RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 6:25:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


He ignored the uranium deal, yet investigates a nothingburger

Under Mueller's watch, the Clinton Foundation received 145 million dollars from the Russians while Hillary approved that deal

[image]http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/russian-puppet.jpg[/image]




she didnt sell it, LOL only in your cartoon reality



"Traitor" Bill Clinton also pocketed $500,000.00 for "a speech" to "the enemy"

When Bill Clinton Was Paid $500,000 to Speak in Russia, Hillary Opposed State Dept. Sanctions

Leftist trash called all of this "treason" when they were pretending that President Trump did what Democrats really do




Lucylastic -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 7:42:39 AM)

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-bill-clinton-russia-sanctions-speech/




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 10:27:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
The conversations between Russian diplomats which lead to evidence of collusion are being cooroberated.




No such evidence exists. All of your Russia hysteria is based on lies

The only ones collaborating with "the enemy" were Obama people, there IS evidence of that

Go howl at the moon with your friends


No evidence has been publicly identified yet.

(Which still doesn't address my point that the dossier is proving to be true.)

Note to pops, both the CIA and FBI disagree with you. But, keep your fingers crossed.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214


quote:

It might show the bureau was simply had. Don’t forget that it wasn’t until January the dossier became public, and the media started unearthing details. And the more ugly info that came out (Fusion, Democratic clients, intelligence-for-hire) the more former Obama officials seemed skeptical of it. In May, former Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper said his people could never “corroborate” its “sourcing.” In June, Mr. Comey derided it as “salacious and unverified.”




heavyblinker -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 11:22:45 AM)

I wonder when the 2016 election will end?
Probably never.




jlf1961 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 11:53:58 AM)

And Donald Trump sought information about the Clinton emails:



quote:

A data firm used by the Trump campaign asked Wikileaks' founder Julian Assange in 2016 for access to Hillary Clinton's emails kept on a private server while she was secretary of state, The Daily Beast reported.

The chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, sent an email to several people -- including Rebekah Mercer, a top donor to President Donald Trump's campaign -- explaining how he had contacted Assange seeking access to Clinton's private server. Nix wanted to turn her emails into a searchable database for the Trump campaign or for a pro-Trump political action committee, sources familiar with the situation told CNN.
source

Of course, there is the little detail about the Trump administration dragging its feet on implementing the senate approved sanctions against Russia they passed after Trump took office, which is putting the ball in the senate's court to hand him his ass.

Yup, Trump is the pious pure unstained politician and Clinton was a crooked bitch.

The truth is they are both crooked, unethical and probably deserve to be in prison.




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 11:58:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

I wonder when the 2016 election will end?
Probably never.

I thought you blocked me. Can't keep away I guess. One of your howler buddies was just discussing Ken Starr. So, I guess, anything pertinent and newsworthy is open for discussion. I know, I know, it's not the socialist ideal to let jut anyone discuss anything. But, try and allow it.




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 12:00:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

And Donald Trump sought information about the Clinton emails:



quote:

A data firm used by the Trump campaign asked Wikileaks' founder Julian Assange in 2016 for access to Hillary Clinton's emails kept on a private server while she was secretary of state, The Daily Beast reported.

The chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, sent an email to several people -- including Rebekah Mercer, a top donor to President Donald Trump's campaign -- explaining how he had contacted Assange seeking access to Clinton's private server. Nix wanted to turn her emails into a searchable database for the Trump campaign or for a pro-Trump political action committee, sources familiar with the situation told CNN.
source

Of course, there is the little detail about the Trump administration dragging its feet on implementing the senate approved sanctions against Russia they passed after Trump took office, which is putting the ball in the senate's court to hand him his ass.

Yup, Trump is the pious pure unstained politician and Clinton was a crooked bitch.

The truth is they are both crooked, unethical and probably deserve to be in prison.

Ah, good, these were CNN familiar sources and not it's usual anonymous sources. That's much better.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 12:00:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


This, from Mr. "America deserves to know the truth" himself - [:D]

John McCain Won't Say Whether He Knew He Was Handing Clinton-Funded Russia Dossier to FBI


Who cares who funded it, or who knew?




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 12:08:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
The conversations between Russian diplomats which lead to evidence of collusion are being cooroberated.




No such evidence exists. All of your Russia hysteria is based on lies

The only ones collaborating with "the enemy" were Obama people, there IS evidence of that

Go howl at the moon with your friends


No evidence has been publicly identified yet.

(Which still doesn't address my point that the dossier is proving to be true.)

Note to pops, both the CIA and FBI disagree with you. But, keep your fingers crossed.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214


quote:

It might show the bureau was simply had. Don’t forget that it wasn’t until January the dossier became public, and the media started unearthing details. And the more ugly info that came out (Fusion, Democratic clients, intelligence-for-hire) the more former Obama officials seemed skeptical of it. In May, former Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper said his people could never “corroborate” its “sourcing.” In June, Mr. Comey derided it as “salacious and unverified.”




I am not a WSJ subscriber (and haven't been since Murdoch took it over and it was dumbed down), so I can't read the story in the link.

I have no doubt in May, Clapper was correct. However, Mueller's team has since interviewed Steele.

My prediction:

1. They have already talked to some or all of his sources
2. They are working on corroborating their information with other sources
3. All of this will come out right before Thanksgiving
4. The GOP knows all of this, and this is the KEY reason behind the recent media blitz to discredit the dossier

Great article...

http://news.wgbh.org/2017/10/25/local-news/juliette-kayyem-it-safe-say-thanksgiving-something-going-drop-mueller

We'll see :)





Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 12:22:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


This, from Mr. "America deserves to know the truth" himself - [:D]

John McCain Won't Say Whether He Knew He Was Handing Clinton-Funded Russia Dossier to FBI


Who cares who funded it, or who knew?

Apparently Leon Pantta does.

http://ntknetwork.com/panetta-intelligence-committee-needs-to-look-into-clintondnc-dossier-payment/




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 12:30:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
The conversations between Russian diplomats which lead to evidence of collusion are being cooroberated.




No such evidence exists. All of your Russia hysteria is based on lies

The only ones collaborating with "the enemy" were Obama people, there IS evidence of that

Go howl at the moon with your friends


No evidence has been publicly identified yet.

(Which still doesn't address my point that the dossier is proving to be true.)

Note to pops, both the CIA and FBI disagree with you. But, keep your fingers crossed.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214


quote:

It might show the bureau was simply had. Don’t forget that it wasn’t until January the dossier became public, and the media started unearthing details. And the more ugly info that came out (Fusion, Democratic clients, intelligence-for-hire) the more former Obama officials seemed skeptical of it. In May, former Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper said his people could never “corroborate” its “sourcing.” In June, Mr. Comey derided it as “salacious and unverified.”




I am not a WSJ subscriber (and haven't been since Murdoch took it over and it was dumbed down), so I can't read the story in the link.

I have no doubt in May, Clapper was correct. However, Mueller's team has since interviewed Steele.

My prediction:

1. They have already talked to some or all of his sources
2. They are working on corroborating their information with other sources
3. All of this will come out right before Thanksgiving
4. The GOP knows all of this, and this is the KEY reason behind the recent media blitz to discredit the dossier

Great article...

http://news.wgbh.org/2017/10/25/local-news/juliette-kayyem-it-safe-say-thanksgiving-something-going-drop-mueller

We'll see :)



Yaaa...great article. No facts, just conspiracy supposition. It may very well be correct but I note how far and wide...and obscure...you have to go to reinforce your opinion. Seriously, this woman is noted as a contributor to CNN. Where is CNN's great follow up? As I said, you keep your fingers crossed. Maybe you'll get what you want.




BoscoX -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 1:01:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


This, from Mr. "America deserves to know the truth" himself - [:D]

John McCain Won't Say Whether He Knew He Was Handing Clinton-Funded Russia Dossier to FBI


Who cares who funded it, or who knew?

Apparently Leon Pantta does.

http://ntknetwork.com/panetta-intelligence-committee-needs-to-look-into-clintondnc-dossier-payment/


quote:



Obama CIA Director: Intel Committee Needs To Look Into Clinton Campaign’s Payments For Dossier [VIDEO]

Leon Panetta, a CIA director under President Obama, said Thursday that congressional committees need to investigate who in the Clinton campaign “knew what and when” about payments for the Trump dossier.

In an interview on CNN, Panetta was asked about Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s and DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s denials about knowing who paid for the dossier. It was reported on Tuesday that the campaign and DNC paid for the dossier through their law firm, Perkins Coie.

“Well, it’s obviously something that the intelligence committee is going to have to look at,” Panetta said.


Someone in the Hillary campaign authorized giving Hillary's Russian lovers nine million dollars for a work of fiction... Which is every bit and then some the scandal leftists accused Trump of... Collusion, "treason" and more...

Now even Obama's top cronies are throwing the Clintons under the bus over the very real, massive, growing scandal




sissificationsub -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 1:13:52 PM)

Who instructed them to investigate this and granted the FBI Judas squealer immunity?




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 1:51:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


This, from Mr. "America deserves to know the truth" himself - [:D]

John McCain Won't Say Whether He Knew He Was Handing Clinton-Funded Russia Dossier to FBI


Who cares who funded it, or who knew?

Apparently Leon Pantta does.

http://ntknetwork.com/panetta-intelligence-committee-needs-to-look-into-clintondnc-dossier-payment/


quote:



Obama CIA Director: Intel Committee Needs To Look Into Clinton Campaign’s Payments For Dossier [VIDEO]

Leon Panetta, a CIA director under President Obama, said Thursday that congressional committees need to investigate who in the Clinton campaign “knew what and when” about payments for the Trump dossier.

In an interview on CNN, Panetta was asked about Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s and DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s denials about knowing who paid for the dossier. It was reported on Tuesday that the campaign and DNC paid for the dossier through their law firm, Perkins Coie.

“Well, it’s obviously something that the intelligence committee is going to have to look at,” Panetta said.


Someone in the Hillary campaign authorized giving Hillary's Russian lovers nine million dollars for a work of fiction... Which is every bit and then some the scandal leftists accused Trump of... Collusion, "treason" and more...

Now even Obama's top cronies are throwing the Clintons under the bus over the very real, massive, growing scandal



The 9 million went to Fusion GPS. The firm originally hired by Republicans.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 1:56:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
The conversations between Russian diplomats which lead to evidence of collusion are being cooroberated.




No such evidence exists. All of your Russia hysteria is based on lies

The only ones collaborating with "the enemy" were Obama people, there IS evidence of that

Go howl at the moon with your friends


No evidence has been publicly identified yet.

(Which still doesn't address my point that the dossier is proving to be true.)

Note to pops, both the CIA and FBI disagree with you. But, keep your fingers crossed.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214


quote:

It might show the bureau was simply had. Don’t forget that it wasn’t until January the dossier became public, and the media started unearthing details. And the more ugly info that came out (Fusion, Democratic clients, intelligence-for-hire) the more former Obama officials seemed skeptical of it. In May, former Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper said his people could never “corroborate” its “sourcing.” In June, Mr. Comey derided it as “salacious and unverified.”




I am not a WSJ subscriber (and haven't been since Murdoch took it over and it was dumbed down), so I can't read the story in the link.

I have no doubt in May, Clapper was correct. However, Mueller's team has since interviewed Steele.

My prediction:

1. They have already talked to some or all of his sources
2. They are working on corroborating their information with other sources
3. All of this will come out right before Thanksgiving
4. The GOP knows all of this, and this is the KEY reason behind the recent media blitz to discredit the dossier

Great article...

http://news.wgbh.org/2017/10/25/local-news/juliette-kayyem-it-safe-say-thanksgiving-something-going-drop-mueller

We'll see :)



Yaaa...great article. No facts, just conspiracy supposition. It may very well be correct but I note how far and wide...and obscure...you have to go to reinforce your opinion. Seriously, this woman is noted as a contributor to CNN. Where is CNN's great follow up? As I said, you keep your fingers crossed. Maybe you'll get what you want.



This one is safe, comrades... Fox News!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html

They are circling the wagons...

They are trying to discredit and oust Mueller before he releases anything. That way anything he releases will seem like a distraction on HIS part from their attempted ouster.

It may work. I doubt it. But we'll see. Keep those fingers crossed!




BoscoX -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 2:00:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

The 9 million went to Fusion GPS. The firm originally hired by Republicans.


The Republicans didn't pay for Russians to tell lies about whores pissing on beds like Hillary did. They were interested in real research, information about Trump's real estate deals and casino stuff in Atlantic City - real, legitimate, normal opposition research

Just more desperate BS

If you ever want to know what leftists have been up to, just listen to what they accuse others of doing.All of your Trump / Russia howling is based on lies, and the only real scandal involves your own pussyhat party




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 2:05:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
The conversations between Russian diplomats which lead to evidence of collusion are being cooroberated.




No such evidence exists. All of your Russia hysteria is based on lies

The only ones collaborating with "the enemy" were Obama people, there IS evidence of that

Go howl at the moon with your friends


No evidence has been publicly identified yet.

(Which still doesn't address my point that the dossier is proving to be true.)

Note to pops, both the CIA and FBI disagree with you. But, keep your fingers crossed.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214


quote:

It might show the bureau was simply had. Don’t forget that it wasn’t until January the dossier became public, and the media started unearthing details. And the more ugly info that came out (Fusion, Democratic clients, intelligence-for-hire) the more former Obama officials seemed skeptical of it. In May, former Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper said his people could never “corroborate” its “sourcing.” In June, Mr. Comey derided it as “salacious and unverified.”




I am not a WSJ subscriber (and haven't been since Murdoch took it over and it was dumbed down), so I can't read the story in the link.

I have no doubt in May, Clapper was correct. However, Mueller's team has since interviewed Steele.

My prediction:

1. They have already talked to some or all of his sources
2. They are working on corroborating their information with other sources
3. All of this will come out right before Thanksgiving
4. The GOP knows all of this, and this is the KEY reason behind the recent media blitz to discredit the dossier

Great article...

http://news.wgbh.org/2017/10/25/local-news/juliette-kayyem-it-safe-say-thanksgiving-something-going-drop-mueller

We'll see :)



Yaaa...great article. No facts, just conspiracy supposition. It may very well be correct but I note how far and wide...and obscure...you have to go to reinforce your opinion. Seriously, this woman is noted as a contributor to CNN. Where is CNN's great follow up? As I said, you keep your fingers crossed. Maybe you'll get what you want.



This one is safe, comrades... Fox News!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html

They are circling the wagons...

They are trying to discredit and oust Mueller before he releases anything. That way anything he releases will seem like a distraction on HIS part from their attempted ouster.

It may work. I doubt it. But we'll see. Keep those fingers crossed!

Is that how you read this pops? Seriously, I'm betting if Obama was being...as apparently he should...investigated you'd read it differently.

Oh by the way, maybe one of your obscure lefty publications has finally published a small sidebar about how Obama's IRS finally admitted guilt, paid money...well that's really tax payers and no skin for the IRS... and apologized for targeting conservative groups in an effort to help Obama in 2012.




BoscoX -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 2:09:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

This one is safe, comrades... Fox News!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html

They are circling the wagons...

They are trying to discredit and oust Mueller before he releases anything. That way anything he releases will seem like a distraction on HIS part from their attempted ouster.

It may work. I doubt it. But we'll see. Keep those fingers crossed!


What the article really says (as opposed to what MJ needs to pretend that it says as he suck his little thumb):

quote:

Mueller facing new Republican pressure to resign in Russia probe

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is facing a fresh round of calls from conservative critics for his resignation from the Russia collusion probe, amid revelations that have called into question the FBI’s own actions and potentially Mueller’s independence.

This week’s bombshell that a controversial anti-Trump dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign has Republicans asking to what extent the FBI – which received some of the findings and briefly agreed to pay the same researcher to gather intelligence on Trump and Russia – used the politically connected material.

Hill investigators also are looking into a Russian firm’s uranium deal that was approved by the Obama administration in 2010 despite reports that the FBI – then led by Mueller – had evidence of bribery involving a subsidiary of that firm.


Critics question whether Mueller’s own ties to the bureau as well as fired FBI director James Comey now render him compromised as he investigates allegations of Russian meddling and collusion with Trump officials in the 2016 race.

“The federal code could not be clearer – Mueller is compromised by his apparent conflict of interest in being close with James Comey,” Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., who first called for Mueller to step down over the summer, said in a statement to Fox News on Friday. “The appearance of a conflict is enough to put Mueller in violation of the code. … All of the revelations in recent weeks make the case stronger.”

Outgoing New Jersey GOP Gov. Chris Christie, a former federal prosecutor and Trump ally, also suggested Friday that Mueller consider stepping aside.

“If the facts that you just laid out are true, then somebody with Bob Mueller’s integrity will step aside and should -- if in fact those facts, as you laid them out, are true,” Christie said on “Fox & Friends,” in response to various conflict-of-interest allegations.

The special counsel’s office declined Fox News’ request for comment.

This is not the first time Mueller has faced calls to step down.

Congressional Republicans over the summer raised concerns over Mueller’s relationship with Comey, whom Trump ousted from the FBI in May. Reps. Franks and Andy Biggs, both Republicans from Arizona, had called for Mueller’s resignation for that reason.

President Trump has called Mueller’s relationship with Comey “bothersome,” though hasn’t said much about Mueller’s role lately even as he seizes on the latest revelations about the Fusion GPS dossier to try and turn the tables on Democrats in the Russia scandal.

“It is now commonly agreed, after many months of COSTLY looking, that there was NO collusion between Russia and Trump. Was collusion with HC!” he tweeted Friday.

But the Wall Street Journal editorial board cited the dossier development in calling for Mueller’s resignation on Thursday, saying the “troubling question is whether the FBI played a role” in aiding a “Russian disinformation campaign.”

“Two pertinent questions: Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?” the editorial board wrote, before turning to Mueller's role:

“The Fusion news means the FBI’s role in Russia’s election interference must now be investigated—even as the FBI and Justice insist that Mr. Mueller’s probe prevents them from cooperating with Congressional investigators. Mr. Mueller is a former FBI director, and for years he worked closely with Mr. Comey. It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years. He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.”

Another potential issue is Mueller’s supervision of a bribery probe involving a subsidiary of Russia’s Rosatom, which eventually got approval from the U.S. to buy a Canadian mining company that controlled a swath of American uranium reserves. At the time of the probe, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller as special counsel, was a U.S. attorney and Mueller was FBI director. Republicans want to know how that deal was approved despite the evidence gathered in the bribery probe.

“The whole reason for independent counsels is to have the public trust, the professionalism and the diligence of the investigation, but they have to guard against actual conflicts of interest and apparent conflicts of interest,” said former high-ranking Justice Department official James Trusty, who served under the Bush and Obama administrations. “There may be some tipping point, though, separating facts from rumors, and we may be close to the tipping point.”

Earlier this week, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, called for a separate special counsel to investigate the Uranium One deal.

Grassley, however, stopped short of suggesting he didn’t trust Mueller.

Iowa senator speaks out on 'Fox & Friends' after DOJ lifts gag order on FBI informant.Video
Sen. Chuck Grassley calls for special counsel on Uranium One

“There might be reasons to wonder his involvement because of his involvement with the previous administration during this period of time. There’s no way that I can make any accusations against Mr. Mueller because he is a man of high ethical standards,” Grassley told “Fox & Friends” on Thursday.

Other Republicans have sought to protect Mueller from interference.

There are currently two pieces of legislation in the Senate, with bipartisan sponsorship, that would ensure a judicial check on the executive branch’s ability to remove a special counsel. Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., are behind the bills, along with Democratic senators.

Comey’s attorney, David Kelley, also has disputed the characterizations of the Mueller-Comey relationship interviews in the past.

“Bob and Jim have a congenial relationship as former colleagues. Both served long legal careers that involved overlapping time spent within the Department of Justice, and that’s pretty well documented. But beyond that, they’re not close, personal friends,” Kelley told the Washington Post this summer. “They’re friends in the sense that co-workers are friends. They don’t really have a personal relationship.”

Kelley told Fox News on Friday that he stands by those comments.

Mueller, meanwhile, has been criticized by Republicans for the makeup of his investigative team, which includes several Democratic donors.

“As these various Russian related allegations swirl, I think Mueller increasingly regrets his decision to pick a staff in which half of the prosecutors had either given to, or participated, in Democratic causes,” Trusty said. “That was an unforced error.”





MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 2:14:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

The 9 million went to Fusion GPS. The firm originally hired by Republicans.


The Republicans didn't pay for Russians to tell lies about whores pissing on beds like Hillary did. They were interested in real research, information about Trump's real estate deals and casino stuff in Atlantic City - real, legitimate, normal opposition research

Just more desperate BS

If you ever want to know what leftists have been up to, just listen to what they accuse others of doing.All of your Trump / Russia howling is based on lies, and the only real scandal involves your own pussyhat party


I call bullshit.


Now you are just making shit up. They hired Fusion GPS for Oppo research on Trump. Fusion GPS hired Steele to create this dossier, Steele found out from 2 people who worked at the Ritz Carlton That Trump had whores pissing on beds and included that information in his dossier. There is ZERO evidence that Fusion GPS' original Republican funders only paid for information NOT related to whores pissing on beds.





MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/27/2017 2:17:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

This one is safe, comrades... Fox News!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/27/mueller-facing-new-republican-pressure-to-resign-in-russia-probe.html

They are circling the wagons...

They are trying to discredit and oust Mueller before he releases anything. That way anything he releases will seem like a distraction on HIS part from their attempted ouster.

It may work. I doubt it. But we'll see. Keep those fingers crossed!


What the article really says (as opposed to what MJ needs to pretend that it says as he suck his little thumb):

quote:

Mueller facing new Republican pressure to resign in Russia probe

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is facing a fresh round of calls from conservative critics for his resignation from the Russia collusion probe, amid revelations that have called into question the FBI’s own actions and potentially Mueller’s independence.

This week’s bombshell that a controversial anti-Trump dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign has Republicans asking to what extent the FBI – which received some of the findings and briefly agreed to pay the same researcher to gather intelligence on Trump and Russia – used the politically connected material.

Hill investigators also are looking into a Russian firm’s uranium deal that was approved by the Obama administration in 2010 despite reports that the FBI – then led by Mueller – had evidence of bribery involving a subsidiary of that firm.


Critics question whether Mueller’s own ties to the bureau as well as fired FBI director James Comey now render him compromised as he investigates allegations of Russian meddling and collusion with Trump officials in the 2016 race.

“The federal code could not be clearer – Mueller is compromised by his apparent conflict of interest in being close with James Comey,” Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., who first called for Mueller to step down over the summer, said in a statement to Fox News on Friday. “The appearance of a conflict is enough to put Mueller in violation of the code. … All of the revelations in recent weeks make the case stronger.”

Outgoing New Jersey GOP Gov. Chris Christie, a former federal prosecutor and Trump ally, also suggested Friday that Mueller consider stepping aside.

“If the facts that you just laid out are true, then somebody with Bob Mueller’s integrity will step aside and should -- if in fact those facts, as you laid them out, are true,” Christie said on “Fox & Friends,” in response to various conflict-of-interest allegations.

The special counsel’s office declined Fox News’ request for comment.

This is not the first time Mueller has faced calls to step down.

Congressional Republicans over the summer raised concerns over Mueller’s relationship with Comey, whom Trump ousted from the FBI in May. Reps. Franks and Andy Biggs, both Republicans from Arizona, had called for Mueller’s resignation for that reason.

President Trump has called Mueller’s relationship with Comey “bothersome,” though hasn’t said much about Mueller’s role lately even as he seizes on the latest revelations about the Fusion GPS dossier to try and turn the tables on Democrats in the Russia scandal.

“It is now commonly agreed, after many months of COSTLY looking, that there was NO collusion between Russia and Trump. Was collusion with HC!” he tweeted Friday.

But the Wall Street Journal editorial board cited the dossier development in calling for Mueller’s resignation on Thursday, saying the “troubling question is whether the FBI played a role” in aiding a “Russian disinformation campaign.”

“Two pertinent questions: Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?” the editorial board wrote, before turning to Mueller's role:

“The Fusion news means the FBI’s role in Russia’s election interference must now be investigated—even as the FBI and Justice insist that Mr. Mueller’s probe prevents them from cooperating with Congressional investigators. Mr. Mueller is a former FBI director, and for years he worked closely with Mr. Comey. It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years. He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.”

Another potential issue is Mueller’s supervision of a bribery probe involving a subsidiary of Russia’s Rosatom, which eventually got approval from the U.S. to buy a Canadian mining company that controlled a swath of American uranium reserves. At the time of the probe, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller as special counsel, was a U.S. attorney and Mueller was FBI director. Republicans want to know how that deal was approved despite the evidence gathered in the bribery probe.

“The whole reason for independent counsels is to have the public trust, the professionalism and the diligence of the investigation, but they have to guard against actual conflicts of interest and apparent conflicts of interest,” said former high-ranking Justice Department official James Trusty, who served under the Bush and Obama administrations. “There may be some tipping point, though, separating facts from rumors, and we may be close to the tipping point.”

Earlier this week, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, called for a separate special counsel to investigate the Uranium One deal.

Grassley, however, stopped short of suggesting he didn’t trust Mueller.

Iowa senator speaks out on 'Fox & Friends' after DOJ lifts gag order on FBI informant.Video
Sen. Chuck Grassley calls for special counsel on Uranium One

“There might be reasons to wonder his involvement because of his involvement with the previous administration during this period of time. There’s no way that I can make any accusations against Mr. Mueller because he is a man of high ethical standards,” Grassley told “Fox & Friends” on Thursday.

Other Republicans have sought to protect Mueller from interference.

There are currently two pieces of legislation in the Senate, with bipartisan sponsorship, that would ensure a judicial check on the executive branch’s ability to remove a special counsel. Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., are behind the bills, along with Democratic senators.

Comey’s attorney, David Kelley, also has disputed the characterizations of the Mueller-Comey relationship interviews in the past.

“Bob and Jim have a congenial relationship as former colleagues. Both served long legal careers that involved overlapping time spent within the Department of Justice, and that’s pretty well documented. But beyond that, they’re not close, personal friends,” Kelley told the Washington Post this summer. “They’re friends in the sense that co-workers are friends. They don’t really have a personal relationship.”

Kelley told Fox News on Friday that he stands by those comments.

Mueller, meanwhile, has been criticized by Republicans for the makeup of his investigative team, which includes several Democratic donors.

“As these various Russian related allegations swirl, I think Mueller increasingly regrets his decision to pick a staff in which half of the prosecutors had either given to, or participated, in Democratic causes,” Trusty said. “That was an unforced error.”





I didn't assert the article said or didn't say anything. I was just making an observation of the desperate GOP tactics as they prepare for (what I predict is) the upcoming bombshell release by Mueller.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625