WhoreMods
Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 We have all heard the President rant and blast 'fake news' based on anonymous sources and unverified facts. He has criticized every news outlet except FOX news for this, and of course calling it fake news. Unless it is verifiable, it is fake news. If there is not name for the information, its fake news. Unless President Trump does it. This past weekend, our esteemed president retweeted videos of alleged Muslims committing acts of violence against Christians. These videos originated on a British Right wing anti Islam website, and have not been verified by anyone, not the website that originally posted them, nor can the source of the videos be found. When asked about this, along with the previous presidential statements about fake news, Sarah Sanders said: quote:
"Whether it is a real video, the threat is real. That is what the President is talking about, that is what the President is focused on is dealing with those real threats, and those are real no matter how you look at it." When pressed on the difference between the videos being real or fake, Sanders replied, "I'm not talking about the nature of the video. I think you're focusing on the wrong thing. The threat is real, and that's what the President is talking about." source The key part of the statement is ""Whether it is a real video" which clearly indicates that the president and his staff are not required to hold themselves to the same standard as anyone that does not directly support them. Now there is a word for this. Hypocrisy. It also is a direct tactic from the propaganda campaign of Josef Goebbels, one of the master minds behind the attack on a German radio station by the Polish military in 1939. It didnt matter if the attack was real, it just had to look real in the minds of the average German citizen to justify plunging the world into a war. We already know that radicalized Islamic groups are a threat, we dont need justification to respond. What we dont need is a president that uses tactics he criticizes others for to get his message out. It's worth remembering that one of Goebbel's more recent successors, Vladislav Surov (Putin's resident spin doctor and media manipulator) has spent the bulk of his political career spreading fake news about like manure in order to drown out any dissenting and honest reportage in a torrent of shite. But of course, America's president has never even spoken to Putin, so it's unlikely that he's noticed that it's a lot easier to devalue news outlets you disapprove of by associating them with nonsense than it is to legally or illegally silence them...
_____________________________
On the level and looking for a square deal.
|