RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


kittensmailbox -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 3:55:28 PM)

Slaves,? no... a sub?, yes... from my understanding, slaves give up all rights and therefor do not have any...




bandit25 -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:01:58 PM)

But, see, kitten...here's the problem...suppose the slave chose a very bad Master (and by "bad", I mean bad for that particular slave)...and He or She forbids the slave to leave...that slave can't leave?  He or she has to stay and serve this "bad" Master? 

Or suppose this Master likes a specific kink the slave has absolutely NO interest in...again, must that slave do as the Master commands?  What if the Master demands a toilet slave and, up to now, they (master and slave) have agreed that toilet would never be part of the service. 

OF COURSE the slave has a responsibility to him or herself to leave said Master...even if it is forbidden. 




popeye1250 -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:09:53 PM)

Bandit, it's an enigma.
There really is no (correct) answer.




bandit25 -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:10:35 PM)

I suppose you're right...what's correct for one isn't always correct for another.




mnottertail -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:12:12 PM)

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, but is it wrapped in a mystery?






bandit25 -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:15:36 PM)

Flour tortilla, I think.




ownedgirlie -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:54:49 PM)

Yum!  Brings the guacamole...




FelinePersuasion -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 4:57:50 PM)

You know that reminds me, I like good guac, but I hate it when manufactuer's and stuff fuck with seasoning and whipping and blending an this that and the other so the finished produc is nothing like authentic guac
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

Yum!  Brings the guacamole...




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:00:02 PM)

You stop. There shouldn't even be a question. If she says no and you go ahead you are violating the trust she placed in you and becoming a rapist who isn't worth trusting.




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:01:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yourkajira

quote:

ORIGINAL: DivinityWitheld

Always, the real control of a relationship is in the subs, the sub draws the line, the sub normaly is allowing the dominant freedom, the only check to the freedom is the slaves word.


But there is a difference between a "slave" and a "sub"


There is a difference between a slave and sub but in the BDSM world we are slaves in the literal sense of being actual property with no rights of our own. We have still have the right to say no and if a Master does not respect that his slave has a few hard-limits... then he's not worth being called Master.




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:02:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer

I disagree both parties have the right to walk, so the party who is most ready to walk that tends to have the control, regardless of which side of the d/s they are.




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:03:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yourkajira

quote:

ORIGINAL: DiurnalVampire

I agree with Archer.  Both sides can say no at any point. There should be the mutual respect in the relationship t understand that if the slave doesnt want o do something, there is a reason. To push a slave to the point they are wiling to say no to you means there usually is a damn god reason they do so, and that should be taken into account.  My boy is a slave, and I kow that he is obedient to a fault, so for him to say no, evne ifhe cannot immediately explain why, he hs his reasons for not wanting to or being able to do something. I simply get that reason.

DV



I would have thought that He would have known that it was important. I have NEVER said no to anything that He wanted. After all, He is the one who wakes me up kicking and screaming in the night.




ownedgirlie -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:05:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FelinePersuasion

You know that reminds me, I like good guac, but I hate it when manufactuer's and stuff fuck with seasoning and whipping and blending an this that and the other so the finished produc is nothing like authentic guac
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

Yum!  Brings the guacamole...


*chuckles* It's home made or nothing, for me.




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:05:54 PM)

[/quote]
He said that i didnt matter, that what i want or felt made no difference. i am the slave, this is what he wants and he was gonna do it, so shut up and relax

[/quote]

Please tell me you have left him.




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:08:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: millisande

Greetings all: Masters, Mistresses, Switches, subs, slaves, and undecided alike.

i am about to do the unpopular thing... i'm going to that a slave does not have the right to tell his/her Master/Mistress 'no.'
One of the things that you do when you choose to become a slave is give up your rights to another.
Now, assuming(yeah, i know, ass-you-me, and all that) that you knew what you were doing when you made your screne name Yourkajira, i have a little quote for you. a couple of them actually. These are from the books of Gor, as, well, that is what your name implies.
Read, think, respond, if you wish, and are permitted to do so.

“The life of a female slave,” he said, “is a life wholly given over to love. It is not a compromised life. It is not one of those lives which is part this, and part that. It is a total way of life, a total life. The female slave seeks to give all, selflessly, knowing that she, as she is a mere slave, a rightless animal owned by her master, one who can be bought and sold at his least whim, can make no claims, that she deserves nothing, and is entitled to not the least attention or consideration. There are no bargains made with her, no arrangements.”
Mercenaries of Gor - Page 435
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The slave is not a person before Gorean law but a rightless animal.
Slave Girl of Gor - Page 151
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the eyes of Goreans, and Gorean law, the slave is an animal. She is not a person, but an animal. She has no name, saving what her master might choose to call her. She is without caste. She is without citizenship. She is simply an object, to be bartered, or bought or sold. She is simply an article of property, completely, nothing more.
Hunters of Gor - Page 148
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, my dear, you are legally an animal. In the eyes of Gorean law you are an animal. You have no name in your own right. You may be collared and leashed. You may be bought and sold, whipped, treated as the master pleases, disposed of as he sees fit. You have no rights whatsoever.Explorers of Gor - Page 316--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just a few notes... Yes, i am aware that earth is not Gor. Yes, i am aware that there is no legal slavery here. No, i do not live in a world of fantasy. The thoughts presented in the above quotes, however, do make up a small bit of the Gorean philosophy as it applies to the keeping of slaves.

A further note: Just because one has a piece of property, does not mean one should abuse it. If i set my house on fire, it would cease to be a good house, now wouldn't it? Nor does any of this mean that, if you are legitimately concerned, you should not talk to your Master. After all, how can He make the best decisions reguarding His property, if He does not have all the applicable data?

Best of wishes to thee and thine,With all respect, and in hopes that this is pleasing to the Free,
bina, of Wolf.

<message edited for stupidity>



She didn't say she was Goran and she is not then you can't quote those rules as applying to her




KnightofMists -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:12:51 PM)

Any Person of any Orientation has the ability to say No.... The question is... does one wish to accept the Consequences of saying No or Not saying No.... and secondly... what are the consequences? 




AquaticSub -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:17:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhipTheHip

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yourkajira
In certain cases. for example, you have a slave and you are interested in anal sex. you are not interested in lube, or whatever, and when you do (she obediently complies) the girl who has such a high pain tolerence begs you stop, because it hurts too much.Now, this is a girl who has been raped (on several different occurances) in the past and you know this. Do you tell her basically that she has no right to deny you something that you want, and do it anyway, especially if you are...um...well endowed and don't take it easy. So, do you stop or tell her to shut up?


You stop.   Latter, you might ask if she really wanted you to stop.   But there is no question,
you shouldn't do anything she doesn't want you to do, unless that was clearly negotiated
IMEDIATELY beforehand and put on paper.  For the sake of not causing tissue damage,
you should always use lube.   Not using lots of lube in my opinion is insane.  There needs
to be a lot better communication between sub and slave.  This question would never
come up, had this been discussed with the sub before hand.  What makes bdsm
legal is the fact that it is consensual.  And consensual requires a level of communication
to ensure there are no misunderstandings. 
 
In any event you need to be very careful when you do anything like this to make
sure you don't tear tissue or cause any damage.    Any dom who causes physical
damage to their sub, should be hung by his balls.  If this law was in effect, would
you stop, if your sub asked you to stop during such an act.
 
Even if a sub told me before hand that I could do this, I would stop.    It is the Top's
ultimate responsibility not to damage the body of the sub.  If a sub begged me to
damage her body, I would not do it.  It would also be against the law in many
states and a prosecutable offense.    You can't legally damage somone's body,
even if they consent.
 
Concerning the fact she was raped in the past, this is something that requires
extensive discussion before play, and you need to discuss how forced play
would effect her.  In a situation like this you need to be extra careful, not to
damage her psyche.  It is always better to err on the side of caution and safety. 
You can always ask her she felt about it.  If you are into forcing her to endure
things she really doesn't want, and you know she raped, you have to find out if
this is really something she generally wants you to do.  If you are doing it against
her general wishes then you are being abusive and taking advantage of her.
 
If you are the sub, you should get therapy and flee from this guy.   He is
dangerous and uncaring.
 
Except for real tissue damage, everything is negotiable and should be
negotiated before hand.  If a top does something without first getting
consent, it is most likely a crime and a presecutable offense.  If a top
does something without consent, that you really didn't like, you should
flee from this top or dom.    A collar is not a license to abuse a sub or
violate the law.



For the line "hung by his balls" I love you.




leila7 -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 5:21:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DivinityWitheld

Always, the real control of a relationship is in the subs, the sub draws the line, the sub normaly is allowing the dominant freedom, the only check to the freedom is the slaves word.


Interesting.  I have always laughed at this particular construct.  The "real" control of a relationship is a mutual thing.  Sorry to burst the bubble, but this particular concept is based on the idea that if the sub isn't kept happy then the sub leaves, and therefore the sub has all the "control" in the relationshiop.   Guess what?  The reverse is also true.  If the dom isn't kept happy then the dom leaves, and therefore the dom has just as much control in the relationship.

Relationship is the key word here.  A D/s RELATIONSHIP involves give and take on both sides.  If the Dom proves to be an insensitive ass who uses the sub without regard for their mental and  physical health and well being, the dom ends up minus a sub.   If a sub proves to be an insensitive ass who is using the dom just to get their own needs met without any consideration for the needs of the dom, the sub ends up without a dom.  

Relationships work or do not work based on the people involved in those relationships. 

And before someone tells me I "don't get it" ... I have been a slave for over 6 years.  Negotiation with my Sir typically consists of "Slave... do this."  Yes Sir. 

I can respond that way because I know Sir will never harm me.  He might hurt me (and does when it pleases him) but he will not harm me.  If that were to change, Sir will be minus a slave. 

Sir can operate in that fashion because he knows I will do as I have promised to do.  I will serve him in all ways that he requires of me.  He trusts me to do as I have said.  If that changes, then I will find myself minus a master. 

Who is in control?  Ultimately, we both are. 




DivaDuchess -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 6:15:18 PM)

I might be repeating a previous post, it took me almost 20 minutes to read them all *lol* ... All Our slaves have a 'trigger word' ... by which all action stops, immediately.  I would discuss with your Master, setting up something like that and open up to Them about your past, present and future history and expectations.  Good luck to you.




sweetnurseBBW -> RE: Do slaves have the right to say no? (9/3/2006 6:47:44 PM)

If something is trully causing her excruciating pain and shes not enjoying it, why keep hurting her? Theres a point when it isnt fun anymore and is a safeword is used it is time to stop. Slaves do have feelings and can lose trust if their feelings are abused.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875