MasterJaguar01
Posts: 2340
Joined: 12/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV Isn't it the job of the CDC to determine what areas or populations are vulnerable to any given disease? Are the elderly no longer vulnerable to the flu? Can the CDC discuss fetal alcohol syndrome without mentioning the fetus? Is there to be a discussion on "fetal alcohol syndrome" or "vulnerable populations" in a budget report? Did you read the OP, or just scan the headline and scan the words? If you just scanned the headline and words, you missed quite a bit of the story. YES absolutely, there is to be a discussion on "fetal alcohol syndrome" or "vulnerable populations" in a budget report. Particularly if the CDC is working on those issues, and reporting status against their budget on them. (Or is requesting future funding to work on those issues) You may be right, but, it's also possible you're not. I truly don't believe this will be of any real consequence. Having prepared budgets and prepared variance reports in the corporate world for over 15 years, I know what sorts of things are in them. I would say, in this case, there is a far greater chance of Mitch McConnell announcing this week that he is becoming a Democrat and that he secretly is a woman than me being wrong about this.
|