jlf1961
Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008 From: Somewhere Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji I wasn't going to say anything because I don't have significant on sight knowledge like jif must have, but you're exactly right. I've sat in the emergency planning room during a disaster and watched my congressman pull his hair out because he could do absolutely nothing until the locals officially asked for help. We don't have that situation with Haiti. Also, as it appears, and you state, there is stuff there but no way to distribute it with the devastation of the infrastructure. Nobody is sitting around saying let the brown people suffer. That's absurd. It's pure political spite. If you had watched the interview with the guy that turned the Katrina response around, you would understand some of the issues that are the direct result of white house inaction. Within two days of the storm passing, the reports by both territorial and FEMA people on the ground were dire. President Trump did not hold a cabinet meeting on the situation for a full five days after the storm, he did however find time for a game of golf and his twitter account. Formal requests by territorial and FEMA personnel had been made, but could not be acted on without presidential authorization, which, again did not really start going until after the cabinet meeting on Monday. The retired general had this to say on Trump's reference to the mayor of San Juan being a poor leader, and the president's actions The first word he used was "Bullshit" His response to "its a text book case for response" was "Not in any book I have read on disaster response." His best line about the mayor is, "She is sleeping on a cot Mr. President, I hope you enjoyed your golf game." Sorry, but when you consider his lack of immediate response, waiting five days to hold a cabinet meeting on the situation, and the fact that if Obama had been this slow in his actions dealing with Hurricane Sandy (which he wasnt, he had a cabinet meeting within hours of the first reports) he would have been attacked and worse. Instead people are defending his slow response and at least one has suggested the entire population of the island should have evacuated or stocked up on food, basically blaming the citizens of Puerto Rico for the crisis they are facing. Oh, and the normally critical anti Trump fact checking site has already defended and proved charges that the Trump administration is price guaging the people trying to leave the island and that Trump's business dealings with a now bankrupt golf course and resort was not the reason the territory had a 33 million dollar uncollectable debt, that some dems are swearing to. About the price gouging charge, the US State Department and Department of Territorial affairs are those who would foot the bill for anyone leaving the island, and it is standard procedure to hold the passports until a promissory note is signed by anyone asking for help leaving the island from those two agencies, and the cost of the ticket is largely discounted since it is purchased through the US government and they buy a lot of airline tickets for agency and elected official use. As for the debt, Trump's company entered into a management agreement with the resort parent company with no assumption of liability for any outstanding debts owed by the resort owner for the soul purpose of trying to get the business back on a secure financial footing. Trump's management company got out of the agreement when it became clear that the owners would not heed advice or follow instructions given. Three months after getting out of the contract, the resort went bankrupt. In other words, Trump was approached with save us, and since he and his board were not stupid enough to throw money at the problem (since the owners would not part with any of their percentages of ownership) and instead offered sound financial and management advice which was ignored, they got out. What these dems trying to blame Trump for the debt fail to admit, is that he did the wise thing and since he was smart enough not to put money into a mismanaged failing prospect, he is not responsible for the debt. they also do not wish to admit that Donald Trump offered to buy the resort outright and was turned down, was turned down at his offer to buy and assume the debt for a 51% ownership share. Personally if I were Trump, at that point I would have walked away. But hey, while I will blame Trump for many things, this is one that I will freely admit that he is not responsible for. It is also interesting to note, that the occasions when he actually wanted to extend his resort holdings to Puerto Rico, even offering to invest in infrastructure updating, he was fought tooth and nail by the previous San Juan mayor while the present mayor actually welcomed the possibility for the investment in the territory's infrastructure. For all his faults, I will admit that Trump had some philanthropic, although selfish for his own businesses, actions that improved utility infrastructures in areas where he built hotels or high rises. Which were praised at the time, but now, since he has been elected president, have been vilified by the same people.
_____________________________
Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think? You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of. Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
|