Nnanji -> RE: The right (repubs) have little regard for parts of the BoR (10/11/2017 10:57:09 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Seems it's now the new American fascism is in its second trimester...soon (give it maybe 10-20 years) we will see it even more in the street where policies begin to change lives even more. Republicans aren't so supportive of the BoR when it suits them and much more so than society as a whole. .....Many conservatives admit to favoring policies that would proscribe the rights of Muslims, journalists, and those who "disrespect" the United States. .....72 percent of Republicans would support making it illegal for an American to burn or desecrate the flag. A little more than half of Republicans would punish the desecrators by stripping them of their U.S. citizenship, something Donald Trump suggested (to great and deserved indignation) a few weeks after he won the election last November. ....."people should be allowed to express unpopular opinions in public, even those that are deeply offensive to other people," compared to less than five in 10 Democrats. Nonetheless, 36 percent of Republicans would support prohibiting offensive public statements aimed at the police, and the same number would ban such comments aimed at the military. By comparison, just 24 percent would outlaw offensive speech aimed at gays, lesbians, and transgender people. .....Despite constant declamations from the right on the importance of religious freedom, 67 percent of Republicans favor a law to "prohibit face coverings in public spaces." Nearly half would ban the construction of mosques in their community. That is much higher than among all Americans (28 percent) and among Democrats only (14 percent). .....It's also directly contrary to constitutional protections agaainst laws that discriminate against certain faith groups. .....colleges should handle students who disrupt invited speakers in the manner of last week's rightly maligned protest at the College of William and Mary, 65 percent of poll respondents thought that hecklers should be disciplined in some way. But about one-third (32 percent) of GOPers thought schools should actually have the police arrest disorderly students. Among all participants in the survey, that number was closer to one-fifth (19 percent). .....50 percent of Republicans say the press in America has too much freedom to do what it wants. Just 31 percent of all respondents felt the same way. Republicans also appear to be following the president's lead on a related question: By 63–35 percent, they say journalists are "an enemy of the American people." Among everyone who took the survey, those numbers were flipped. (The Left: Two in three (66%) believe offensive speech constitutes an act of violence, and the same number feel that college administrators "have an obligation to protect students from speech and ideas that could create a difficult learning environment." These answers represent a frightening departure on the American left from a longstanding consensus reflected in the famous aphorism that you need not agree with what somebody says in order to support her right to say it.) However, the right: Yet the departures on the right may be even more noteworthy, particularly given how much pleasure conservatives (the right) take in decrying the behavior of their political adversaries. In fact, 72 percent of Republicans in the poll said that colleges and universities are not doing enough "to teach young Americans about the value of free speech," and 90 percent think political correctness is "a big problem this country has." But it's hard (for the right) to claim a position of moral authority on the First Amendment when, at the same time, [they] approve of government force to punish those who speak, dress, protest, or worship in a manner you don't like. A brief methodological aside: The Cato study I'm dissecting here was conducted in partnership with YouGov, a highly respected British web-based polling firm. HERE As we all know or should know, this is your right today and has been developing since Reagan. Ya, checked your source. No access to the poll or poll data and it appears you've edited some of what your source says. Tin foil hat time once again. thats strange... cos I followed his sources and found this.... https://www.cato.org/blog/poll-61-oppose-firing-nfl-players-who-refuse-stand-national-anthem-65-republicans-say-players oh and theres a link to the topline pdf for methodology and poll https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/wp-content/uploads/cato_free_speech_and_tolerance_2017_nflplayers.pdf and I found it within the last 15 minutes(your time stamp) Both your links are to one question about the NFL. Nothing about what MrRogers is saying. So my previous comment stands. no, one link is to cato talking about the poll mentioned in the OP and one is the link to the actual poll in the OP, thats all you asked for thats all you got. Your demands should be more concise There you are, this is an entire post that sums up most of your idiocy. One link that has a couple of paragraphs, the MrRogers edited, regarding an entire poll. On link that discusses methodology for one poll question regarding NFL players. And you actually believe all of MrRogers BS can be verified with that. No wonder you never participate in discussions. You say it's because you don't participate in discussions you know nothing about. This pretty much both proves you wrong and shows the extent of which you no nothing. Then, ""I Demanded"? I did no such thing. I pointed out that MrRogers wasn't providing information that we could examine ourselves. If you think that is "demanding" you lead a sorry sad life beset on all sides by people attacking you. Which, as my comment was directed to MrRogers and had nothing to do with you, wasn't what I did even if your silly little phobias make it seem so to you. Now, perhaps you could (notice this is not a demand) read what you linked and tell me where the questions regarding the Bill of Rights are listed so me may all determine if the questions asked are actually relevant to what the OP posted.
|
|
|
|