Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Real0ne -> Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:34:07 PM)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoZGOejFEm0


[sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=cheerleader.gif][sm=cheerleader.gif][sm=car.gif][sm=cheering.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=jail.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=prison.gif][sm=prison.gif]




Lucylastic -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:38:46 PM)

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
investigation is different than arrest, moron,

Oh and it was over a month ago,
Fake news




Real0ne -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:42:05 PM)

he said it was already proven in round one woosey, dont piss your pants.




Lucylastic -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:45:26 PM)

LOLOL Im not, you are, as usual
too funny.




DarkRavisher -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:47:20 PM)

Perhaps you could lob in few links paranoid fuzzy one?
Just a thought fukwit.


I look for the good myself. Is there any truth in the you can crawl behind the u-bend like some mad rat bastard and feast on jobbies?




WhoreMods -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 2:57:47 PM)

He'd have to find somebody who'd agree to let him eat their shit first, though. The odds are against that.




MrRodgers -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 4:17:45 PM)

Nothing but an ad hominum attack by a very partisan R congressman.




BamaD -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 5:10:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Nothing but an ad hominum attack by a very partisan R congressman.

Everyone knows they are both Dems and couldn't possibly have done anything wrong.




jlf1961 -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 5:14:01 PM)

Every politician in dc past and present were crooks, arrest em all.




BamaD -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 5:20:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Every politician in dc past and present were crooks, arrest em all.

Hope your not looking for an argument.




BoscoX -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 5:25:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoZGOejFEm0


[sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=celebrating-smileys.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=champ.gif][sm=cheerleader.gif][sm=cheerleader.gif][sm=car.gif][sm=cheering.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=fiddle_smiley.gif][sm=jail.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=yahoo.gif][sm=prison.gif][sm=prison.gif]


Everybody knows it's the truth, but there are some rabid partisans (and a few idiots) who refuse to admit it




Lucylastic -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 5:51:23 PM)

prove it big boy




Lucylastic -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 7:17:48 PM)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-investigations/republican-attempt-to-deflect-trump-russia-probes-could-backfire-sources-idUSKCN1BM25G
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-4873576/Republican-attempt-deflect-Trump-Russia-probes-backfire-sources.html
By Mark Hosenball
Sept 11 (Reuters) - Republican lawmaker Devin Nunes' investigation into whether Obama administration officials used classified intelligence reports to discredit Donald Trump's 2016 campaign team could backfire on the congressman - and the president, sources familiar with the reports said.
The reports contain no evidence that any aides to former Democratic President Barack Obama acted improperly, the sources said, but they do indicate some Trump associates may have violated an obscure 1799 law, the Logan Act, which prohibits unauthorized U.S. citizens from negotiating with a foreign government that has a dispute with the United States.
The spying reports also are relevant to the investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into conclusions by U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia worked to tilt last November's election in Republican Trump's favor, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Mueller's office declined to comment.
Russia, under U.S. sanctions for rights abuses and its 2014 annexation of Crimea, has repeatedly denied allegations of election meddling. Trump has denied any possible collusion between his campaign and Moscow, an issue that has loomed over the new presidency.
Nunes, chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee and a Trump ally, met secretly earlier this year with a White House intelligence aide and then accused Obama officials of having requested the names of U.S. citizens seen in intercepts of communications with Russians and other foreigners.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment.
The names would have been routinely censored from intelligence agency intercepts, but Nunes charged that Obama's aides had leaked the information to try to undermine Trump while he was running for president.
A spokesman for then-United Nations ambassador Samantha Power, whom Nunes and other Republicans accused of digging for political dirt, said she read intelligence reports only as part of her normal duties. A spokesman for former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice, whom Republicans also accused of misusing intelligence, did not respond to requests for comment.
Mueller is investigating meetings and conversations between Trump associates and Russian and other foreign officials and businessmen. They include Trump's adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; the president's eldest son Donald Trump, Jr.; former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
"An obvious question is how all these meetings and conversations were set up," said one of the sources. "Who set them up? What was their purpose? What were the agendas? Who approved them? Who was briefed on them afterward? Signals intelligence might shed some light on that."
Representatives for the Trump associates did not respond to requests for comment.
Democratic lawmakers have said that Nunes and others have made the assertions about the leaks to distract attention from two congressional investigations and Mueller's probe into the Russian matter.
The National Security Agency masks the names of U.S. citizens in intercepts, but officials with the necessary security clearances can request them for intelligence purposes.
"Unmasking Americans is extremely sensitive, and unmasking political opponents is really problematic," said a congressional official, also speaking on the condition of anonymity. If Obama officials asked for the names or failed to justify any requests, that warranted investigation, the official said.
Asked for hard evidence that Power or other aides misused intelligence for political purposes or leaked such information to the media, the official declined to comment.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 7:22:20 PM)

FR to the OP If that is what you think the article says, you need to be locked up.




Real0ne -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 7:46:35 PM)

fr to the cheap garden hose, there is no article posted in the OP, he stated they have enough to arrest them both from comeys first report.

feel free to egglmacate yerself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoZGOejFEm0




vincentML -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 8:06:58 PM)

The well honored tradition in Western democracies is that members of the previous Administration are never considered for arrest. Our political ethics save us from being a Banana Republic. Members of the Bush administration were not jailed for the crimes they committed in attacking Iraq and for sanctioning torture. Their crimes were incredibly conspicuous. If anybody deserved to be jailed, in my opinion, it would be members of the Bush administration. They engineered the deaths of thousands of American troops and hundreds of thousands of Iraq civilians. And yet they were not prosecuted, because that’s what America does not do. So, the OP is bullshit. It flies in the face of long time American political traditions.




Real0ne -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 8:30:21 PM)

ah yes time honored tradition......we're gubmint, we're criminals, fuck you.




vincentML -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 9:02:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

ah yes time honored tradition......we're gubmint, we're criminals, fuck you.

What is your alternative? Shall we all become sovereign citizens and deny the legitimacy of our governments? They are all criminals? Really? There are no honest and dedicated members in Congress and in the Administration? Beyond that, the implied immunity offered to the outgoing Administration is the grease that provides for a peaceful transfer of power. On Inauguration Day we do not see armored vehicles and tanks in the streets as you might see in some Latin American or African countries. You may not like the previous Administration and obviously you think everybody is a crook, but what you think of them politically is really not important. On Inauguration Day it is time to start anew peacefully and without rancor. That is a very big deal in the exchange of power in a democracy or in a Democratic Republic, whichever suits you.




heavyblinker -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 9:03:52 PM)

What a pathetic attempt to level the playing field.




Real0ne -> RE: Congress demands Arrest of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (9/11/2017 10:10:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

ah yes time honored tradition......we're gubmint, we're criminals, fuck you.

What is your alternative? Shall we all become sovereign citizens and deny the legitimacy of our governments? They are all criminals? Really? There are no honest and dedicated members in Congress and in the Administration? Beyond that, the implied immunity offered to the outgoing Administration is the grease that provides for a peaceful transfer of power. On Inauguration Day we do not see armored vehicles and tanks in the streets as you might see in some Latin American or African countries. You may not like the previous Administration and obviously you think everybody is a crook, but what you think of them politically is really not important. On Inauguration Day it is time to start anew peacefully and without rancor. That is a very big deal in the exchange of power in a democracy or in a Democratic Republic, whichever suits you.


A republican government is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.

...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves..... [CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472.]


The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. [Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.]

The very meaning of 'sovereignty' is that the decree of the sovereign makes law. [American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.]





Whats your point vince?




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.640625E-02