RE: New example of Trump incompetency (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Nnanji -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 8:37:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

I'll just about guarantee you kinkroids, Trump had nothing whatsoever to do with this. China told N. Korea that were all on their own.

Case closed. Trump thankfully, was never going to fire the first shot. The Chinese don't like this un. I am sure they feel this twerp is loose cannon.

Un was playing with house money, the Chinese just...cut him off.

Tin foil hat time. Didn't that cabal of mysterious men meet with trump and let him know what happened to JFK would happen to him if he didn't play ball. Or is that how you know trump had absolutely nothing to do with the situation. You'll have to let us know.

Not only am I correct but it's worse. Trump caved to China to get a UN Res. passed (and a weak one) by foregoing a sect. 301 intellectual property theft investigation. Now Trump is cornered for Chinese support against NK.

Once again, Trump didn't do anything except bumble along as a dupe. Now Xi and Putin both own him.

HERE

So, after further review, you are correct. This really is another example of Trump's incompetency.

And yet, just this morning the news says trump set up a commission to investigate Chinese intellectual theft of property. But, even if what you said was true...ya like that's going to happen...it's been clear for months the U.S. may have to concede some trade issues to China in order to have them play ball helping the U.S. stop nucs flying to Guam. I wonder why your an idiot enough not to have realized that sooner and not criticize trump for preferring some trade issues over Americans being made into crispy critters. Or is it you just have to bitch because you're a hateful person and that's just your thing.



Nnanji -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 8:39:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Of course, we must consider the possibility that Kim just doesn't really have the hardware to get the job done and HAD to back off.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/14454326-b0f3-3a4c-90c8-9e37aaa036bb/newsweek-exclusive%3A-north.html

And yet apparently Obama thinks he does and Susan rice says we'll just have to learn to live with it. I guess when NK gives the technology to Yeman next we'll have to follow Obama's red line plan there as well...and on and on.



mnottertail -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 8:46:27 AM)

well we could go with the Reagan, Bush I, W plan of planting our head in the sand, ass up aught to be real attractive to you nancy. in any case, Il Douchovitch is incompetent and you have pointed it out, not that it needs it. His incompetency is ubiquitous, he's a nutsucker.



Nnanji -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 8:48:41 AM)

Goodness, the insanity meter just pegged with your post. You've been off your meds for a while haven't you?



mnottertail -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 10:09:58 AM)

No nancy you are having septic flashbacks from popping your kotex in and out of your mouth and ass for the nutsuckers down there in the KFC bathroom you work at.

Your retardation and putinjizz felchgobbling is showing, back in with the kotex, nancy. Keep your insanity and sickness contained.



Hillwilliam -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 10:45:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Of course, we must consider the possibility that Kim just doesn't really have the hardware to get the job done and HAD to back off.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/14454326-b0f3-3a4c-90c8-9e37aaa036bb/newsweek-exclusive%3A-north.html

And yet apparently Obama thinks he does and Susan rice says we'll just have to learn to live with it. I guess when NK gives the technology to Yeman next we'll have to follow Obama's red line plan there as well...and on and on.

Any links or are we taking your word for it?



Nnanji -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 12:56:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Of course, we must consider the possibility that Kim just doesn't really have the hardware to get the job done and HAD to back off.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/14454326-b0f3-3a4c-90c8-9e37aaa036bb/newsweek-exclusive%3A-north.html

And yet apparently Obama thinks he does and Susan rice says we'll just have to learn to live with it. I guess when NK gives the technology to Yeman next we'll have to follow Obama's red line plan there as well...and on and on.

Any links or are we taking your word for it?

Been on vacation hillbilly? Old news.



http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/susan-rice-us-can-tolerate-nuclear-weapons-in-north-korea/article/2631128

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/08/09/obama-administration-knew-about-north-koreas-miniaturized-nukes.html

quote:

Tuesday's bombshell Washington Post story that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has determined North Korea is capable of constructing miniaturized nuclear weapons that could be used as warheads for missiles – possibly ICBMs – left out a crucial fact: DIA actually concluded this in 2013. The Post also failed to mention that the Obama administration tried to downplay and discredit this report at the time.



mnottertail -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:06:53 PM)

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/world/asia/north-korea-may-have-nuclear-missile-capability-us-agency-says.html?pagewanted=all

not quite as cut and dried as nutsucker slobberblogging, however.




Nnanji -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:13:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/world/asia/north-korea-may-have-nuclear-missile-capability-us-agency-says.html?pagewanted=all

not quite as cut and dried as nutsucker slobberblogging, however.



That's the way to be mental patient. Go back four and a half years and cherry pick a news article. Actually, it's one of your better attempts to twist an argument to fit the consensus in your head.



mnottertail -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:21:51 PM)

there is no cherry pick there nancy, that is your bloody shitty putinjizz filled kotex blowing back in your face, arent you the KFC toiletlicker talking old news and DIA?

The ACTUAL news is although the DIA estimated this 'capability', most of the intel agencies said that they aint as advanced as it was made out to be,

Why dont you get your kotex back in your ass and your tongue in Il Douchovitches ass, and nurse some more putinjizz, you fucking useless incompetent retard?



Real0ne -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:33:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

How do we get videos of Kim Jung Un but we can't manage to kill him?



Oh thats easy, the same way everone in the me knew where OBL was every second of his life but the US gubmint.

The same way everyone knew about 911 but the US gubmint

The same way everyone knew about pearl harbor but the US gubmint

The same way everyone knew about OKC but the US gubmint

[sm=matrix_smiley.gif]

SSDD
[sm=car.gif]




Edwird -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:52:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: Edwird
If you say so. I'm almost hearing them both say; "Was it good for you, too?"

Trying to equate congenitally puerile Kim with the strong very smart Khrushchev is just silly.

"What sort of validation do you have you got for such an arrogant statement?"


By reading history and current events. The authors were apparently arrogant motherfuckers. Sorry/not sorry.

quote:

Trying to equate the serious Russian nuclear threat and firepower with Kim's firecrackers is just silly.

Kennedy had a 100X more serious issue to deal with, and he saved our ass.


quote:

He 'saved our ass' by doing as kruscheve instructed him to do. Remember the 'deal'... amerika takes her icbm's out of turkey and russia takes her icbm's out of cuba I believe it is called quid pro quo?


Germany worked just as well. Kennedy gave away nothing of consequence.

quote:

Or, if he had anything serious, it still wouldn't get to our shores; the us has ICBMs for days and weeks, and jets for that purpose, and 6.800 nukes to punk-boy's first one.


quote:

How well did those work on 9/11?


Jet planes and nukes broadcast a different beacon. How well does it work stopping suicide bombers with C-4 in their vests vs, granola bars? Stupid fuck.

quote:

And if China were too stupid to stop it themselves, they'd have no room to gripe about the US making geographical glass.


quote:

Why do you think china would allow that?


Where did I say they would? Understand the subjunctive case (and what it means), as clearly established by the word "if."

Quit being an ass.





BoscoX -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 1:56:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

How do we get videos of Kim Jung Un but we can't manage to kill him?


Congress passed a law quite a long time ago, forbidding the assassination of any foreign leader



Edwird -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:04:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I guess when NK gives the technology to Yeman next we'll have to follow Obama's red line plan there as well...and on and on.


Yeah, it's a good thing that Putin's bitch is holding hard against the red line, there.



thompsonx -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:05:33 PM)


ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Congress passed a law quite a long time ago, forbidding the assassination of any foreign leader


The constitution says otherwise.



Made2Obey -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:13:12 PM)

Really????
What part of the Constitution authorizes the assassination of foreign leaders?

Aside from the fact that Congress passed a law making it illegal, the US has signed a UN treaty not to do so.



thompsonx -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:16:44 PM)

ORIGINAL: Edwird
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: Edwird
If you say so. I'm almost hearing them both say; "Was it good for you, too?"

Trying to equate congenitally puerile Kim with the strong very smart Khrushchev is just silly.

"What sort of validation do you have you got for such an arrogant statement?"

By reading history. The authors were apparently arrogant motherfuckers. Sorry/not sorry.


So you have no cite just your ignorant unsubstantiated opinion.

Trying to equate the serious Russian nuclear threat and firepower with Kim's firecrackers is just silly.

Kennedy had a 100X more serious issue to deal with, and he saved our ass.


He 'saved our ass' by doing as kruscheve instructed him to do. Remember the 'deal'... amerika takes her icbm's out of turkey and russia takes her icbm's out of cuba I believe it is called quid pro quo?




Germany worked just as well. Kennedy gave away nothing of consequence.


That is your opinion but once again we have no validation for your ignorant unsubstantiated opinions.

Or, if he had anything serious, it still wouldn't get to our shores; the us has ICBMs for days and weeks, and jets for that purpose, and 6.800 nukes to punk-boy's first one.[/quote]


How well did those work on 9/11?

Jet planes and nukes broadcast a different beacon. How well does it work stopping suicide bombers with C-4 in their vests vs, granola bars? Stupid fuck.


What does one stop an icbm with if not anti missile missiles and aircraft?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

And if China were too stupid to stop it themselves, they'd have no room to gripe about the US making geographical glass.

Why do you think china would allow that?

Where did I say they would? Understand the conjunctive case (and what it means), as clearly established by the word "if."

Quit being an ass.

I asked a question not related to your conjunctive case. If that is too complicated for you perhaps you might ask a grown up to help you.
Here is a hint. What makes you think china would allow amerika to attack korea?



thompsonx -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:19:06 PM)


ORIGINAL: Made2Obey

Really????
What part of the Constitution authorizes the assassination of foreign leaders?

Aside from the fact that Congress passed a law making it illegal, the US has signed a UN treaty not to do so.


Article one section 8 paragraph 11.



sloguy02246 -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:20:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Congress passed a law quite a long time ago, forbidding the assassination of any foreign leader


The constitution says otherwise.




It would appear you are correct. Refer to:

www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/lawreviews/journals/bciclr/26_1/01_FMS.htm

"No standing Federal law criminalizes the assassination of a foreign official outside the boundaries of the United States."



BoscoX -> RE: New example of Trump incompetency (8/15/2017 2:21:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I guess when NK gives the technology to Yeman next we'll have to follow Obama's red line plan there as well...and on and on.


Yeah, it's a good thing that Putin's bitch is holding hard against the red line, there.



What does Hillary have to do with any of this

Or did you mean Obama



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.589844E-02