RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances

RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 6:55:36 PM)
quote: Says the prudish old puritan nun (You do realize that this is a perv kink website site you are on, right) yes where consent is the norm, and required, even just the once.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:02:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Threatening to sue in no way establishes innocence. If anything, threatening to sue and failing to follow through with the law suit, as Trump has done, tends to give more weight to the accusations that have been made against him. Absolutely not true. IF a woman falsely accuse you of raping and molesting her. He would have to go to court and demand she provide PROOF! The LAST thing he should do is pay her off to shut up. Because he will be exonerated if the court deem him not guilty. While it's important to protect women, but there are many men who have been falsefully accused of rape and molestation too. And they need an avenue to defend themselves. IF women wanna accuse someone of molest or rape, they need fucking evidence, and if they can prove it, they have no fear of lawsuits. IF not! Then how is there suppose to be justice? IF it's not based on evidence and just based in claims? There has to be a proper legal channel to decide all these things, especially when women are throwing claims around. The reason why Weinstein was accepted as guilty, is because he paid 8 women off. That's alot of women. Whereas with Trump, he hasn't silence anybody. He only challenged them to prove it in court. And none of the women could prove their allegations. Also the timing of the allegations seem to be a Leftist strategy of planting these women to derail his election. Why didn't these women come out a damn long time ago!

BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:02:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: Says the prudish old puritan nun (You do realize that this is a perv kink website site you are on, right) yes where consent is the norm, and required, even just the once. Your fellow howler troll ManiacalMysery once bragged that many here nonconsensually beat their women (in defense of Muslims) http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4993421 You never breathed a word about it, naturally

Nnanji -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:11:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874 What green berets in Niger Lucy ? I've missed that item and if so, what were they DOING in Niger ( apart from the obvious smile) Training locals to fight the local terrorists. That's pretty much the job description of the Green Berets.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:18:29 PM)
FR This Harvey Weinstein incident really show me the power of Leftism over the media. Because Harvey is a Leftist, NBC protected him, many throughout the years protected him. And even though now he is exposed. Even Late Night Show Hosts are avoiding the issue and kinda either saying very little or keeping silence. Yet, all of them are busy talking about Eminem lyrics against Trump. It's disgusting. As Rose McGowan said, "YOU ALL KNEW!" Claim she was raped multiple times by Harvey. And yes, Harvey did pay her off to keep quiet. And Leftist Twitter silence her account, UNTIL protest lead to her voice being restored again. It's just absolutely crazy. I seriously laugh at the other poor NBC, Trump trying to curb their Freedom of Speech. Which is the party that is truly against Freedom of Speech?

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:23:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: Says the prudish old puritan nun (You do realize that this is a perv kink website site you are on, right) yes where consent is the norm, and required, even just the once. Your fellow howler troll ManiacalMysery once bragged that many here nonconsensually beat their women (in defense of Muslims) http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4993421 You never breathed a word about it, naturally his direct quote from that link... quote: You do realize that many of us on this forum beat our women as we see fit . . . That doesnt mean that there is no consent, LOL CNC is also part of it....he doesnt mention consent or non consent, sooo please tell me how "he bragged non consensuality"? your reaching for uranus again.. DO you really know how BDSM works? Non consent is abuse,. BUT it seems you dont subscribe to that belief.

Drakvampire -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 7:32:44 PM)
muts

JVoV -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 9:46:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 FR This Harvey Weinstein incident really show me the power of Leftism over the media. Because Harvey is a Leftist, NBC protected him, many throughout the years protected him. And even though now he is exposed. Even Late Night Show Hosts are avoiding the issue and kinda either saying very little or keeping silence. Yet, all of them are busy talking about Eminem lyrics against Trump. It's disgusting. As Rose McGowan said, "YOU ALL KNEW!" Claim she was raped multiple times by Harvey. And yes, Harvey did pay her off to keep quiet. And Leftist Twitter silence her account, UNTIL protest lead to her voice being restored again. It's just absolutely crazy. I seriously laugh at the other poor NBC, Trump trying to curb their Freedom of Speech. Which is the party that is truly against Freedom of Speech? I haven't read anything claiming McGowan was raped more than once. I think she avoided him completely after the first time. And I really don't think it's a leftist media plot that protected Weinstein for so long. It's a rich white men with power victimize younger people who are just trying to work in the business, but may never get a chance if they say a word. It's Barbara Walters shutting down Corey Feldman as he spoke out against pedophilia in Hollywood on The View. It's Ben Affleck grabbing an MTV Host's boob. It's praising Roman Polanski at the Oscars. It's requiring senseless nude scenes for actresses, while actors rarely have to show skin. It's Rose McGowan's agent telling her she needs to wear a push-up bra for an audition for some stupid Adam Sandler movie. It's most rap videos.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 10:54:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV It's Ben Affleck grabbing an MTV Host's boob. I will exonerate Ben Affeck for that MTV Host incident, as the "victim" spoke out and said it was consensual. She didn't feel violated. She clearly was still good friends with Affleck after that, and it was consensual flirting.

JVoV -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/12/2017 11:37:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV It's Ben Affleck grabbing an MTV Host's boob. I will exonerate Ben Affeck for that MTV Host incident, as the "victim" spoke out and said it was consensual. She didn't feel violated. She clearly was still good friends with Affleck after that, and it was consensual flirting. That goes against what she's been saying on Twitter about the incident. And what she said in this video.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 12:43:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV It's Ben Affleck grabbing an MTV Host's boob. I will exonerate Ben Affeck for that MTV Host incident, as the "victim" spoke out and said it was consensual. She didn't feel violated. She clearly was still good friends with Affleck after that, and it was consensual flirting. That goes against what she's been saying on Twitter about the incident. And what she said in this video. You are referring to the TRL incident right? http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/female-tv-presenter-defends-ben-11328833 Oh, it's two different girls. I got them mix up. Well, okay, he is in the shit bin again, if he really did that! I always hated that he is Batman!

Drakvampire -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 3:07:19 AM)
I got a little bit out of hand the other night? I do apologise and I hope you can all forgive me for that (Please)? Well you serious ones. But I do not understand this obsession with Hillary and I would like someone to explain that to me. Understand my papers are full of Cyril Smith and Ted Heath

Drakvampire -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 3:14:47 AM)
Perhaps he could come on here and repeat that to me? Does anyone on here like to beat their women, or man? Now I ask this: 1. Is Beating allowed? 2. If beating someone is called a fetish is it allowed.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 4:15:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire Now I ask this: 1. Is Beating allowed? 2. If beating someone is called a fetish is it allowed. Beating is allowed only if you were given permission by the person whom you want to beat to beat them. Like sometimes, I am sure you might have some male friend who goes like, 'I'm an idiot, punch me please? I mean it!" And then he thanks you after you punch him for waking him the fuck up.

BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 5:19:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Yet, all of them are busy talking about Eminem lyrics against Trump. Leftist trash suck his ass, too - even knowing how he raps about raping bitches and whores etc "Ain't no one safe from, non-believers there ain't none I even make the bitches I rape cum--."

BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 5:21:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: Says the prudish old puritan nun (You do realize that this is a perv kink website site you are on, right) yes where consent is the norm, and required, even just the once. Your fellow howler troll ManiacalMysery once bragged that many here nonconsensually beat their women (in defense of Muslims) http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4993421 You never breathed a word about it, naturally his direct quote from that link... quote: You do realize that many of us on this forum beat our women as we see fit . . . That doesnt mean that there is no consent, LOL CNC is also part of it....he doesnt mention consent or non consent, sooo please tell me how "he bragged non consensuality"? your reaching for uranus again.. DO you really know how BDSM works? Non consent is abuse,. BUT it seems you dont subscribe to that belief. So, your pretending that it's all about consensuality here makes it a respectable site in your puritan nun eyes then What a great laugh you are, please keep posting your idiocy It's hilarious

Drakvampire -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 5:31:04 AM)
I have exactly no male friends. And I would never beat beautiful women with my soft, yet firm hands shimmering in knuckledusters for I am a fucking gent. Granted I may smash their faces in with a brick, and if they looked one day over 21 I would hire a steam roller out to iron out the disgusting age lines. I like beautiful women would you begrudge me that?

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 6:01:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: Says the prudish old puritan nun (You do realize that this is a perv kink website site you are on, right) yes where consent is the norm, and required, even just the once. Your fellow howler troll ManiacalMysery once bragged that many here nonconsensually beat their women (in defense of Muslims) http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4993421 You never breathed a word about it, naturally his direct quote from that link... quote: You do realize that many of us on this forum beat our women as we see fit . . . That doesnt mean that there is no consent, LOL CNC is also part of it....he doesnt mention consent or non consent, sooo please tell me how "he bragged non consensuality"? your reaching for uranus again.. DO you really know how BDSM works? Non consent is abuse,. BUT it seems you dont subscribe to that belief. So, your pretending that it's all about consensuality here makes it a respectable site in your puritan nun eyes then What a great laugh you are, please keep posting your idiocy It's hilarious Are you saying that consent isnt part of the "lifestyle"? Are you saying that RACK or SSC isnt part of the "lifestyle"? when consent is in both of those Acronyms? You dont know what consensual non consent means??? respectable?? where did that come from?, LOL Im pretty sure there are lots of posters here, left and right and moderate that would disagree with you??? I should start a poll.

BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 6:13:58 AM)
I am saying you are fucking insane Very conveniently ignoring what ManiacalMysery posted, pretending the meaning of his words are the exact opposite of what he intended them to mean Pretending that everyone here is all about consensual sex Hysterically insane What a laugh

Drakvampire -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/13/2017 6:21:32 AM)
and what do you say of me?

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625