RE: Utopia :)

RE: Utopia :) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Level -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 3:54:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji How many women does it take to change a lightbulb? None. Women should all be dragged into the street, raped, and shot like dogs. I'm just joking. See, Level? Funny! I will agree with Level. While I do not take offense at the OP, it was obviously barely veiled statement of opinion. Granted, a rather ridiculous one, but the fact that it was meant seriously on some level was the only humour I saw in it. I have no issues with that opinion, and there are plenty of feminazis out there who would support it, but I will not support it. Seriously though, my joke was hilarious! Yours, benji Benji, yes, it has to be funny, because you said it was! That's how humor is gauged, isn't it? [sm=hair.gif]

Theslavetrainer -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 3:54:26 PM)
LMAO, hilarious!!! Now those were good jokes.

gooddogbenji -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:03:48 PM)
Actually, Gauge is a pretty funny guy. And yes, saying it's funny makes it so. Which actually explains how many comedians are funny. Yours, benji

LotusSong -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:05:26 PM)
I have discovered the most wonderful feature on here.. that little red hand that blocks those whom's diatribe you do not to wish to read. :) Now back to the gelding issue....

mstrj69 -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:07:01 PM)
The major problem I see with the op is the same thing that is wrong with prostitution. Nobody would legalize it and if they did, those whose sperm were the most desirable would simply sell it on the black market to the highest bidder and keep all the profits. Look at female prostitutes, the best looking do not want to work for someone else and only get half the money when they know they can get it all working on their own. Some might say this is called being a wife, but who cares what you call it.

gooddogbenji -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:07:57 PM)
Ironically, it is threads like these which make this forum worthwhile. Women at their best - pissing and moaning, and men at their best - displaying dominance. Now THAT was a joke. And a damn good one. Yours, benji

LotusSong -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:09:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level Humor. For there to be humor, someone has to say something funny. Didn't find any of that here. Just making assinine and derogatory statements about others and attaching a "I'm just kidding" label to it sure as hell does not make a funny. And yeah, I'd feel the same if someone made a thread about women in the same way. Or blacks. Or people with MS. Now, I'm not saying we can't have jokes about the above.... but again, just taking a dump on someone does not equal funny. And I could care less. It's called "self-confidence". Now, if I may direct you little fingers to the red hand so you no longer have to read anything I write..please feel free to do so.

LadyEllen -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:13:47 PM)
I find it amazing that when a man makes an assertion without any evidence to support it, it is to be taken as factual truth - but if a woman does the same, she's making a statement of opinion. I find it amazing that when a man posts abusive and crass comments about women or ridicules them in some way, its hilariously witty - but should a women do the same in respect of men she's stupid and humourless. And then they say that there really is no reason for us to get so excited about it all, and that we're emotional, illogical (and likely menstrual) to prove the point! E

Theslavetrainer -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:14:57 PM)
Wow, someone really is getting pissy about her thread. Seems this person doesn't like people making jokes about her gender. Hmmm, interesting how big a hypocrite some people are.

mnottertail -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:17:53 PM)
Reply to the OP: I will do it if pretty and voluptuous women of my choosing are giving me dog licking peanutbutter blowjobs anytime I want, or it is pretty much just the same old shit in a different package. Ron

gooddogbenji -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:19:08 PM)
That reminds me - What would happen if the earth moved 30 times faster? We'd get paid twice a day, and women would bleed to death. Yours, benji

LadyEllen -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:21:33 PM)
Hi Benji Here's one for you - "Why dont men want to talk after sex? - Because they just emptied their brains" Seems to be a really good reason to give men sex on demand to me - that way we wouldnt have to hear much out of them LOL! E

Level -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:21:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong quote: ORIGINAL: Level Humor. For there to be humor, someone has to say something funny. Didn't find any of that here. Just making assinine and derogatory statements about others and attaching a "I'm just kidding" label to it sure as hell does not make a funny. And yeah, I'd feel the same if someone made a thread about women in the same way. Or blacks. Or people with MS. Now, I'm not saying we can't have jokes about the above.... but again, just taking a dump on someone does not equal funny. And I could care less. It's called "self-confidence". Now, if I may direct you little fingers to the red hand so you no longer have to read anything I write..please feel free to do so. No, it's not "self confidence" to loathe others, it's weakness. And it's "I could NOT care less", not "could" lol. And why should I block anyone? I'm just having fun.... this is funny isn't it? Aren't we laughing?

LotusSong -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:26:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyEllen I find it amazing that when a man makes an assertion without any evidence to support it, it is to be taken as factual truth - but if a woman does the same, she's making a statement of opinion. I find it amazing that when a man posts abusive and crass comments about women or ridicules them in some way, its hilariously witty - but should a women do the same in respect of men she's stupid and humourless. And then they say that there really is no reason for us to get so excited about it all, and that we're emotional, illogical (and likely menstrual) to prove the point! E Yup.. The ol' "can dish it out but can't take it" syndrome. Gad.. what if all this was actually taking place!!!!

LadyEllen -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:32:33 PM)
Hi Lotus You really should know better by now! - unless youre having fun with them as I am LOL!? Bit unsporting I know, but fish in a barrel are still fish and taste just as good when theyre nicely fried! E

Level -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:35:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji Actually, Gauge is a pretty funny guy. And yes, saying it's funny makes it so. Which actually explains how many comedians are funny. Yours, benji Yes, Gauge has a great sense of humor; get him to tell you the one about the dancing banana when you get the chance [8D].

gooddogbenji -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:36:06 PM)
Serious reply to a serious topic: Deciding the world should be divided up based on gender is about as smart as teaching rocks to swim. It was stupid 200 years ago, it's stupid today, and it will be stupid in 200 years. Both genders have strengths and weaknesses. There are people who are better at math, better at dealing with emotions, better at just about anything in each gender. Saying women wouldn't go to war is just kinda ignoring Queen Isabella, Mirjana Markovic (Slobodan Milosevic's wife, and main force in bringing and keeping him in power) and many others. Hell, even MacBeth's wife was a bitch to be reckoned with. I would argue the reason for a lack of totalitarian regimes run by women is simply because it is hard to push for a female leader in this man dominated world. Therefore, men were often held up high while the women made the decisions. That does not mean I believe women are better, or women should be in the supporting role, it simply means that women can be as machiavellian as men, and would, in general, make no better anything than men, in general. Yours, benji

HayaSierra -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:37:35 PM)
Quick Reply: How would the world differ if women were in charge: We don't know because it has not happened yet. The only thing we have are isolated instances in various old style communities (such as amazons and the like), but we have predominantly lived in a male controlled society and world. So we see what a predominantly male run world and society is like. To see a female run one, we'd have to get there first and people would have to actually give it a chance without making bad judgements before the fact. A nice food of thought for you all, especially those with extreme views that women should only be slaves or are only good barefoot in the kitchen: How would you react if you saw a country that was very successful, peaceful and prosperous that primarely had females in offices of power? Would you hold your views back for a bit and give the Ladies credit for what they managed to do, or would you continue spouting "she should be in the kitchen cooking for her husband type of talk"? Would you move to such a place ONLY if males were predominantly in charge or would you look at the products of the leaders and people involved and come aboard? I am now not talking about a society where men are instantly "slaves" and worthless, but a country where it just tends to be more "Female-led", where males in power positions would be relatively rare. And last question, as unlikely as I think it is, just a food for thought -- what if God was female...? How many males would seriously find themselves having problems down the road and how many would simply go: "Ohh shit!" ..... Now, if God was male I'd have no problems whatsoever, because I don't tend to be narrow in my mind-set and judge individuals by their natures not genders. Probably not the best of posts, but I hope it gets people to think a little. And yes, I agree the OP was funny in a way and I know it was not meant to be serious.

Level -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:38:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji Serious reply to a serious topic: Deciding the world should be divided up based on gender is about as smart as teaching rocks to swim. It was stupid 200 years ago, it's stupid today, and it will be stupid in 200 years. Both genders have strengths and weaknesses. There are people who are better at math, better at dealing with emotions, better at just about anything in each gender. Saying women wouldn't go to war is just kinda ignoring Queen Isabella, Mirjana Markovic (Slobodan Milosevic's wife, and main force in bringing and keeping him in power) and many others. Hell, even MacBeth's wife was a bitch to be reckoned with. I would argue the reason for a lack of totalitarian regimes run by women is simply because it is hard to push for a female leader in this man dominated world. Therefore, men were often held up high while the women made the decisions. That does not mean I believe women are better, or women should be in the supporting role, it simply means that women can be as machiavellian as men, and would, in general, make no better anything than men, in general. Yours, benji Nicely stated my friend.

gooddogbenji -> RE: Utopia :) (8/3/2006 4:40:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Hi Benji Here's one for you - "Why dont men want to talk after sex? - Because they just emptied their brains" Seems to be a really good reason to give men sex on demand to me - that way we wouldnt have to hear much out of them LOL! E Why do doctors slap babies at birth? To knock the penises off of the defective ones. Yours, benji

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.492188E-02