jlf1961
Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008 From: Somewhere Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods If there's even a scrap of truth to the whole Russian thing, it may well qualify as treason. The bribery thing a good case could be made for as well. Actually, under the US Federal statutes, it would not, as such, qualify as treason. It would qualify as violations of the ethics laws as applicable to political candidates and possibly bribery laws as applicable to public office holders. For it to be treason, he would have to actively aid a country that is the enemy of the United States, and or pass on classified information that has been deemed to have a security value higher than he was authorized to divulge to a foreign government. quote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. U.S. Constitution - Article 3 Section 3 As it stands now, the information he passed to the Russians in the oval office did not actually meet that criteria, and falls into the gray zone of not a very bright thing to do. And a president cannot be impeached for not being very bright. Sorry, but the constitution is very clear on this point. For legal precedence, United States v. Aaron Burr is a good place to start.
_____________________________
Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think? You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of. Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
|