|
juliaoceania -> RE: All Points Bulletin - Be on the lookout for... (8/8/2006 2:10:08 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Emperor1956
quote:
Juliaoceania said: You think it is ok to broadcast the sub's name, whom I have read on this forum, and humiliate her when she did NOTHING WRONG but have an over protective dom? Perhaps I am taking leave of my senses, but I highly doubt anyone would want their submissive humiliated because they emailed someone. He didn't broadcast the nic of the dom, but the nic of the sub, and it was scrubbed. His fake concern for her overwhelm me.
Julia: When I read the post, the sub's name was not there. And I think I made it clear in my first post that I believe that private things should stay private, so, no I do not approve. But that isn't the issue. You said from the start you objected to what the OP wrote in his journal. My point to you is that you do not control his journal and carping about what he wrote makes no sense.
And while I don't approve of the posting of private information in public, if you are upset over the OP's "outing" of the submissive, don't you think the submissive's Dominant was also in error when he emailed the OP with his "warning"? The Dom "opened the door" (as we say in the courtroom) by publishing an email that linked him to his sub. Personally, I don't see why people keep their relationships secret if they have nothing to hide. But if this relationship was intended to be a secret, then the Dom surely should not have sent that email warning the OP off of his property. Indeed, several people on CollarMe maintain relatively clandestine real life relationships with others, and these people go absolutely ballistic when thru inadvertence or no malice, the relationship is revealed.
How does it go? "Two may keep a secret, if one of them is dead."?
E.
He posted his journal as a part of the OP and I responded to the entire opening post, not just the part about the dom that emailed him. He judges all doms that do not want him to talk about the lifestyle with other dominants. This is a personal preference of the dominant and is of no concern of this guy. I found every part of his post objectionable because I saw the original before it was scrubbed with the name of the sub.
If he had mentioned generalities instead of a specific instance and not cut and pasted the emails with the sub's name I wouldn't care at all that people thought this dom's behavior was out of line. The OP was out of line in my opinion for broadcasting the name of someone that took no part in this little tirade and pissing contest on either side of it. The fact that she is owned by a dom does not give someone license to use her as a way to beat her dom over the head on a forum and call him out... worse than tacky in my eyes.
The latter part of his post, which included his journal entry that he posted within his OP shows another part of his character in trying to tell other owners how they should treat their property. Somehow I do not think anyone should care what he thinks about this. I certainly don't, and if my Daddy told me not to answer any email from a dominant that posts here I wouldn't... He hasn't instructed me not to do so, but if he did I would obey and I would find the suggestion that he was insecure because of his order to be highly offensive to my dynamic with him... it really is no one's business.
I have to wonder what the motivation for this thread was, because it appears to be vindictive at the very least. He shows a pattern within his journal of not respecting the authority of other dominants over their property. I do not ridicule people from the other side, as I said earlier. I certainly wouldn't start a thread to ridicule someone that I had inadvertently offended, I would regret the offense. I certainly wouldn't broadcast the name of a wholly and completely innocent party in a forum she enjoys to post in.
|
|
|
|
