RE: Paradise Papers...a primer.

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Paradise Papers...a primer.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/12/2017 11:16:52 PM

Edwird

Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

"Leftist Media."

Oh!, Stoppp!

< Message edited by Edwird -- 11/12/2017 11:17:37 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)

Profile

Post #: 61

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/13/2017 4:39:42 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Reagan didn't need a wife to suck his dick, the media were waiting in line all year long, every day, every week, every year.

Isn't there a story that Nancy put Frank Sinatra up to blowing him one time to see if he'd notice the difference?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Edwird)

Profile

Post #: 62

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/13/2017 6:39:11 AM

BoscoX

Posts: 11234
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

You have no clue how much politicians spend on their vote buying programs... Trillions. Literally!

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 63

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/13/2017 6:41:10 AM

BoscoX

Posts: 11234
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Reagan didn't need a wife to suck his dick, the media were waiting in line all year long, every day, every week, every year.

Isn't there a story that Nancy put Frank Sinatra up to blowing him one time to see if he'd notice the difference?

Isn't there a forum where you little kids can go to discuss your idiot drivel, so the adults here can engage in grown-up talk without the distraction

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 64

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/13/2017 6:56:17 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Reagan didn't need a wife to suck his dick, the media were waiting in line all year long, every day, every week, every year.

Isn't there a story that Nancy put Frank Sinatra up to blowing him one time to see if he'd notice the difference?

Isn't there a forum where you little kids can go to discuss your idiot drivel, so the adults here can engage in grown-up talk without the distraction

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 65

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/13/2017 9:58:09 PM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

You have no clue how much politicians spend on their vote buying programs... Trillions. Literally!

Obvious by its deliberate omission, is the subtraction from soc. sec. of the income from the payroll tax, the only piece of that pie being paycheck funded like say...$1,224 trillion total proj. for 2018...2015 was a mere Trillion.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BoscoX)

Profile

Post #: 66

RE: Paradise Papers...a primer. - 11/14/2017 9:35:52 AM

MercTech

Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

In the pie chart on budget; why is Social Security included in the chart as it is not funded by the general fund but is a supposedly separately held fund that is not dependent on tax revenue but by FICA contributions?

Or, is the author saying that FICA is really a tax and a boondoggle to force taxpayers into an over 50 percent tax rate without providing the concomitant social benefits like public health care? <yeah, that is snark>

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 67