RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 5:22:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Tucker: Source Says Podesta Brothers & Manafort, Not Trump, 'Central Figures' in Russia Probe

https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/58665



Oh this is funny. Monday, they arrest Manafort and pops and all the lefties dance with glee for about a week until they find out he was arrested for his work with the Podesta's and Clinton while she was Sec St.


Mueller leaks "news" about the "top secret" grand jury indictment to his establishment media friends days ahead of time so they can collectively howl about it being a "Trump collusion investigation indictment" for a week - when it's a team Hillary indictment the entire time




Lucylastic -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 5:34:00 AM)

your evidence would be what exactly
Oh thats right
you dont have any




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 6:01:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Tucker: Source Says Podesta Brothers & Manafort, Not Trump, 'Central Figures' in Russia Probe

https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/58665



Oh this is funny. Monday, they arrest Manafort and pops and all the lefties dance with glee for about a week until they find out he was arrested for his work with the Podesta's and Clinton while she was Sec St.



Except, no one knows exactly for what he was arrested. Make sure to tell pops!




Nnanji -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 7:34:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Tucker: Source Says Podesta Brothers & Manafort, Not Trump, 'Central Figures' in Russia Probe

https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/58665



Oh this is funny. Monday, they arrest Manafort and pops and all the lefties dance with glee for about a week until they find out he was arrested for his work with the Podesta's and Clinton while she was Sec St.



Except, no one knows exactly for what he was arrested. Make sure to tell pops!

Pops, you wanted me to tell you the above. Yes no one. Then why are all of your comrades dancing in other threads? Must be to burn off all of their hateful energy, eh pops?




Sir4you59 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 12:49:25 PM)

[image]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBYKJweVYAA1P2c.jpg[/image]




bounty44 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 4:53:51 PM)

dick morris' take:

"Hillary Commissioned The Phony Trump Dossier And Covered It Up"

quote:

Now we know that it was the Hillary Clinton campaign that commissioned the dossier that made the phony allegations of collusion between Trump and Russia.

Think about it: A presidential candidate from one party secretly contracted with a DC smear organization to hire a foreign national — a British ex-intelligent agent — to find dirt on the other presidential candidate. They funneled the payments through a DC law firm, where they thought the details would be buried in confidentiality agreements.

And they were for over a year. Because Hillary and her agents lied about their involvement.

It was only when a subpoena was issued that threatened the release of all of Fusion GPS’s banking records and client names that the truth came out. They had no choice.

That’s vintage Hillary – using campaign funds to hire private eyes to find dirt on her opponent. She did it before to silence the victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. But this time she went over the top. It wasn’t a local private eye; it was a former MI-6 agent who had spied on the Russians and was friendly with both the FBI and MI-6.

Hillary has pretended all along she knew nothing about how the dossier came to exist. In her book What Happened? she disingenuously says that:

“In the summer of 2016…The FBI began investigating a dossier prepared by a well-respected former British spy that contained explosive and salacious allegations about compromising information the Russians had on Trump.

As if she knew nothing about it and hadn’t been the one who arranged for it and paid for it. She acted like she only read about it in the newspaper.

But she knew all about it. And so, did her lawyers and flacks who lied to the press for over a year.

But it was Hillary’s dossier — and it caused all the trouble that she had hoped it would:

The false allegations in the dossier formed the basis of Hillary’s campaign charges that Trump was a “puppet” of Putin,

They provided the justification for the FISA Court to approve surveillance of Carter Page, a Trump associate,

They were at the core of the media coverage of the charge of Trump collusion with Putin

These allegations led directly to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate the issue of Trump collusion with Russia.

Hillary was in the thick of it. But don’t expect an explanation from her. She doesn’t do them.

But we need some explanations.

We need to know whether the Clinton campaign fed any information to the British spook to include in the dossier. He says he got most of his information from “unsolicited” sources.

Was Clinton one of those sources?

And how did they pick this particular former British spy to do the research? Was it because he could count on the cooperation of MI-6 or of the FBI because he had worked in the FIFA (soccer) investigation?

And didn’t Mueller and Comey have to know that the dossier, on which so much was based, was a campaign document amassed at Hillary’s behest? Wouldn’t that suggest a bias? If the FBI couldn’t figure that out, they need to be off the case.

From what “unsolicited sources” did Steele get his information? Did the FBI and MI-6 play a role?

Finally, who gave the dossier to BuzzFeed, prompting its distribution throughout American media and its injection into our political dialogue? Fusion, Steele, and Senator John McCain each deny that they gave the dossier to the publication. Did the FBI or the Hillary campaign do so? We know that Fusion and Steele tried desperately to get the national media to cover the story before the election. When that failed, they worked to get it released even after the election.

Now it’s caught up with them.

Russian meddling in our election has proven to be largely illusory. Placing some ads on YouTube or Facebook is hardly enough to sway a U.S. presidential election. But the fact that one candidate for president laundered money through a law firm to dig up dirt on her opponent from a foreign national with ties to foreign intelligence agencies and then leaking it to the government and the press, making its fictitious allegations the basis for appointment of a special prosecutor is the real scandal here.


http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-commissioned-phony-trump-dossier-covered/




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 5:57:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

dick morris' take:

"Hillary Commissioned The Phony Trump Dossier And Covered It Up"

quote:

Now we know that it was the Hillary Clinton campaign that commissioned the dossier that made the phony allegations of collusion between Trump and Russia.

Think about it: A presidential candidate from one party secretly contracted with a DC smear organization to hire a foreign national — a British ex-intelligent agent — to find dirt on the other presidential candidate. They funneled the payments through a DC law firm, where they thought the details would be buried in confidentiality agreements.

And they were for over a year. Because Hillary and her agents lied about their involvement.

It was only when a subpoena was issued that threatened the release of all of Fusion GPS’s banking records and client names that the truth came out. They had no choice.

That’s vintage Hillary – using campaign funds to hire private eyes to find dirt on her opponent. She did it before to silence the victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. But this time she went over the top. It wasn’t a local private eye; it was a former MI-6 agent who had spied on the Russians and was friendly with both the FBI and MI-6.

Hillary has pretended all along she knew nothing about how the dossier came to exist. In her book What Happened? she disingenuously says that:

“In the summer of 2016…The FBI began investigating a dossier prepared by a well-respected former British spy that contained explosive and salacious allegations about compromising information the Russians had on Trump.

As if she knew nothing about it and hadn’t been the one who arranged for it and paid for it. She acted like she only read about it in the newspaper.

But she knew all about it. And so, did her lawyers and flacks who lied to the press for over a year.

But it was Hillary’s dossier — and it caused all the trouble that she had hoped it would:

The false allegations in the dossier formed the basis of Hillary’s campaign charges that Trump was a “puppet” of Putin,

They provided the justification for the FISA Court to approve surveillance of Carter Page, a Trump associate,

They were at the core of the media coverage of the charge of Trump collusion with Putin

These allegations led directly to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate the issue of Trump collusion with Russia.

Hillary was in the thick of it. But don’t expect an explanation from her. She doesn’t do them.

But we need some explanations.

We need to know whether the Clinton campaign fed any information to the British spook to include in the dossier. He says he got most of his information from “unsolicited” sources.

Was Clinton one of those sources?

And how did they pick this particular former British spy to do the research? Was it because he could count on the cooperation of MI-6 or of the FBI because he had worked in the FIFA (soccer) investigation?

And didn’t Mueller and Comey have to know that the dossier, on which so much was based, was a campaign document amassed at Hillary’s behest? Wouldn’t that suggest a bias? If the FBI couldn’t figure that out, they need to be off the case.

From what “unsolicited sources” did Steele get his information? Did the FBI and MI-6 play a role?

Finally, who gave the dossier to BuzzFeed, prompting its distribution throughout American media and its injection into our political dialogue? Fusion, Steele, and Senator John McCain each deny that they gave the dossier to the publication. Did the FBI or the Hillary campaign do so? We know that Fusion and Steele tried desperately to get the national media to cover the story before the election. When that failed, they worked to get it released even after the election.

Now it’s caught up with them.

Russian meddling in our election has proven to be largely illusory. Placing some ads on YouTube or Facebook is hardly enough to sway a U.S. presidential election. But the fact that one candidate for president laundered money through a law firm to dig up dirt on her opponent from a foreign national with ties to foreign intelligence agencies and then leaking it to the government and the press, making its fictitious allegations the basis for appointment of a special prosecutor is the real scandal here.


http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-commissioned-phony-trump-dossier-covered/



Just when I thought it couldn't get any lower than Matt Schlapp.

Dick Morris.

You beat Bosco for the ultimate kool-aid slurper.




Lucylastic -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 6:05:00 PM)

the dick morris that put his mouth on the line saying romney would win?
Its strange that dick isnt aware of the the repub money man that was involved first.
Not to mention Cambridge Analytica.
This is what happens when partisan hacks throw up opinions, it spatters them forever with the stench




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/28/2017 7:51:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

dick morris' take:

"Hillary Commissioned The Phony Trump Dossier And Covered It Up"

quote:

Now we know that it was the Hillary Clinton campaign that commissioned the dossier that made the phony allegations of collusion between Trump and Russia.


Except that a few of the items, based on intercepted Russian communications have been confirmed (i.e. Mikhail Kalugin being withdrawn, due to fear of his involvement in Russian hacking)
NOTHING in the document has been debunked. NONE of the allegations have been debunked. Calling the allegations "phony" is partisan nonsense.

quote:


Think about it: A presidential candidate from one party secretly contracted with a DC smear organization to hire a foreign national — a British ex-intelligent agent — to find dirt on the other presidential candidate. They funneled the payments through a DC law firm, where they thought the details would be buried in confidentiality agreements.

I have thought about it. Parties hire firms all the time for Oppo research. They use foreign nationals from time to time. So?


quote:


And they were for over a year. Because Hillary and her agents lied about their involvement.

It was only when a subpoena was issued that threatened the release of all of Fusion GPS’s banking records and client names that the truth came out. They had no choice.


True.

quote:


That’s vintage Hillary – using campaign funds to hire private eyes to find dirt on her opponent. She did it before to silence the victims of her husband’s sexual assaults. But this time she went over the top. It wasn’t a local private eye; it was a former MI-6 agent who had spied on the Russians and was friendly with both the FBI and MI-6.


That's vintage everyone. So?

quote:


Hillary has pretended all along she knew nothing about how the dossier came to exist. In her book What Happened? she disingenuously says that:

“In the summer of 2016…The FBI began investigating a dossier prepared by a well-respected former British spy that contained explosive and salacious allegations about compromising information the Russians had on Trump.

As if she knew nothing about it and hadn’t been the one who arranged for it and paid for it. She acted like she only read about it in the newspaper.

But she knew all about it. And so, did her lawyers and flacks who lied to the press for over a year.

But it was Hillary’s dossier — and it caused all the trouble that she had hoped it would:


True

quote:


The false allegations in the dossier formed the basis of Hillary’s campaign charges that Trump was a “puppet” of Putin,

They provided the justification for the FISA Court to approve surveillance of Carter Page, a Trump associate,

They were at the core of the media coverage of the charge of Trump collusion with Putin

These allegations led directly to the appointment of Robert Mueller as special prosecutor to investigate the issue of Trump collusion with Russia.


100% true except for one small detail. The allegations have NEVER been proven false, and will likely be proven true.

quote:


Hillary was in the thick of it. But don’t expect an explanation from her. She doesn’t do them.

But we need some explanations.

We need to know whether the Clinton campaign fed any information to the British spook to include in the dossier. He says he got most of his information from “unsolicited” sources.

Was Clinton one of those sources?

And how did they pick this particular former British spy to do the research? Was it because he could count on the cooperation of MI-6 or of the FBI because he had worked in the FIFA (soccer) investigation?

And didn’t Mueller and Comey have to know that the dossier, on which so much was based, was a campaign document amassed at Hillary’s behest? Wouldn’t that suggest a bias? If the FBI couldn’t figure that out, they need to be off the case.

From what “unsolicited sources” did Steele get his information? Did the FBI and MI-6 play a role?

Finally, who gave the dossier to BuzzFeed, prompting its distribution throughout American media and its injection into our political dialogue? Fusion, Steele, and Senator John McCain each deny that they gave the dossier to the publication. Did the FBI or the Hillary campaign do so? We know that Fusion and Steele tried desperately to get the national media to cover the story before the election. When that failed, they worked to get it released even after the election.

Now it’s caught up with them.


A lot of nonsense saying nothing really.

quote:


Russian meddling in our election has proven to be largely illusory. Placing some ads on YouTube or Facebook is hardly enough to sway a U.S. presidential election. But the fact that one candidate for president laundered money through a law firm to dig up dirt on her opponent from a foreign national with ties to foreign intelligence agencies and then leaking it to the government and the press, making its fictitious allegations the basis for appointment of a special prosecutor is the real scandal here.


This is complete bullshit.
Russian meddling has proven to be very clear and very well documented. We have fake news stories and the ads placed the and the hacking very clearly traced to the IRA and Russian hackers.

"Laundered money?????" More nonsense. A fee was paid to a DC firm for Oppo research. No money laundering.

quote:


http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-commissioned-phony-trump-dossier-covered/





heavyblinker -> RE: Clinton team and Democrats 'bankrolled' Trump dirty dossier (10/29/2017 4:34:05 AM)

Why do you think anyone but the most desperate, deep-in-denial RWNJs would care about this insanity?

So was Hillary also working with Trump's GOP opponents when they hired FusionGPS?
Didn't the WikiLeaks shite confirm that Hillary was pushing for Cruz or Trump to win the primary?

Plans within plans, conspiracies within conspiracies... deep deep shit going on here.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875