MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 Yes, they could have. There would have been a revolt, and the party would have split right then. I don't know how true that would be. But, the party may still and up split, so was the wait worth it? Let's say half the party supported Trump and the other half didn't. I'm not sure it wouldn't have been better to not nominate him and deal with the consequences back then, rather than wait 4 years for it to happen anyway. But Hilary! (Seriously, they'd have closed ranks behind a nomination for Osama bin Laden's corpse with the late Hugo Chavez as his veep if the alternative was splitting the party at a time when a democrat called Clinton was standing for election, wouldn't they?) I've often used Genghis Khan as the example but your guys will do. But why not, this bitch was more man than Ramses II who had maybe 100 children. Khan, shit...said to have fathered at least 1,000 children, possibly as many as 2,000 from as many as 3000 wives. Poly master of the Gods. Genetic analysis has shown he is a male-line ancestor of 0.5% of the world's population. Yes, there is a 1 in 200 chance that any one man could be a blood descendant of Khan. One of us hey ?
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. J K Galbraith
|