Marini -> RE: New Deadly Plague In Madagascar (11/4/2017 5:42:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why anyone would rely on the daily mail for factual information and make it political is pathetic Howler trolls gathered around their CNN / Amazon Post propaganda feeds howling at reality are pathetic from a year ago; interestingly enough in response to the same "criticism" by the same person (are the comrades capable of learning?": "Why is the left obsessed by the Daily Mail?" quote:
...No, our crime is more heinous than that. It is that the Mail constantly dares to stand up to the liberal-left consensus that dominates so many areas of British life and instead represents the views of the ordinary people who are our readers and who don't have a voice in today's political landscape and are too often ignored by today's ruling elite. The metropolitan classes, of course, despise our readers with their dreams (mostly unfulfilled) of a decent education and health service they can trust, their belief in the family, patriotism, self-reliance, and their over-riding suspicion of the state and the People Who Know Best. These people mock our readers' scepticism over the European Union and a human rights court that seems to care more about the criminal than the victim. They scoff at our readers who, while tolerant, fret that the country's schools and hospitals can't cope with mass immigration. In other words, these people sneer at the decent working Britons – I'd argue they are the backbone of this country – they constantly profess to be concerned about. The truth is that there is an unpleasant intellectual snobbery about the Mail in leftish circles, for whom the word 'suburban' is an obscenity. They simply cannot comprehend how a paper that opposes the mindset they hold dear can be so successful and so loved by its millions of readers. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/12/left-daily-mail-paul-dacre quote:
the Daily Mail is a hugely successful newspaper, with a circulation of nearly 2 million at a time when most of the print media is struggling to make a profit. Its website is one of the most read news sites in the world with a staggering 9 million daily browsers last month. The paper is often seen as a barometer for the sentiments of middle England... http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/04/daily-mail-ralph-miliband quote:
...The paper sells an average of 1.5 million copies on weekdays, 2.4 million on Saturdays. Only the Sun sells more but, on Saturdays, the Mail has just moved ahead. Its 4.3 million daily readers include more from the top three social classes (A, B and C1) than the Times, Guardian, Independent and Financial Times combined... Under Dacre, the Mail has won Newspaper of the Year six times in the annual British Press Awards – twice as many prizes as any other paper. Everyone who has ever worked for Dacre, who has just passed his 65th birthday, praises his almost uncanny instinct for the issues and stories that will hold the attention of “Middle England”... “He articulates the dreams, fears and hopes of socially insecure members of the suburban middle class,” says Peter Oborne, the Mail’s former political columnist now at the Daily Telegraph. “It’s a daily performance of genius.” His enemies see the Mail, to quote the Huffington Post writer and NS columnist Mehdi Hasan (who was duly monstered in the Mail’s pages), as “immigrant-bashing, woman-hating, Muslim-smearing, NHS-undermining, gay-baiting”. [in other words, typical liberal response] The loathing is returned, with interest. In Dacre’s mind, the country is run, in effect, by affluent metropolitan liberals who dominate Whitehall, the leadership of the main political parties, the universities, the BBC and most public-sector professions. The Mail, in his view, speaks for ordinary people, working hard and struggling with their bills, conventional in their views, ambitious for their children, loyal to their country, proud of owning their home, determined to stand on their own feet. These people, Dacre believes, are not given a fair hearing in the national media and the Mail alone fights for them. It is incomprehensible to him – a gross category error – that critics should be obsessed by the Mail’s power and influence when the BBC, funded by a compulsory poll tax, dominates the news market. It uses this position, he argues, to push a dogmatically liberal agenda, hidden behind supposed neutrality. Scarcely an issue of the Mail passes without a snipe and sometimes a full barrage in the news pages, leaders or signed opinion columns at BBC “bias”. http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2013/12/man-who-hates-liberal- Not that I owe any fucking body an explanation. I read/or glance at many online newspapers, including CNN, the Washington Post {which I get on weekends} and several others. I LOVE my Daily Mail, which I read daily, but again not exclusively. I will continue to post from the Daily Mail, as long as other folks post from their CLEARLY BIASED sources. PEACE
|
|
|
|