Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n.

Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrRodgers -> Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 11:46:41 AM)
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A California woman (Paige Gasper, 21) wounded in the mass shooting at a Las Vegas music festival has filed a lawsuit against the operators of the hotel where the gunman fired from, the festival organizers and the maker of a device that allowed weapons to be fired at a near-automatic rate. Hit by a round (or rounds) that entered the college student’s right arm and traveled through her side, shattering her ribs and damaging her liver before exiting her right side. Such claims would have to survive a law passed by U.S. Congress in 2005 that shields manufacturers of firearms, component parts or ammunition from liability if their products are used to commit a crime. Legal experts said it was not clear whether the component parts definition applied to bump stock devices. HERE Is this or anymore law suits...going anywhere ? Lawyers think as usual and correctly so, once in court, everything becomes subject to the interpretations of the court.

WhoreMods -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 11:52:42 AM)
The hotel are probably completely fucked if she can't sue the corpse or the munitions manufacturers who tooled him up.

MrRodgers -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 12:25:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods The hotel are probably completely fucked if she can't sue the corpse or the munitions manufacturers who tooled him up. I was thinking the same thing. So I guess we should soon expect a new federal law...exempting them too. (K. St., here we come) Too late for this liability. Wifey could end up broke though.

MrRodgers -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 12:26:58 PM)
Oops

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 1:08:01 PM)
You are clearly an hysterical leftist, as trump would say when he is not shooting up random people aged 0-110 of fifth avenue who clearly deserve it, for no other reason than for him to prove he is a total mad insane bastard That aside BuckRodgers according to your NRA all gun owners are responsible and heavily vetted and if they want to kill 10000s of innocents per year, after year, they are allowed to do so as the 2nd guarantees them that fucking god given right I am not quite sure any of you truly understand this LA! Dead 58, injured 500 plus psychologically maimed for live 1000s. That could have easily been 1000 dead. What is your number?

JVoV -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 1:17:24 PM)
Why wouldn't any of the Vegas victims be able to sue the estate of the shooter? That doesn't quite make sense.

WhoreMods -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 1:27:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Why wouldn't any of the Vegas victims be able to sue the estate of the shooter? That doesn't quite make sense. There's fifty nine of them who can't sue anybody, aren't there?

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 1:52:06 PM)
Both of you, above me, confused me posting simultaneously whilst meandering from my point, and the second (WM) by his errant bicycle. Consider this: He was exercising his second amendment right in much the same way Trump would like to kill even the kiddies on Fifth Avenue and not lose one vote. Are you about obamad perhaps you could explain why it was the luck of the gods that only 58 died on this one? From my perspective this could had been dead: 500 1000 2000 And yet not one news outlet mentioned that? Back to you WM why cannot they sue the NRA to fucking bankruptcy, the 58 ghosts, 500 plus injured, and thousands psychologically maimed and president pedo blasé use of the second & threatening to shoot up random strangers on 5th avenue?

JVoV -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 2:08:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Why wouldn't any of the Vegas victims be able to sue the estate of the shooter? That doesn't quite make sense. There's fifty nine of them who can't sue anybody, aren't there? The families can and should.

JVoV -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 2:09:49 PM)
We didn't confuse your posting. We're ignoring you.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 2:56:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV We didn't confuse your posting. We're ignoring you. Reading this, I immediately thought of Gollum/Smeagol talking in the plural. lol

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:00:06 PM)
Perhaps I should lie like the one on twitter called trump and be installed as Lord Almighty of America? We're some of us are not, a blessing indeed for we are sentient individuals and not like you common small depraved folk. Alas you embellish your Lord Trump, and virulent liars of bottom parts carnage. It was good to know that not even 10, 000 dead would have bothered your ignorance, nor your significance, nor anyone who enabled you. I am glad you ignore someone such as me with your boastful diseased sickness *smiles.

BamaD -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:04:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire You are clearly an hysterical leftist, as trump would say when he is not shooting up random people aged 0-110 of fifth avenue who clearly deserve it, for no other reason than for him to prove he is a total mad insane bastard That aside BuckRodgers according to your NRA all gun owners are responsible and heavily vetted and if they want to kill 10000s of innocents per year, after year, they are allowed to do so as the 2nd guarantees them that fucking god given right I am not quite sure any of you truly understand this LA! Dead 58, injured 500 plus psychologically maimed for live 1000s. That could have easily been 1000 dead. What is your number? Not it couldn't have easily been 1000. If so there would have been or are you claim that he just killed less because he was a nice guy.

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:12:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire You are clearly an hysterical leftist, as trump would say when he is not shooting up random people aged 0-110 of fifth avenue who clearly deserve it, for no other reason than for him to prove he is a total mad insane bastard That aside BuckRodgers according to your NRA all gun owners are responsible and heavily vetted and if they want to kill 10000s of innocents per year, after year, they are allowed to do so as the 2nd guarantees them that fucking god given right I am not quite sure any of you truly understand this LA! Dead 58, injured 500 plus psychologically maimed for live 1000s. That could have easily been 1000 dead. What is your number? Not it couldn't have easily been 1000. If so there would have been or are you claim that he just killed less because he was a nice guy. Tell me, indeed us all, where i claimed such a thing liar. Feel free to quote me not that any of you fibbers can. A blessing you lot are shit shots truth be told. He was exercising his 2nd Amendment - ever consider that was is motive?

BamaD -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:25:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire You are clearly an hysterical leftist, as trump would say when he is not shooting up random people aged 0-110 of fifth avenue who clearly deserve it, for no other reason than for him to prove he is a total mad insane bastard That aside BuckRodgers according to your NRA all gun owners are responsible and heavily vetted and if they want to kill 10000s of innocents per year, after year, they are allowed to do so as the 2nd guarantees them that fucking god given right I am not quite sure any of you truly understand this LA! Dead 58, injured 500 plus psychologically maimed for live 1000s. That could have easily been 1000 dead. What is your number? Not it couldn't have easily been 1000. If so there would have been or are you claim that he just killed less because he was a nice guy. Tell me, indeed us all, where i claimed such a thing liar. Feel free to quote me not that any of you fibbers can. A blessing you lot are shit shots truth be told. He was exercising his 2nd Amendment - ever consider that was is motive? You have never said he was a nice guy. You have said that he could have easily killed 1000. Tell me what reason you have for him only killing about 6% of that other than he was just to nice to do it. And only an idiot thinks that committing murder is the same as exercising your 2nd amendment rights.

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:36:58 PM)
Trump is a fucking deranged animal of lies. Have you, or anyone else, ever considered the shooter exercised his second? Any of you at all?

MrRodgers -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:45:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Why wouldn't any of the Vegas victims be able to sue the estate of the shooter? That doesn't quite make sense. thread #3

MrRodgers -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:47:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV Why wouldn't any of the Vegas victims be able to sue the estate of the shooter? That doesn't quite make sense. There's fifty nine of them who can't sue anybody, aren't there? As far as I know...estate can sue estate.

BamaD -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:49:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Drakvampire Trump is a fucking deranged animal of lies. Have you, or anyone else, ever considered the shooter exercised his second? Any of you at all? Again, murder is not exercising your 2nd amendment rights so no rational person would consider that.

Drakvampire -> RE: Vegas lawsuits...there a'com'n. (10/12/2017 3:53:35 PM)
are you putting words into my mouth? Only idiots attempt that. I am asking you an honest question and I would like you above all on here to answer me that. any thoughts on Trump Perhaps he exercised HIS second

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.785156E-02