losttreasure
Posts: 875
Joined: 12/17/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kree lost, Congratulations... I dont read or reply to many threads either. Yes, I work and have a life too, so dont feel you are unique.. Having a grasp of the language doesnt mean you have read the things that I, and some others, were responding to. There is no concurrence concerning anything about you because I do not know you, or have a real desire to know someone who feels a need to attack someone when they do not know what was referred to. I also do not think you have been nominated to speak for others, but you felt a need to give them a pass and attack me. Works for me. I included no one in my thoughts. I thanked a few others for their comments because they have seen what I referred to. You, on the other hand, obviously have not seen it, but you just had to spout off. That is fine. I have no desire to enter a discourse with someone who has not seen what was referred to, but has to respond anyway. If you wish to perceive my comments to you as an attack, you are, of course, entitled to do so. However, my intent was to simply bring to your attention the semblant presumptuousness of your original post. Whether you feel that I do or don't have the entire story, is beside the point. Whether you or any other members have, in other threads, expressed similar displeasure at the content of TwiceHappy's posts, is also irrelevant. I see no excuse for your rudeness. And yes, in my opinion you were rude. If you were pleased to see what you regarded as others displaying irritation with TwiceHappy's comments and wished to express your gratitude to them, you should have contacted them individually and privately to do so. Aside from seeing no evidence to support your assertation of mutual annoyance by LA or any of the other commenters, the fact is that your post was addressed in a sweeping generalization that appeared to include some that I happen to know do not share your feelings. Furthermore, even if every other member of this forum was tired of hearing about TwiceHappy's search for a male sub, you did not limit your comments to appreciation for support regarding just that. Your diatribe continued by including insults against TwiceHappy's interests and insinuating that noone cares to hear her mention them. By doing so, you included "LA and others" into that portion of your complaint and projected the appearance of a unified front against TwiceHappy. I honestly have no idea what you mean with regard to anything being concurrent concerning me. I made no reference in my post to anyone agreeing to anything about me. What I did say was, "...despite any perceived collective concurrence by you...", which in other words means, "notwithstanding any impression you might have of group agreement". I apologize if I didn't make myself clear. I would recommend that if, in the future, you have problems with either the contents or frequency of TwiceHappy's posts, you should contact her owners directly with your grievances. Likewise, you are welcome to do the same with mine. Though I don't imagine it will do you much good; he was one of those swept up in your inference, and I believe his response was simply, "Idiot".
|