Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping smoking as leading cause of death in the US.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping smoking as leading cause of death in the US. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 4:47:40 PM   
sharainks


Posts: 499
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
As long as the government continues to promote the food pyramid people will gain weight.  They will always do that because the USDA uses it to promote their products.  Mostly meat, dairy and eggs. Outside of grains anything that looks like a vegetable generally does not get price supports. They scratch the farmer's back and the farmer scratches theirs by voting them back in for another round.

The school lunch system bases their meals on the food pyramid and wonders why so many children are obese.  Its not the pop machines outside.  Its the lunches.  My unmentionable suddenly began gaining weight in about 3rd grade  When school was out in the first two weeks she'd lose 10 pounds.  She would get almost to where she started school the previous year, gain 10 pounds right off and steadily the rest of the year. 

Finally we quit with the school lunches.  She lost weight and hasn't gained since.  The government will not do what they need to do to correct this.  It would upset the governmental agencies that profit by the sales of their unhealthy products.  Taxing McDonalds for their fatty food would mean more salads and less meat and cheese. 

I lost 35 pounds last year in 8 weeks by not eating anything that comes from an animal and limiting starches to one a day.


(in reply to MrrPete)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 4:58:04 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline
sharainks: While I agree with your observations, I would have to say that it is my opinion that if people stuck to the "food pyramid" but cut out anything that was processed, eating food that looks the way it does in nature, so to speak, they would not suffer weight gain. Oh, and it would help if phys ed wasnt cut for the sake of cramming for the standardized tests.

School lunches (and most American's diets) don't work because they are primarily composed of low-quality, fatty meats, highly processed starches, a lot of sugar and very few fresh vegetables.

As far as carbonated beverages are concerned, I do not believe that unmentionables should be consuming caffeine in any form, and the sodium content alone is reason enough to leave it alone.


_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to sharainks)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:03:56 PM   
sharainks


Posts: 499
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
I agree justheather but the problem is, nothing is like it used to be in nature.  I went on a hardcore vegan kick a year ago and did a lot of exploration of just what is fed to our cattle, how they are kept, how our birds are kept.  I found out just what is in milk and the number of health problems associated with dairy products.  Dairy is implicated in everything from type 1 diabetes to breast cancer, prostate cancer etc. 

These animals are unhealthy because of how they are kept and what they are fed.  We then think that after eating a sickly animal, its eggs, or drinking its milk we should be healthy? What other mammal drinks the milk of another?  What other mammal drinks milk clear into adulthood? 

Oh..and as long as the "new" food pyramid contains more fruits and veggies why are they out of range of what lower income families can afford?  As long as an apple is almost a dollar and those bricks of noodle soups are a quarter what will the poor kids get fed?

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:18:05 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Well, if you do the math there's a lot more fat people  than smokers so it would just go to figure that obesity is the number one killer.

(in reply to sharainks)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:28:17 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline
You are preaching to the choir, here.

No other mammal drinks milk past infancy. There is no physiological reason for an adult to eat/drink dairy. I weaned my unmentionable from the breast to soy milk. He now enjoys both. I know Im not 'supposed to' drink milk, but I love dairy. Ive gone through a few cycles in and out of vegetarianism, but I have never chosen to cut dairy. I buy hormone-free, organic dairy. We are currently lucky enough to raise our own chickens without antibiotics. I get my seasonal veggies from a farm for most of three seasons out of the year... But Im lucky to be able to do these things.

It's very hard (and expensive) to eat healthily in our culture. I used to know an ADULT woman who thought that macaroni and cheese was a vegetable because it was a "side" at Roy Rogers. The poorer class are not educated about nutrition in a way that is meaningful to them, and you are right, when it comes down to it they can't afford to eat really really healthy (organic, minimally processed foods) anyway.

It isnt just poor people who eat unhealthily. Lots of people who have choices still make the wrong ones because of our cultural values. Our culture makes it nearly impossible for the small farmer to survive. People would rather go to Walmart and spend thirty cents on an apple that was grown by a corporation, has been sitting in a warehouse and covered in wax and full of pesticides than pay seventy five cents for a fresh, organic one because they want money for cigarettes and gasoline and cable TV and Tommy Hilfiger clothing and forty pairs of shoes and an X box all the things our culture values instead of wellness.

And Im not any better than anybody else, I just happen to be aware. Maybe that makes me worse.

Still, I think any little move a person makes toward "back to the way it looks in nature" is a good one. Id still rather a young person eat peanut butter and wheat bread and milk and an apple that came from not-the-best-food-sources than a McDonalds Happy Meal and some carbonated garbage.

The problem lies a lot deeper than simply what people choose to put into their mouths, it lies in our culture and its beliefs about what is important.


_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to sharainks)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:33:08 PM   
twicehappy


Posts: 2706
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
Reading both this thread and the second hand smoke thread i've come across numerous references to the fact that second hand smoke causes disease and death. Ok fine, can anyone provide me with statics on this from a reliable source like the CDC or NIH?

_____________________________

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.

The human heart is not a finite container but an ever expanding universe with all the stars contained there in.

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:33:27 PM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sharainks

As long as the government continues to promote the food pyramid people will gain weight.  They will always do that because the USDA uses it to promote their products.  Mostly meat, dairy and eggs. Outside of grains anything that looks like a vegetable generally does not get price supports. They scratch the farmer's back and the farmer scratches theirs by voting them back in for another round.

The school lunch system bases their meals on the food pyramid and wonders why so many children are obese.  Its not the pop machines outside.  Its the lunches.  My unmentionable suddenly began gaining weight in about 3rd grade  When school was out in the first two weeks she'd lose 10 pounds.  She would get almost to where she started school the previous year, gain 10 pounds right off and steadily the rest of the year. 

Finally we quit with the school lunches.  She lost weight and hasn't gained since.  The government will not do what they need to do to correct this.  It would upset the governmental agencies that profit by the sales of their unhealthy products.  Taxing McDonalds for their fatty food would mean more salads and less meat and cheese. 

I lost 35 pounds last year in 8 weeks by not eating anything that comes from an animal and limiting starches to one a day.

Interesting! Actually you accidentally discovered the problem with regard to the short people. It isn't what the gov't does or doesn't do that affects child obesity, actually the less government intervention in anything the less it will be screwed up. If you see a fat child...two things will likely be visible, a fat parent and a child who is not guided properly. If the parent isn't fat (it happens), the problem is still the parent. Parents with fat children should in all actuality be considered child abusers. If a parent is relying on the govenment to do their job for them, I am afraid you are in for a long wait...well maybe not that long with people pushing for regulating everything.
As for the pyramid thing, that's an excuse, nothing more. I don't watch what I eat, I eat red meat, fruit sometimes, a candy bar if I want it, pie or cake when the mood strikes me, whole milk, beer, butter, sugar, red wine, eggs, bacon, hotdogs, whatever....get the idea. You can actually eat whatever you want and it doesn't have to have a weight watchers label on it to be healthy....but you DO have to get up off your ass on occasion to do something other than just go the the kitchen to get another snack.
 
For those who are so damned offended at smokers in restaurants...what about us folks who are trying to enjoy our meal when the fat family comes in with their porky kids running amuck and they attack the buffet. I have actually considered walking up to one of these double spare tire types at a buffet before and telling them...they really don't need that. But of course, that would be offensive...like waddling isn't?

_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to sharainks)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:38:28 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Heather, lol @ "Tommy Hilfinger and 40 pairs of shoes".
Yes, you are correct in all the above.
Too many Corporations making too much money in the food business to change it.
That's why I try to increase my activity level and burn more calories on the treadmill at the gym and walking and biking.
I'm a disabled veteran and I can ride or walk circles around the fatties.

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:46:00 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline
Popeye, I agree that the (unfortunate) truth (for people like me who just don't like to exercise) is that you have to move your body to keep it healthy.

_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:53:47 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
"Food" for thought:




One high-saturated fat meal can be bad



By JOE MILICIA, Associated Press Writer2 hours, 30 minutes ago

Eating just one meal high in saturated fat — in this case, carrot cake and a milkshake — can quickly prevent "good" cholesterol from protecting the body against clogged arteries, a small study shows.

Yahoo news link

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 6:57:12 PM   
sharainks


Posts: 499
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
justheather you hit on another point.  Our whole culture promotes eating as a social event.  Thanksgiving, Christmas, candy at Halloween.  Dining out on dates, getting together with the family to break bread together.  Thats one thing that's consistently driven me nuts.  Opt out of a family eat fest and find yourself the outcast of the family.  Bring a salad and insult your hostess.  Shouldn't it matter more that you are together than it does that you eat while you're together?

More than that...why is it that when someone who needs to lose weight goes to an event, salad in hand, they are urged to "Just try a bit, it won't hurt this once."  That's (to my mind) like urging an alcoholic to drink "just this once."  Why is turning down food one doesn't need an insult to anyone?



(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 7:14:06 PM   
LadyJulieAnn


Posts: 979
Joined: 6/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

Intriguing idea twice, but I agree with stef (relax stef, it probably won't happen again), smoking and obesity may well be equally dangerous, but smoking has the proven ability to harm those who do not smoke, which overeating doesn't really.
I am a smoker, and I don't really think I have a right to smoke where it will affect others...I wish I did, but I don't.


Yeah why is it that every thime I get side swiped on a highway it is some jack ass who can barley fit in a car and was stuffing fries in his mouth while holding the burger with the other and drifting from lane to lane. I dont bother to move out of the way if people are stupid enough to do that.


Are you sure you weren't sideswiped by someone who was trying to find their favorite cd, talking on a cell phone, and turning around to yell at the kids in the backseat?

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 7:27:11 PM   
LadyJulieAnn


Posts: 979
Joined: 6/29/2005
Status: offline
I don't know about you, but I'm a bit more concerned about the children that are left strapped in their car seats in 100 degree heat as their parents go into Wal-Mart for an hour.  I also tend to find the cases where the parent refuses or forgets to feed their child as slightly more important.

Be well,
Julie

(in reply to twicehappy)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 7:27:39 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Heather, ever try walking?
You can drive to a nice park or beach or walk in your neighborhood.

(in reply to justheather)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 8:02:26 PM   
justheather


Posts: 1532
Joined: 10/4/2005
Status: offline
Popeye, I used to live in the city and my dog and I took long walks every day. Now I live in a place where there are no sidewalks and lots of windy hills and fast-moving cars. ..My unmentionable and I go hiking but not often enough. My boyfriend and I do take walks, but not as regularly as either of us would like.
I used to dance in college - ballet and modern dance. That is the only form of exercise that Ive really ever enjoyed. It was no coincidence that I was the smallest size Ive ever been then.
That was also a period of time in my life when I made it a point to not have all my social interactions revolve around food, like sharainks was talking about. (Excellent point, sharainks)
Ya know, I think my dog would be really happy if I took up walking him again.
Thanks for the suggestion.


_____________________________

I want the scissors to be sharp
And the table perfectly level
When you cut me out of my life
And paste me in that book you always carry.
-Billy Collins

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 8:08:39 PM   
cynthiamarie


Posts: 205
Joined: 3/11/2005
From: Bluefield, WV, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Parents with fat children should in all actuality be considered child abusers.

 
Ok, let's have all children carefully weighed, and if they're not EXACTLY the weight that the government says they should be (skinny included), let's toss all their parents behind bars to solve the problem. 
 
Everyone in my family is overweight, and...guess what?  We exercize and our calorie intake is usually around 2000 calories per day...and...we're not overeating, except maybe on Christmas and Thanksgiving. 
 
Low carb diets are the only thing that works for us, but the affordable foods happen to be mostly all those "healthy" grains. 
 
We don't smoke, drink, have never had cable tv (and in this area, that means no tv over than VHS tapes or DVDs), no top label clothing, and my son has 4 pairs of shoes...one are thongs, another steel toed boots for mowing the lawn in, tennis shoes, and church shoes.  We have no cell phones either.  He got a Game Cube for Christmas, and it was his only gift from me because gas prises took half of our income.  As for gasoline, there's no money for bowling or going to the movies so we're not driving all around wasting good food money on gas. 
 
Many of us would buy only organic if we could, and the "reason" why we're not doing so is the price and availability.  I wish Alta Dena were here in WV so I could drink fresh, raw milk...someone would have to hold a gun to my head to make me drink soy milk.  Oh, and what about that study that said some people were getting cancer from consuming too much soy?  I don't know where the article is, has anyone else run into it?
 
Most of our beef burgers at schools and fast food places are mostly "hydrolized vegetable protein", aka soy.
 
For some body types, going vegetarian is the answer...but for some, we need more low carb veggies and less fruits (all the vitamins found in fruits are also found in veggies, to technically, we don't really NEED fruits with all their sugars to get our vitamins), and more meats and proteins. 
 
To each his own. 

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 8:27:55 PM   
MistressLorelei


Posts: 997
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash

[Interesting! Actually you accidentally discovered the problem with regard to the short people. It isn't what the gov't does or doesn't do that affects child obesity, actually the less government intervention in anything the less it will be screwed up. If you see a fat child...two things will likely be visible, a fat parent and a child who is not guided properly. If the parent isn't fat (it happens), the problem is still the parent. Parents with fat children should in all actuality be considered child abusers. If a parent is relying on the govenment to do their job for them, I am afraid you are in for a long wait...well maybe not that long with people pushing for regulating everything.
As for the pyramid thing, that's an excuse, nothing more. I don't watch what I eat, I eat red meat, fruit sometimes, a candy bar if I want it, pie or cake when the mood strikes me, whole milk, beer, butter, sugar, red wine, eggs, bacon, hotdogs, whatever....get the idea. You can actually eat whatever you want and it doesn't have to have a weight watchers label on it to be healthy....but you DO have to get up off your ass on occasion to do something other than just go the the kitchen to get another snack.
 
For those who are so damned offended at smokers in restaurants...what about us folks who are trying to enjoy our meal when the fat family comes in with their porky kids running amuck and they attack the buffet. I have actually considered walking up to one of these double spare tire types at a buffet before and telling them...they really don't need that. But of course, that would be offensive...like waddling isn't?


If you were starving and a fat person consumed the entire buffet while you were forced to starve, you'd have a case.  Your being bothered by a fat family whose buffet habits you disapprove of  is not a health risk to you.

Some of the smokers in these threads have commented how the non-smokers just don't like smoke and are making a big deal...(well, it wouldn't bother us  much if your smoke wasn't a health risk to us), but seem to have no problem in sharing over and over again their dislike and belittling of those who are overweight.

I have not seen the non-smokers say they dislike smokers as people, or go to town on any less than attractive physical traits shared by a whole lot of smokers (poor skin, excess wrinkles in the aged, yellow teeth, bad breath, etc).   If a person wants to be large, or have yellow teeth, or bad breath or waddle...  who cares.... it doesn't harm anyone else, like second hand smoke does.


(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/7/2006 8:36:24 PM   
TheOriginalBitch


Posts: 35
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: twicehappy

What will they do when the good old government legislates away their right to go to Baskin Robbins or unwrap a Twinkie in public?

They can do that right after they prove the detrimental health effects from second-hand calories

~stef


Laugh's My Ass Off.....Good One stef

Mistress
The Original Bitch

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/8/2006 2:26:36 AM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei


If you were starving and a fat person consumed the entire buffet while you were forced to starve, you'd have a case.  Your being bothered by a fat family whose buffet habits you disapprove of  is not a health risk to you.

Some of the smokers in these threads have commented how the non-smokers just don't like smoke and are making a big deal...(well, it wouldn't bother us  much if your smoke wasn't a health risk to us), but seem to have no problem in sharing over and over again their dislike and belittling of those who are overweight.

I have not seen the non-smokers say they dislike smokers as people, or go to town on any less than attractive physical traits shared by a whole lot of smokers (poor skin, excess wrinkles in the aged, yellow teeth, bad breath, etc).   If a person wants to be large, or have yellow teeth, or bad breath or waddle...  who cares.... it doesn't harm anyone else, like second hand smoke does.


Kind of sucks when the shoe is on the other foot...doesn't it? Same logic (and attitude), different topic, just sounds like we swapped pro/con sides. As for the second hand health risk..who are you to say? Maybe the affected folk's blood pressure rises when the "F" family waddles in, likely not a healthy outcome and makes just as much sense. 

_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping... - 8/8/2006 2:50:37 AM   
fullofgrace


Posts: 395
Joined: 3/24/2006
From: fl, usa
Status: offline
the difference between physical complications resulting from weight and physical complications resulting from smoking are huge. first of all, not all people who are overweight are so because of the way they eat, and not all people who are overweight are capable of losing weight. second of all, some people who are overweight had physical problems beforehand (i had osteoarthritis years before i slipped into the overweight range). physical complications from smoking are far more clear-cut; it's a definite that smoking damages your health and it's a definite that quitting smoking is benefitial to your health, and quitting smoking is a fairly clear-cut process. however, losing weight is not. it's like asking a chainsmoker to be a social smoker, in some cases. food is not like smoking; you can't just quit cold-turkey.

these are reasons why i don't think it's fair to compare obesity and smoking in this way.


_____________________________

i have the kind of beauty that moves...

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Government to ban over eating, obesity outstripping smoking as leading cause of death in the US. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.079