RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances

RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

JVoV -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 12:09:08 AM)
Oh. So you know what she was doing all weekend? Or even where she was? Are you also going to ignore the possibility that Weinstein's scandal may have been something that she needed time to process before making a public statement? She's known him for how long? 20 years or so? And I really have no idea what HRC's normal online times are. No interest in any of that, and I'm hoping she doesn't run again.

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 12:39:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Are you also going to ignore the possibility that Weinstein's scandal may have been something that she needed time to process before making a public statement? She's known him for how long? 20 years or so? Precisely, they are close friends. That's why the initial silence, until the pressure her own party puts on her to say something. She probably didn't expect her own party to BE THE ONES bringing up her silence.

Dvr22999874 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 12:48:52 AM)
JVoV.......surely she shouldn't NEED time to process anything at all before she responds to it ?? After all, President Trump doesn't . He has an answer for most things IMMEDIATELY !! The fact that they may be a totally wrong or inappropriate answer, are beside the point. They are an IMMEDIATE answer. What more could the world want ?

Greta75 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 1:59:42 AM)
A man who paid 8 women off. Yup, that needs alot of time to contemplate. Hillary is slow then, if she needs so much time to figure out that "This is bad!" What she needed was the time to figure out how to word things so that she does not look like she is betraying Weinstein too. After all, Weinstein has done so much for her and her husband. And even was the financier during Clinton financial crisis time, when he was fighting his own sexual harassment cases. He covered all of Bill's lawyer fees. I totally remembered how Hillary said they were so broke because of fighting all the sexual harassment cases at that time. Weinstein to their rescue. And seriously, I am only attacking her because she attack Trump for being like a woman abuser or something, and yet here she is. True colours. I will never forget that she accuse a 12 yr old of seducing the pedophilia that raped her. And hiding behind that it was her job to do that. She was never FOR women!

bounty44 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 3:45:48 AM)
is there really any doubt had this been a prominent republican Hillary would have been leading or at least joining the charge right out of the gate? great cans of worms get opened when either side gets involved in the politics of personal destruction.

Hillwilliam -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 4:52:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why didnt trump get help to 3 million people in puerto rico faster? Because they're Brown

JVoV -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:06:49 AM)
I dunno. Rocks, glass houses? Frankly, I don't see how she had the balls to stay in politics after her husband left office. Other than the fact that there was no Twitter then.

bounty44 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:07:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why didnt trump get help to 3 million people in puerto rico faster? Because US is broke. AIG was saying that, all the hurricane damages is 3 billion pay out alone for insurance claims. You know such things are damn expensive. And you know what? US should seriously release puerto rico and let them be their own country. Why the hell is that part of the USA? heck no greta, haven't you learned yet? its because everyone in the right is a raaaaaaaaaaaaacist. no answer, however legitimate, will erase that fundamental position. when you find the comrades saying things like "he was too worried about the NFL to care" (as if he cannot do both??), you know they are incapable of rational discussion.

bounty44 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:12:38 AM)
I mentioned in another thread I own municipal bonds which are invested in Puerto rico. the semi-annual report has a number of pages dedicated to the situation there (prior to the hurricanes) and there was a paragraph saying there was a recent vote in which the overwhelming majority of voters, although only ~1/4 of the electorate voted, wanted statehood for Puerto rico.

bounty44 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:16:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV I dunno. Rocks, glass houses?... yes, that's pretty much my point. all of humanity is fallen and there will always be people on either side of the political spectrum who do something criminal, or immoral. and so to demagogue any particular person, or party, who does so, is really to miss the point.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:20:06 AM)
Could be, but keep in mind that they also vote overwhelmingly Democrat.

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:23:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV I dunno. Rocks, glass houses?... yes, that's pretty much my point. all of humanity is fallen and there will always be people on either side of the political spectrum who do something criminal, or immoral. and so to demagogue any particular person, or party, who does so, is really to miss the point. you forgot to say oh no comradws

Wayward5oul -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 5:29:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV I dunno. Rocks, glass houses?... yes, that's pretty much my point. all of humanity is fallen and there will always be people on either side of the political spectrum who do something criminal, or immoral. and so to demagogue any particular person, or party, who does so, is really to miss the point. And yet you have repeatedly claimed that liberals are the enemy.

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 6:28:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic sexual harassment and groping.... https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/in-light-of-harvey-weinstein-heres-the-list-of-trumps-accusers-who-he-promised-to-sue/ http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/james-obrien/james-obrien-lays-out-the-sexual-harassment-claims/ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/trump-sexual-assault-accuser-slams-women-day-tweets-article-1.2992178 http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a5128852/jill-harth-donald-trump-assault-ivanka-bedroom/ Its YOU ignoring it, Yup, he paid off none of them. Move along. Suing someone is not an admission of guilt. It's literally defending your honour. move along? you are the one who wants to smear hillary as a culprit in this, and she isnt the one being accused of sexual harassment or rape, She ISNT the one who may be guilty of SH, or SA or rape The men maybe. Honour? he has none, he made the remarks about grabbing pussy and "having to kiss" beautiful women. you scream about hillary as if she had control over them, as if she is responsible, the men arent, why is that? Trump is just defending his honour? no he has threatened to sue them, and the NY times,by making more disparaging comments. Mind you he has so many suits against him, Im pretty sure he has a lot more to come. It s your veil of bullshit that is precisely the problem.

JVoV -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 7:14:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV I dunno. Rocks, glass houses?... yes, that's pretty much my point. all of humanity is fallen and there will always be people on either side of the political spectrum who do something criminal, or immoral. and so to demagogue any particular person, or party, who does so, is really to miss the point. I think there's going to be a lot more accusations and revelations throughout Hollywood in the coming weeks. Victims are ready to name names, and people are ready to believe them.

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 7:32:42 AM)
its about time. its a shame that most responses will be blaming the victims for not shouting loud enough, even tho the casting couch has been a problem for MEN and WOMEN since its inception, which is almost a hundred years..

BoscoX -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 10:55:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Honour? he has none, he made the remarks about grabbing pussy and "having to kiss" beautiful women. How much of a prudish puritan angelic nun are you really prepared to pretend to be, hag [:D] They were groupies, who sought the attention Despite your childish imagination it was CONSENSUAL No one has ever credibly claimed otherwise, and the only "victims" who ever did claim otherwise worked for the Hillary campaign

bounty44 -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 11:10:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Honour? he has none, he made the remarks about grabbing pussy and "having to kiss" beautiful women. How much of a prudish puritan angelic nun are you really prepared to pretend to be, hag [:D] They were groupies, who sought the attention Despite your childish imagination it was CONSENSUAL No one has ever credibly claimed otherwise, and the only "victims" who ever did claim otherwise worked for the Hillary campaign I said this earlier in the thread and it bears repeating: what never ceases to amaze me is the comrades willingness to believe lies, or their inability to tell the truth. either way... much like the made up gingrich story, the context of trump's statement has been repeatedly explained and way the left wants to interpret it, debunked. but it just doesn't matter does it? was just recently listening to an old dr hook and the medicine show song, "cover of the rolling stone": "we got a lotta little teenage blue-eyed groupies who will do anything we say..." lets throw the book at 'em!

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 11:35:06 AM)
we know your issue with barely legal women too And Bosco like scaring little girls.

Lucylastic -> RE: I knew Hillary is FOS about her "pro-woman" stances (10/11/2017 11:39:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Honour? he has none, he made the remarks about grabbing pussy and "having to kiss" beautiful women. How much of a prudish puritan angelic nun are you really prepared to pretend to be, hag [:D] They were groupies, who sought the attention Despite your childish imagination it was CONSENSUAL No one has ever credibly claimed otherwise, and the only "victims" who ever did claim otherwise worked for the Hillary campaign im not a prude, or religious, never have been a prude and never will be I dont pretend to be either. so shove it in your ass. Consensual, yes thats why 15 women have claimed it was non consensual. I like consent. BTW Thats why trump tried to blame hillary for Bills pecadillos. to distract from his own.... you like to bring up the groupies...why havent you done so for weinstein?

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875