RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 5:22:23 AM

WhipTheHip

Posts: 1004
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline

Boxing is not okay. Bdsm is okay. Just most people don't
understand it. Our society is much more friendly to violence
than to sex. Look at television. You can thank Christianity
for this.

(in reply to onestandingstill)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:25:08 AM

KnightofMists

Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhipTheHip

Boxing is not okay. Bdsm is okay. Just most people don't
understand it. Our society is much more friendly to violence
than to sex. Look at television. You can thank Christianity
for this.

wake up and smell the coffee.... BDSM doesn't equate to sex. In fact .... the SM component is very much equated to violence.

However, many incorporate Sex and their Sexuality with BDSM.... they are distinct but coexist nicely.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to WhipTheHip)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:36:16 AM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

wake up and smell the coffee.... BDSM doesn't equate to sex. In fact .... the SM component is very much equated to violence.

You should consider switching to decaf. To the majority of the vanilla population, BDSM is just kinky sex. The reality of the situation doesn't figure into their perceptions at all.

~stef

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to KnightofMists)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:44:55 AM

LaTigresse

Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

Not THIS part of the majority!

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to stef)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:56:10 AM

twicehappy

Posts: 2706
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Not THIS part of the majority!

Not our parts either!

Good morning beautiful.

_____________________________

Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations.

The human heart is not a finite container but an ever expanding universe with all the stars contained there in.

(in reply to LaTigresse)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 7:02:59 AM

KnightofMists

Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

The reality of the situation doesn't figure into their perceptions at all.

~stef

Ignorance is bliss... but in this day of knowledge... it is becoming harder and harder to stay ignorant. What outsiders percieved today is different than yesterday and will be different tomorrow.

Hell... it was too long in the past that oral sex was considered a taboo of sexual interactions.. now it a part of mainstream's perception of sex. Just as society's perception of sex has changed and will continue to change... so will their perceptions of BDSM.

< Message edited by KnightofMists -- 8/16/2006 7:03:48 AM >

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to stef)

Profile

Post #: 46

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:00:20 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Not THIS part of the majority!

Do you honestly consider yourself a part of the vanilla population?

~stef

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to LaTigresse)

Profile

Post #: 47

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:06:40 PM

marieToo

Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: onestandingstill

Why do you feel society frowns so severely on S&M contact & can accept the other intense activities?
Suzanne

I dont think they do. Furthermore, most bdsmers, in my view, are naive when they think that 'vanilla' people havent a clue, or condemn S and M. Id be willing to bet that most "vanillas" have experienced it at some point in their sex lives, or at least fantasize about it, or have done some 'lighter' play without even realizing its "S and M". We're not special and we didnt invent the "spankin".

(in reply to onestandingstill)

Profile

Post #: 48

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? - 8/16/2006 6:30:16 PM

WhipTheHip

Posts: 1004
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline

People fear that which they don't understand and people who are different than them. Vanillia people
look us, the same way some of us look at consensual-nonconsensuality or Dolcett. They think
anyone into bdsm must be sick, perverted, mentally ill, and dangerous. People have all kinds of
fears. They think we tie up young women against their will and beat them with chains, the
way they did in the Middle ages to extract confessions. That is why I believe a R-rated
documentry would be good to show how light bddsm look. Moreover, they can't
understand what anyone would get out of letting another person whip them.

(in reply to michaelGA2)

Profile

Post #: 49