RE: Cynical assumptions. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


twicehappy -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/2/2006 7:20:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BuxomGoddess714

This lifestyle is about TRUST, which requires honesty.   Not manipulating the most people to your needs or will. 

 
Bravo!!!!!!!!




Lordandmaster -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/2/2006 7:21:15 PM)

I have multiple profiles.  I have Lordandmaster and LRODANDMASTER.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BuxomGoddess714

NOBODY has ever admitted to Me they had multiple profiles.... I'd be cool with that.




gooddogbenji -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/2/2006 10:31:39 PM)

Wait.  LRODANDMASTER is you?  And here I thought she was a cute little Mistress.

Thanks for crushing my dreams of being Dommed by an idiot!

Yours,


benji

PS:  I think I also have 2 profiles, one I used once to make a post here for something or other, but I don't remember the username.  Is that a bad thing?




Sunshine119 -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/2/2006 11:18:26 PM)

Just because I've seen enough arm-chair psychoanalysis going on by this incompetent, I finally had to step in.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhipTheHip

"Their general attitude is many people are flakey, inconsistent and selfish. It's
the nature of the beast, and I am proven correct time after time in this. My
cynicism is reserved for people at large, not my proven intimates. (by Homestead)"

Nearly word-for-word, this comes straight from a textbook description of
someone with paranoid personality disorder.  I can't say anything about
Homestead since I have never met the man.


Wrong......
"Paranoid Personality Disorder" - from DSM-IV
A. A pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others such that their motives are interpreted as malevolent, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of the following: 
(1) suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her 
(2) is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or trustworthiness of friends or associates 
(3) is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against him or her 
(4) reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events 
(5) persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights 
(6) perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack 
(7) has recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding fidelity of spouse or sexual partner 
B. Does not occur exclusively during the course of Schizophrenia, a Mood Disorder With Psychotic Features, or another Psychotic Disorder and is not due to the direct physiological effects of a general medical condition.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhipTheHip

Most people
need love.  People who are satisfied
with their own love are narcissists.  It is

quite normal for people to need others


Wrong Again!!  Narcissists are exactly opposite this.

Once again.....from the DSM-IV

Narcissistic Personality Disorder:
A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:  (1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)  (2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love  (3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)  (4) requires excessive admiration  (5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations  (6) is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends  (7) lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others  (8) is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her  (9) shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

And finally, I have to wonder what you mean when you say you have PTSS????  Do you mean Post Traumatic Stress Disorder? (PTSD) Or is it some other illness that you developed along the way?


What do you think you're dealing with here....imbeciles?  There are more social workers and psychologists on this board than you can imagine, and I'm not even one of them, yet I know better than tossing out diagnoses I have no knowlege of and assuming the rest will accept your definition.


Sorry for the long rant folks, I've had more than enough too!

Sunshine
(edited for screwed up fonts)




Aine -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 1:43:12 AM)

Fuck.  How many days did I miss?

It is WAY too early in the morning to (or should I say late of a night) to read through another 6 pages that I've missed.

Updates later.




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 2:17:10 AM)

Why do people have to jump all over eachother and fight? It can really ruin a thread. Peace and love, peace and love, peace and love...

- Susan 




gooddogbenji -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 4:29:44 AM)

Hey!  I tried pissing on him with love.  It was he who started with the name calling....  LOL

Yours,


benji




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 4:31:14 AM)

Well, I know benji, all of this fighting just puts me between a rock and a hard place - because I love you both!!
HUGS. [:)] I like everybody. I hate it when people fight. It's not just you, benji. People do this all the time in other threads, too. 

- Susan




gooddogbenji -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 4:33:45 AM)

(Okay, Susan, I hate to burst your bubble, but you may be the last one standing with that last opinion)

Yours,


benji




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 4:36:17 AM)

Maybe. I just don't like fighting. It's not just this thread. I've seen it happen all over some other threads, too. It certainly isn't "just you". I see it all the time.
MORE HUGs.
[:)]

- Susan




LaTigresse -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 7:11:10 AM)

Susan, try changing your perspective. Don't see it as fighting but as an energetic "debate"!




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 8:32:25 AM)

Okay, LaTigresse! Happy Sunday!
[:)]
- Susan




FirmhandKY -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 12:08:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Why do people have to jump all over eachother and fight? It can really ruin a thread. Peace and love, peace and love, peace and love...

- Susan 


Susan,

Unfortunately, there are some people, and some situations were "peace and love" simply cannot exist.

Unlike you, there are some people who really enjoy conflict and uproar, and they set out to create it, and then they "feed" on the result.

A good debate, and disagreements argued vigorously are one thing.  But when someone (like WtH) comes into a forum with a suspicious profile (and photo as has been pointed out), and pretends ignorance yet makes inflammatory remarks constantly (remember his dolcett threads? ), one of the questions you should ask yourself is ... what are his motives?

Sure, it's always possible that his motives are curiosity, and a search for knowledge.  You yourself have started many a thread that could have degenerated into something less than polite conversation - yet they haven't. 

Why do you think that is?

No, the general consensus (with which I agree) is that WtH is someone on a "lark", who has entered this forum for the one and only purpose of causing conflict.  Part of doing that is getting members of the forum to fight each other, so he can sit back and laugh.

You are a conscientious, well liked member of the forum.  You are also a "seeker" and a peace-maker.  I think he has latched onto you - trying to manipulate you - for his own ends of causing more conflict and dissension here.

So, while you do not wish, nor seek conflict, be careful that you do not get hurt by others seeking to use you to cause it.

As far as WtH is concerned, this thread isn't "ruined" - it's exactly what he set out for it to be, until he was recognized for what he is.

FHky






Homestead -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 12:55:54 PM)

We call this sort of person a "flame troll" susan.

They are emotional sadists, annoying little monkies who get off on causing hatred and distress.

Don't believe the claims they make, since they will use any lie or deception to get the emotional feedback they are looking for. Just look at how they interact with people, and the results. It's all designed to stir things up, nothing of value is ever accomplished.

The fact that they claim to be innocent doesn't make it so-they are simply users looking for kicks. The short anwer to this individual, is to starve them of attention by refusing to play thier game.

Please don't feed the monkey!!!!!!!!!![&:]




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 1:07:42 PM)

I don't honestly remember what he said that was that inflammatory. Maybe I should go back and re-read the thread...but I like WhiptheHip. I do think nobody should be run off the boards. If people don't like what he says, they should just ignore it. I don't think he'd intentionally hurt anybody. I really don't.

- Susan




Lordandmaster -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 1:12:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

I don't honestly remember what he said that was that inflammatory. Maybe I should go back and re-read the thread...but I like WhiptheHip. I do think nobody should be run off the boards. If people don't like what he says, they should just ignore it. I don't think he'd intentionally hurt anybody. I really don't.


You're kidding, right?  This isn't intentionally hurting someone?

quote:

Your brain is fried.  You need to be put in straight-jacket and locked down tight
in a mental
institution.    Or maybe it's that broomstick up your ass, or having

engaged in too much breath play.   You're two brain cells short of a pair.
Why don't you fuck-off.   Don't you have anything better to do with your
time than follow me around collarme.com attacking everything I say with
masturbatory nonsense.  Get a life.  Grow-up.

 
Makes me wonder what you think "intentionally" means.




Level -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 1:15:34 PM)

My opinion of Whip came when he responded to a post of mine (keep in mind we had never spoke before) with : "this is so much bullshit".... ......... so much for "super empathic, compassionate, understanding, comforting, patient, and loving."




SusanofO -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 2:38:58 PM)

Well okay, maybe that's a little strong, yes. But - do keep in mind that sometimes on these boards, there have been times when someone will say something and the other person will just get their feelings hurt and say something back that sounds defensive (becasue it is, but it also might be understandable why they are feeling defensive), and then someone else chimes in and jumps on their case, and pretty soon, everyone is jumping on their case, when it all could have stopped with a simple: "Well, maybe you're right". And in the case above that LA mentioned, think how ridiculously transparent it would have been to respond with: "Yes. Indeed you are correct. I do have a broom up my ass". End of that conversation, I would imagine. I dunno. I just want to see people get along. But I do understand what you say. I've had conversations like that once in awhile, myself.

- Susan  




Homestead -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 2:45:41 PM)

The man has proved to me that he's a hypocrite susan. Not worth my time.




Level -> RE: Cynical assumptions. (9/3/2006 3:00:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Well okay, maybe that's a little strong, yes. But - do keep in mind that sometimes on these boards, there have been times when someone will say something and the other person will just get their feelings hurt and say something back that sounds defensive (becasue it is, but it also might be understandable why they are feeling defensive), and then someone else chimes in and jumps on their case, and pretty soon, everyone is jumping on their case, when it all could have stopped with a simple: "Well, maybe you're right". And in the case above that LA mentioned, think how ridiculously transparent it would have been to respond with: "Yes. Indeed you are correct. I do have a broom up my ass". End of that conversation, I would imagine. I dunno. I just want to see people get along. But I do understand what you say. I've had conversations like that once in awhile, myself.

- Susan  


Or we can have a big brawl!
 
Some folks would do well to learn "you may be right", and some need that broom stuck up their ass LOL.
 
I wonder if I might be this generation's Ghandi..... [X(]




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 12 [13] 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.201172E-02