Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: More allegations of misconduct


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: More allegations of misconduct Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 9:56:26 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

FR and back on topic:


of course you have mohammed and his 13 year old bride, so once again, they were against it before they were for it.

They're always against it until one of them gets caught doing it: it isn't just pedophillia, it works the same way for drugs, turning an airport toilet into a glory hole, adultery, you name it.
All that shit might be on the next checklist nominees have to fill in to prove that they're a true republican...

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 11:20:21 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

There is no evidence to the contrary regarding little mikey the drunken fool.
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4757065/mpage_1/key_Step/tm.htm#4757096
its too bad that he gave it up right away and is the drunken slob you see today. as I said, it was a taste, now you have a sip, and you may have a gulp soon.



Yes, little ronnie. That I'm familiar with and follow the steps is proof positive that you have no reading comprehension, what-so-ever.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

I only skimmed the thread but I think LGH had some issue with the step that said you have to admit you are powerless over x, y z. Well geez you wouldn't be asking for help if you were not somewhat powerless over the issue at fault, right?



I only saw stuff going by, in the scroll, at times but at one point, I saw: "Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature ..." and I thought: "Holy shit! Some poor bastard is doing a fourth step!"

In my experience, that's the toughest one of all and the one that sends most people back out. They tend to focus on the negatives (which is kind of the point) but they get mired in the despair instead of drawing on the hope that they can acquire from others.

Fourth Steps are a bitch and will, frequently, fuck with peoples' heads. It's why they're best done with a sponsor (someone who's done it and is still around).

Admitting that one is powerless over (whatever) is the very first step and you're right. It's an essential. If you don't think you are powerless to (whatever), you're bound to try and prove how you can "beat" it. In the rooms, these people are usually referred to as having "not hit their bottom, yet".

It was explained to me as an elevator that only goes down and each of us can decide where we want to get off the elevator.

I'm not quite sure, though, how step one has anything to do with any kind of religious over-tones. Or, am I missing the point?



Michael


All of your hard "work" and still nothing that backs up this little piece of brain shit from you:

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

you have made many mentions of your drunken stupors here.



Go, you! No, really. Go!




< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 11/13/2017 11:26:12 AM >

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 11:44:11 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline 		oh, you poor drunken slobbering fool. you need to get back to treatment little mikey.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 11:46:01 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
No need for me to "get back", at this point.

I am concerned about you, however. Wet brain is a terrible thing and you're showing some signs, from what I can tell.

Have a day, little ronnie.




_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 11:48:16 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline 		http://www.collarchat.com/m_4658587/mpage_2/key_drink/tm.htm#4662825

you drunken sot. you need to let go of your delerium tremens. have a day free of your incoherent drooling hallucinations, little mikey, hell you'll drink anything.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 11:56:33 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
Yeah, you got me again, little ronnie. I had fourteen buttery nipples, one night.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

You'll have to indulge me because I LOVE to tell this story.

When I was younger, in the 80s, I indulged in all the things that would help get over my performance anxiety. There weren't too many kinds of alcohol that I wouldn't drink to achieve a purpose.

I spent 11 years not touching a drop ('87-'98). When I did decide to try to see if I had matured (I had), I realized that there are very few drinks that I enjoy.

I will drink the aforementioned grand old drink of the South, mixed with Diet Coke (If I'm out) or Diet Wild Cherry Pepsi©.

When I got back to New Jersey ('98), I was a regular at a Friday night karaoke joint. I had been going for about two years when I asked the bartender to put some Southern Comfort© in my Diet Coke. he was shocked. he had never seen me indulge in alcohol.

About a year later, I said: "Paul, I feel like having a drink but I don't know what I want."

He said: "Well, you like that sweet crap." (I don't know where the idea that Southern Comfort© is sweet comes from but that seems to be the consensus).

Anyway, Paul asked me if I'd ever had a Buttery Nipple (which contains one of the other of the few adult beverages I'll drink), I said I hadn't.

After having 14 or so, in one sitting, I can tell you that the stuff is liquid crack. I didn't realize there was any effect until I tried to stand and had no legs.

For those that don't know; one of the old style shot glasses with the white line around the glass is best. You fill the glass to the bottom of that white line with Butterscotch Schnapps. Then, you slowly pour Bailey's Irish Cream© on the top, trying not to mix the two together.

Nectar of the gods, my friends.






I'm still not quite sure how that meets your standards of

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

you have made many mentions of your drunken stupors here.


But, I realize that our realities are very different. Mine is reality (and definitions of words) and your'n has become a twisted prism that (I suspect) has the word "BUDWEISER" on it, somewhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

http://www.collarchat.com/m_4658587/mpage_2/key_drink/tm.htm#4662825


hell you'll drink anything.


Nah. That's you, on your knees, waiting for that "Traveler's Jizz"

Have a day, little ronnie




_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 12:12:00 PM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline 		so, like the communists in the administration, we see that the deflection is there to distract from the fact that the story keeps on changing and getting worse with each post.

You go little mikey, it isn't fair, you being handicapped by your years of drunkenness and nothing much left of your brain, and nothing much to start with, and I only need to point out facts from your own mouth unless you were lying then or are you lying now? I know its a defense you drunken louts use to cover up your shortcomings. But don't be such a transparent shit-faced lush.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 12:58:34 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
as I said, to my memory, wd had only got me wondering, briefly once, when I questioned a particular profile if it was mnottertroll or not. and it was a post that had limited words and from a profile that had only posted a little bit. I don't call that being fooled.

I think it's been more than once. We'll just have to agree to disagree.


I did a search and the only time I point bank asked the question to a user, thinking it was mnottertroll, was to drakk "mnottertroll, is that you?" on nov 6th.

it might be hard to be definitive here because I don't know if some of wd's posts have subsequently been removed but here are my other pertinent usages of "mnottertroll" from the time he was banned through the wd fake profiles fiasco:

the first in reference to "nogutsnoglory"

quote:

never mind fool that herman cain is black, quoted the fbi statistics and you actually didn't post anything that responded specifically to what was said...

curious----WD trying to sound like mnottertroll?

or mnottertroll trying to escape moderation? or maybe even Thompson? ..

http://www.collarchat.com/m_5076342/mpage_9/key_mnottertroll/tm.htm#


this one in reference to playfultom2:

quote:

Michael, im not saying he is, but doesn't this guy sound at least a little like mnottertroll?

http://www.collarchat.com/m_5086967/mpage_1/key_mnottertroll/tm.htm#


and this one concerning seekingmnd:

quote:

what I see so far is another character along the lines of mnottertroll

(and in a separate post after someone else called him mnottertroll) i wont go so far as to say it is him, but I think it sounds like him too.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_5086789/mpage_2/key_mnottertroll/tm.htm#


all of those instances were not "statements saying they were mnottertroll" but remarking on similarities and out loud questioning.

but, maybe I'm making too fine a point on the matter...I have little to no doubt concerning drakk.

if you have any doubt left, take a peek at his interactions above with Michael.

i'll say it again---he cannot be banned (again) soon enough. unfortunately, again, the moderators seem to be inactive.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 1:33:15 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i'll say it again---he cannot be banned (again) soon enough. unfortunately, again, the moderators seem to be inactive.



Yes, the site seems to have deteriorated to a point where much of "policy" has gone by the wayside.

There was a time when creating "socks" to circumvent moderation was a huge "party foul" that carried an extra "punishment" with it.

Unfortunately, even if just the creation of a "sock" weren't a violation, the latest thing I can find on "socks" is at the top of this section and would seem to apply quite a few of the new names we've seen floating around here, lately:

quote:

ORIGINAL HERE

There appears to be a bit of an issue with sock accounts in the Dungeon.

From this point on and until further notice, if you are using multiple accounts to sway opinion, to enforce your stance, to stir up trouble or fool members; you and all your little friends are subject to ban.

If you are allowing someone access to your computer, this will not be an excuse that is accepted. Just say no if anyone associated plans to be disruptive.

You may have multiple accounts, but you may not use multiple accounts to create problems for the forum or members. We don't need any help with that!

Thank you


I would not be honest if I did not say I have a personal conflict with little ronnie. I think it goes back to things like:


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

His son or any other US or European troops wouldn't have been in that situation in the first place if not for W but especially Cheney. But he blames it on the following administration. Same scenario with the financial meltdown.

Understanding, much less facing reality is just not in his daily plans, nor for any of the rest of them. I do think it an immensely shameful and surpassingly dishonorable thing to use a departed loved one for such grossly dishonest political ends.



My son died in Syria in 2012 you ignorant fucking jackanapes; in support of Cunt Clinton's policy to advance the cause of the "Arab Spring".

How the fuck does that fall back to Bush? Never mind. You're too ignorant for me to bother reading an answer. Nice job assuming you knew any facts about my life or the life of my son, though. Douche canoe.

Oh! And go fuck yourself with a backhoe, please.



Michael

What a waste, Too bad you didn't die you miserable fuckstick, sent your son into Ws war. You fucking coward. he died because you are a fucking cowardly cunt.We had no reason to be there, inheirited it as a nation from stupid nutsuckers like you, who stood here beating your little peener when Bush took Cheney and yu fucking pounded your pud like the faggot you are. Treason is a matter of dates. you aint the only person in america lost a son or daughter to your nutsuckerims. Dont wave your tampon here, fucktard



little ronnie has shown himself to be an up-standing member of this community. I've learned to accept that. What's disconcerting (and irks me) is that there are any number of people here, on the "other side" who enjoy any opportunity to "jump on the band wagon" to squeeze my shoes, and call others out for vile behavior, but they stand mute in all the instances where ronnie behaves in the above manner.

To be sure, there have been a few that have brought little ronnie to task, but they are few. The rest seem to be lending assent by their silence, suggesting that these are the "ground rules" they prefer.

That has been duly noted.



Peace,


Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 1:42:09 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i'll say it again---he cannot be banned (again) soon enough. unfortunately, again, the moderators seem to be inactive.



Yes, the site seems to have deteriorated to a point where much of "policy" has gone by the wayside.

There was a time when creating "socks" to circumvent moderation was a huge "party foul" that carried an extra "punishment" with it.

Unfortunately, even if just the creation of a "sock" weren't a violation, the latest thing I can find on "socks" is at the top of this section and would seem to apply quite a few of the new names we've seen floating around here, lately:

quote:

ORIGINAL HERE

There appears to be a bit of an issue with sock accounts in the Dungeon.

From this point on and until further notice, if you are using multiple accounts to sway opinion, to enforce your stance, to stir up trouble or fool members; you and all your little friends are subject to ban.

If you are allowing someone access to your computer, this will not be an excuse that is accepted. Just say no if anyone associated plans to be disruptive.

You may have multiple accounts, but you may not use multiple accounts to create problems for the forum or members. We don't need any help with that!

Thank you


I would not be honest if I did not say I have a personal conflict with little ronnie. I think it goes back to things like:


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

His son or any other US or European troops wouldn't have been in that situation in the first place if not for W but especially Cheney. But he blames it on the following administration. Same scenario with the financial meltdown.

Understanding, much less facing reality is just not in his daily plans, nor for any of the rest of them. I do think it an immensely shameful and surpassingly dishonorable thing to use a departed loved one for such grossly dishonest political ends.



My son died in Syria in 2012 you ignorant fucking jackanapes; in support of Cunt Clinton's policy to advance the cause of the "Arab Spring".

How the fuck does that fall back to Bush? Never mind. You're too ignorant for me to bother reading an answer. Nice job assuming you knew any facts about my life or the life of my son, though. Douche canoe.

Oh! And go fuck yourself with a backhoe, please.



Michael

What a waste, Too bad you didn't die you miserable fuckstick, sent your son into Ws war. You fucking coward. he died because you are a fucking cowardly cunt.We had no reason to be there, inheirited it as a nation from stupid nutsuckers like you, who stood here beating your little peener when Bush took Cheney and yu fucking pounded your pud like the faggot you are. Treason is a matter of dates. you aint the only person in america lost a son or daughter to your nutsuckerims. Dont wave your tampon here, fucktard



little ronnie has shown himself to be an up-standing member of this community. I've learned to accept that. What's disconcerting (and irks me) is that there are any number of people here, on the "other side" who enjoy any opportunity to "jump on the band wagon" to squeeze my shoes, and call others out for vile behavior, but they stand mute in all the instances where ronnie behaves in the above manner.

To be sure, there have been a few that have brought little ronnie to task, but they are few. The rest seem to be lending assent by their silence, suggesting that these are the "ground rules" they prefer.

That has been duly noted.



Peace,


Michael

If you are going to "duly note" such things, do you take into consideration that some people may have him on hide, before you pass judgement on them?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 1:50:59 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

If you are going to "duly note" such things, do you take into consideration that some people may have him on hide, before you pass judgement on them?



as I will duly note that you just quoted his quote (within my quote) and didn't type anything about your opinion on it.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 1:57:56 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline 		Noted.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 2:02:02 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
I'll repeat: "Silence lends assent"




_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 2:29:26 PM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i'll say it again---he cannot be banned (again) soon enough. unfortunately, again, the moderators seem to be inactive.



Yes, the site seems to have deteriorated to a point where much of "policy" has gone by the wayside.

There was a time when creating "socks" to circumvent moderation was a huge "party foul" that carried an extra "punishment" with it.

Unfortunately, even if just the creation of a "sock" weren't a violation, the latest thing I can find on "socks" is at the top of this section and would seem to apply quite a few of the new names we've seen floating around here, lately:

quote:

ORIGINAL HERE

There appears to be a bit of an issue with sock accounts in the Dungeon.

From this point on and until further notice, if you are using multiple accounts to sway opinion, to enforce your stance, to stir up trouble or fool members; you and all your little friends are subject to ban.

If you are allowing someone access to your computer, this will not be an excuse that is accepted. Just say no if anyone associated plans to be disruptive.

You may have multiple accounts, but you may not use multiple accounts to create problems for the forum or members. We don't need any help with that!

Thank you


I would not be honest if I did not say I have a personal conflict with little ronnie. I think it goes back to things like:


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

His son or any other US or European troops wouldn't have been in that situation in the first place if not for W but especially Cheney. But he blames it on the following administration. Same scenario with the financial meltdown.

Understanding, much less facing reality is just not in his daily plans, nor for any of the rest of them. I do think it an immensely shameful and surpassingly dishonorable thing to use a departed loved one for such grossly dishonest political ends.



My son died in Syria in 2012 you ignorant fucking jackanapes; in support of Cunt Clinton's policy to advance the cause of the "Arab Spring".

How the fuck does that fall back to Bush? Never mind. You're too ignorant for me to bother reading an answer. Nice job assuming you knew any facts about my life or the life of my son, though. Douche canoe.

Oh! And go fuck yourself with a backhoe, please.



Michael

What a waste, Too bad you didn't die you miserable fuckstick, sent your son into Ws war. You fucking coward. he died because you are a fucking cowardly cunt.We had no reason to be there, inheirited it as a nation from stupid nutsuckers like you, who stood here beating your little peener when Bush took Cheney and yu fucking pounded your pud like the faggot you are. Treason is a matter of dates. you aint the only person in america lost a son or daughter to your nutsuckerims. Dont wave your tampon here, fucktard



little ronnie has shown himself to be an up-standing member of this community. I've learned to accept that. What's disconcerting (and irks me) is that there are any number of people here, on the "other side" who enjoy any opportunity to "jump on the band wagon" to squeeze my shoes, and call others out for vile behavior, but they stand mute in all the instances where ronnie behaves in the above manner.

To be sure, there have been a few that have brought little ronnie to task, but they are few. The rest seem to be lending assent by their silence, suggesting that these are the "ground rules" they prefer.

That has been duly noted.



Peace,


Michael

little mikey looks like that mnottertail caught you lying again is all.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/world/middleeast/us-military-sent-to-jordan-on-syria-crisis.html

there were no troops killed in syria, your country wasnt there. the first american killed in jordan was in late 2013.

The arab spring occurred in Syria in Jan 2011 and it quickly transformed into the civil war it is today.

No troops were in Syria until 2016.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/07/27/fact-check-clintons-record-state-department-during-middle-east-chaos/87582276/

Clinton was against 'the Arab spring' and did nothing that was likely to increase it.

You need to stop drinking now. Your alcohol riddled brain is the source of your hallucinations little mikey, none of that happened.


We have excellent sanitariums here in the UK, and they are free, perhaps you should avail yourself of them. Sober up enough to get a plane ticket.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 2:34:05 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

little mikey looks like that mnottertail caught you lying again is all.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/10/world/middleeast/us-military-sent-to-jordan-on-syria-crisis.html

there were no troops killed in syria, your country wasnt there. the first american killed in jordan was in late 2013.

The arab spring occurred in Syria in Jan 2011 and it quickly transformed into the civil war it is today.

No troops were in Syria until 2016.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/07/27/fact-check-clintons-record-state-department-during-middle-east-chaos/87582276/

Clinton was against 'the Arab spring' and did nothing that was likely to increase it.

You need to stop drinking now. Your alcohol riddled brain is the source of your hallucinations little mikey, none of that happened.


We have excellent sanitariums here in the UK, and they are free, perhaps you should avail yourself of them. Sober up enough to get a plane ticket.



Poor little ronnie, this was all explained to you eons ago. I guess it's true, even the dimwit dumboears would never have covert ops going during his administration. It was "the most transparent administration in history"

You really are gobbling that Obamajizz, aren't you?




_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 2:50:25 PM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline 		I wasnt here eons ago, and I looked for some explanation from you, and finding none, it would surprise you to know drunken stupor mikey that there was a house that was republican in your country, and ...wait, it is your country right? or are you a muslim in from some muslim terrorist country, saudi arabia or something on a diversity visa? Anyway, if you think of Benghazi, or Emails or any number of things and the crys in those days about where he was sending troops in, always telling congress first, that the hucksters Chaffetz and Gowdy wouldnt have had a hearing or 20? In any case, the death would have been reported by the military, its what they do, you see.

No, no reason for undercover, deep state, hallucination of drunkards covert ops in Syria, you see, there was never an intention of going in there and what would the covert ops do, little mikey? what would be their purpose? why risk sending troops there to do some magic covert something of no use when the country was crawling with CIA and risk widening the war which Obama did not want to do? How many went to gather this covert information? 1-10-100?
that would be a little easy to spot in the light of day or dark of night, marine uniforms running around to get the secret thing. Or perhaps you will have them in native garb, looking for that secret thing. That would be spying and not something in either case would be stood for by a house dead set against him.

No, sorry drunken stupidity on your part. it was never explained, not eons ago or ever except in perhaps some black-out dream you had. or in one of your drunken blog rants.

You remember Niger got a few hours of mention, and that is all republicans up there from top to bottom and they wouldn't want to out one of their own boys would they?

Sorry drunkard, gotta have more than the secret thing.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 3:20:44 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		here are the appropriate sections in the collarchat tos:

(there might be some others on the profile side)

quote:

12. Termination:

12.1. Voluntary: Closing your account voluntarily is accomplished by clicking on "My Account" on the main menu and then clicking on the "Close Account" button.

12.2. Involuntary: Without limiting other remedies, the Website may immediately issue a warning, temporarily suspend, indefinitely suspend, or terminate Your access and use of the Website and refuse to provide Our services to You at any time, with or without advance notice, if:

12.2.1. We believe that You have breached any material term of these Terms and Conditions or the documents it incorporates by reference;

12.2.2. We are unable to verify or authenticate any information You provide to Us;

12.2.3. We believe that Your actions may cause legal liability for You, Our users or Us; or

12.2.4. We decide to cease operations or to otherwise discontinue any services or options provided by the Website or parts thereof.

12.3. Further, You agree that neither the Website nor any third party acting on Our behalf shall be liable to Your for any termination of Your membership or access to the Website.

12.4. You agree that if Your account is terminated by Us, You will not attempt to re-register as a member of the Website without prior written consent from Us.

12.5. Cancellation of Your account or other business relationships with Us shall not be deemed to terminate Our relationship with You with respect to the provision of unsolicited commercial e-mail. This business relationship is specifically deemed to continue indefinitely until explicitly terminated by You, by following the automated procedure specified in section of 12.1 of this document.


creating fake profiles doesn't fit perfectly under 12.4, but it falls under the spirit of it.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 3:26:36 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		these are interesting twists aren't they?

quote:

little mikey looks like that mnottertail caught you lying again is all...

We have excellent sanitariums here in the UK...

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 3:32:21 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

these are interesting twists aren't they?

quote:

little mikey looks like that mnottertail caught you lying again is all...

We have excellent sanitariums here in the UK...




Of course, he let his guard down. Also interesting he knew right where to go (he thinks) to show threads about my (drunken stupor{S})

Search features being what they are, here, you have to have some prior knowledge. The first search term used was "drank"; not "drunk", "drinking", or "drunken".

He knew, generally, what he was after but KNEW he wouldn't find anything (by me) in the past where I'd described a drunken stupor.

I may have to up my game to fourth grade level to best this guy.



Peace,


Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: More allegations of misconduct - 11/13/2017 3:48:05 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		the "arab spring" was a hot button issue for mnottertroll.


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: More allegations of misconduct Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141