puella
Posts: 2457
Joined: 12/2/2004 Status: offline
|
Hello, Satyr6406, I suppose I will take a stab at this. This is why 'submission' s not a gift, in my opinion. Firstly, I do not really use the word that way. I do not hand over 'my submission' in a brightly wrapped package. I am submissive. It is a part of what makes me the person I am. It is also not all of what makes me the person I am. So the word submissive, and all the other workings of that word, just describe a part of me, not something I do or something I play at, really. So in describing myself would I say that my submission, that part of me that is submissive by nature is some sort of 'gift', like my artistic talents or some sort of psychic ability?...No. My reasoning for that part of my answer is that that interpretation of a gift, means something very different to me than something that is completely natural and not honed or improved. I have a natural talent or gift in my singing voice.... I also had to bust my butt to hone it into an art form... the actual voice itself and all that goes with it. I do not hone that ambiguous part of my personality that is submissive, nor do I really need to, it just kicks in all on its own, and it is not something I really have a choice (in many ways) to utilize or not... it is ingrained in everything that I do, to one capacity or another...it's just a part of me, again. Lastly, I do not give anyone my submission, as if it were this very distinct and separate 'thing' which I consciously lay as an offering before someone; a gift. Though, as I have explained above, I am submissive by nature, the totality of being in or under submission to someone (though I really do not term it that way) is a multifaceted situation, none of which I would consider some sort of present to either myself or anyone else. The state of submission requires a lot of give and take between two people. It is a state of being which is brought about equally by the two people who create it, as ne can not be in submission all by themself, no matter how naturally submissive they are. To me that word is very much linked to a M/s relationship, not the submissiveness that is inherent in one of the parties in that relationship. I takes a lot from both partners, not just the submissive, as it is the (for me) Man who brings out such a profoundity of my own submissive nature to bring me to a point of total surrender to him, or submission..... Who is that a gift for, him? or me? I always felt like I was the one who was lucky for, and had been given an immeasurable gift by where he brought me in my submission, not the other way around. But that's just my perspective.
< Message edited by puella -- 7/28/2006 3:39:17 AM >
|