MasterKalif
Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004 Status: offline
|
I strongly disagree, wrong on all accounts....make no mistake Castro is a tyrant. The old dictator run by the mob was far better than this egocentric, genocidal communist who has been in power for 47 years....Batista was in power for less than 15. While both are bad, at least under Batista you could own property, leave the country without government permission, you could criticize more or less the government (unless it was too public), and do whatever you wanted. There was some freedom of speech. Now Cubans can't leave their cities without government permission, they cant travel out of the country without permission, they cant gamble, they cant party, they cant do anything, recently they were allowed to go to Church again....there is no freedom of speech. On top of that Castro and his "little brother" Raul killed thousands of people in the early days, thousands have left the island in desperation, the country is as poor as ever....the only reason they were a little better was when the Soviet Union was giving them about 1 million dollars a day in aid...that way they could keep many social programs running...thus that bought people's complacency, particularly those of the poor. Does this benefit them in the long run? no. Castro's island is hell....Cubans are proud to be Cubans, but to be patriotic you dont have to kiss the boots of your government. nuff said
|