what they have but nothing of consequence.

Kim Jong Il in Team America - Hans Blix


< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 8/13/2017 8:44:12 AM >

_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 32
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is the fat fuck bluffing again about capabilities? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094