|
Jasmyn -> RE: Research: Why men pay, while women free? (1/1/2005 9:17:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: REDsoon
I am trying to make a research and see why men usually pay money/tribute to be a submissive while women can receive services free.
Many women visit pro doms and readily pay for the privilege of doing so.
Secondly I think many people could be insulted by the notion that a male dom is merely 'providing a service' to non-paying females.
Why men pay? The same reason women do. They want a session of submission.
quote:
It's interesting because for me when a man pays for services to be slave he is actually paying for a woman to conduct services and instruct/command her what to do on him and hence that man is behaving like a master in effect. He is in control by paying money. So how could that money slave who is commanding her like a master be a slave/submissive?
Some Mistresses will script session where they do exactly as the paying client requires. But how does this differ from the fem sub arranging a session of spanking with a trusted Master or Mistress or disciplinarian? *rolls eyes* Not all pro doms script session and a lot take great care in developing long term relationships with session slaves that have fark all to do with money but everything to do with servitude.
Secondly he is far from 'masterful' crawling across the floor to the toilet bowl before licking it clean because it amuses the Mistress. Lastly the logic is flawed because it is based on the assumption the pro dom is not somehow attracted to the task before her and can't veto her way out of it if it isn't.
quote:
I just want to know if the answer is more than one of the following points:
1) Men are not attractive physically. They are just attractive financially so the term “financial slaves” comes.
No the term financial slave did not arise from pro domination or men been ugly. Financial domination is a very real kink and often found in the area of Fem Supremacy where the slave desires that Mistress control their finances. For men in particular, financial means, defines independence...having the Mistress remove their financial means is the ultimate in 'dependence' upon their Goddess. Financial slavery is not limited to male subs only, female subs have been known to seek the same.
'Financial slaves' in the manner I think you mean is largely a cyberage invention and has little to do with domination and slavery and all to do with taking advantage of guillable men who may or may not have a very real desire to have their wallets raped. Again a 'dependance' thing. I've also wondered if it is because some men have no reason to strive in their careers, they may or may not have a demanding wife, they need a 'purpose' in life and some find that purpose is in having a demanding spoilt women saying gimmie gimmie gimmie work harder worm I want more.
quote:
2) Men are more violent than women so women need money to compensate taking the risk for services. Women join for free on most web sites. Most Mistress’s prefer female slave/submissive in many cases.
Where does someone get the notion most Mistresses' prefer female slaves? I think in the pro dom arena it is the WOMEN who are more likely to be violent than the male.
Women get free membership to shit simply because its good economics...the majority of men will go where the majority of women hang out..its a numbers game. Ever wondered why most successful bar owners have attractive staff? A good looking barman will attract more women to a bar giving men (the biggest spenders) to their bar a reason to drink there.
quote:
3) Men are more in number who are active socially (like at night on the streets) so their abundance make them less desirable. Keeping a 50/50 ratio is good for business so women join for free.
See above.
quote:
4) Men could not control themselves due to testosterones so what they ask is in a quick rush. They may change their minds about being slaves/submissives anytime so money has to be taken to compensate for the loss of obtaining their services from them as.
Money is taking simply because they are paying for a service. The service been 'a session with a Mistress' that they may or may not get elsewhere. Paying for it has little to do with compensation or fickle subs who yo-yo within their desire to submit, or plain and simple horny geeks looking for a good time. Plenty of men pay for sessions with pro doms despite that they may have one or two Mistresses available to them to have free sessions with.
Secondly a lot of men enjoy 'paying' for their submission. It humbles them.
quote:
5) A woman’s body is more attractive. Women say they are mistresses although they are very much physically weaker compared to their slave (who might be a man 3 times her size/height). It is just the attitude that matters and feminine attractiveness of the woman, this includes being shorter than the slave and even slimmer. So most web sites have either short or slim women as mistresses even though they are physically weak as mistresses. It's just men only look for female attractiveness (i.e., no large biceps and weak arms); men just don't care about reality even for the short duration for the session. So it’s having a physically strong woman that counts.
Ok you've completely lost Me here...but I'll give it My best shot. It is having a MENTALLY strong woman that counts. Size and statue has little to do with it unless the client has a specific preference for a particular type...Amazon, petite, Matronly, Goddess.
|
|
|
|
