RE: Democrats can't win without my vote.

RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Lordandmaster -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:19:33 PM)
Maybe it was a hotel for failed physicists.

juliaoceania -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:21:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SirKenin He had My attention as far as "Al Gore won" and then I figured he was some kid on glue. Al Gore lost by one vote.. on the supreme court. He won Florida, but since the votes were never counted he never got to claim it.

Lordandmaster -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:24:10 PM)
Please let's not get into the question of whose views are more reasonable, Kenin's or Whipthehip's...

Level -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:40:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: ORIGINAL: SirKenin He had My attention as far as "Al Gore won" and then I figured he was some kid on glue. Al Gore lost by one vote.. on the supreme court. He won Florida, but since the votes were never counted he never got to claim it. Un uh...... [:-]

NorthernGent -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:42:08 PM)
Whip, Read a few of your posts and I still can't decide if you're being serious or taking the piss - "I am a superhawk neo-con" - what's one of them? is it one of Batman's crowd or a motorbike? What's the point in giving yourself strange labels? You believe prisoners should be treated humanely but you want them executed where proven guilty. You must be having a laugh - my guess is you're one of the regular posters messing around - now which one could it be? Regards

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:45:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: ORIGINAL: SirKenin He had My attention as far as "Al Gore won" and then I figured he was some kid on glue. Saying something over and over doesn't make it true. Every single investigation done (many by newspapers that hate Bush) showed that President Bush won Florida. You can try to rewite history all you want, Gore lost. If he would have won his own home state, then he would be president today. He couldn't even do that.

SirKenin -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 12:56:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster Please let's not get into the question of whose views are more reasonable, Kenin's or Whipthehip's... As long as they do not assume that anything you say is factual, the rest is forgivable.

peterK50 -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:17:23 PM)
The Democratic party can win without your vote. The votes they cannot win without are those who would vote for Carrot Top if he said, "I'm pro-God/Pro-Family" [whatever that means, who's anti-God, anti-family?], "I'm anti-abortion", [except in cases or rape/incest/or the health of the mother meaning basically you are NOT anti-abortion] "I'm for lower taxes" [not lower spending]. In other words the Democrats must seize the moron vote from the Republicans.

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:26:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: peterK50 The Democratic party can win without your vote. The votes they cannot win without are those who would vote for Carrot Top if he said, "I'm pro-God/Pro-Family" [whatever that means, who's anti-God, anti-family?], "I'm anti-abortion", [except in cases or rape/incest/or the health of the mother meaning basically you are NOT anti-abortion] "I'm for lower taxes" [not lower spending]. In other words the Democrats must seize the moron vote from the Republicans. Who's anti-God, who's anti-family? That is funny. Are you really Carrot Top?

gooddogbenji -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:32:02 PM)
I'm anti God, just for the record. Yours, benji

youngmama -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:38:11 PM)
ok maybe I read it wrong or misunderstood but: I would legalize drugs, even though I have never used drugs. and......... I think female crack addicts need to be Norplanted. What about the males? You can't Norplant males. There is no equivalent. There is nothing sadder than a crack-addicted baby born to a homeless crack addict that can't feed herself. Doesn't that kinda contradict itself? You want to legalize it but you also want to stop mothers from having crack addicted babys. You make it easier to get and then Norplant them. Don't get me wrong, I do not condone using illegall drugs especially if your pregnant or if you have children depending on you. If I didn't understand it completely please ignore this post. Otherwise this is just my $0.02

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:42:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji I'm anti God, just for the record. Yours, benji But benji, God spelled backwards is Dog.[;)]

MistressWolfen -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:43:31 PM)
My vote is that he is a brilliant physicist that must moonlight as a hostelier to support his time travel machine that he keeps in the basement. (phew that was a run-on-sentence) This is the machine he used to take a pic of himself 4 years in the future when he turned 40.

seeksfemslave -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 1:53:06 PM)
Well old whipthehip certainly shook the Liberals up a bit. If you want to see the damage mindless liberalism can do you want to visit the UK. Everything they offer is so reasonable, or so it seems, until it is actually applied then wham everything falls over.. eg treating young criminals "nice" ....bound over: that is warnings not to do it again because its wrong, suspended sentences, community service.and whats the result...more young criminals...then what do the liberals do...well they cant be wrong so they just apply more of the same and what happens... the same old anti social behaviour just repeats itself again and again. By the time generation A's juices have dried up a bit generation B appears on the scene...and so it goes. I just wonder what has got to occur before they begin have even the slightest question that maybe their social philosophy has at least a few flaws. Just to add that liberalism as we see it in the UK might not translate to US. Not sure.

peterK50 -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 2:03:43 PM)
we'll still count Estring solidly in the moron vote

WhipTheHip -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 2:36:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: ORIGINAL: SirKenin He had My attention as far as "Al Gore won" and then I figured he was some kid on glue. Al Gore lost by one vote.. on the supreme court. He won Florida, but since the votes were never counted he never got to claim it. Exactly, and the shame is all the Democratic judges in Florida bent over backwards to be fair to Bush. Whereas the benefit of the doubt should go to the voter who votes on election day, questionable mail-in votes should be rejected because there is so much fraud and manipulation with mail-in votes, yet the Democratic judge ruled for Bush, and Gore never appealed the decision. Now we have bad precedent.

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 2:51:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave Well old whipthehip certainly shook the Liberals up a bit. If you want to see the damage mindless liberalism can do you want to visit the UK. Everything they offer is so reasonable, or so it seems, until it is actually applied then wham everything falls over.. eg treating young criminals "nice" ....bound over: that is warnings not to do it again because its wrong, suspended sentences, community service.and whats the result...more young criminals...then what do the liberals do...well they cant be wrong so they just apply more of the same and what happens... the same old anti social behaviour just repeats itself again and again. By the time generation A's juices have dried up a bit generation B appears on the scene...and so it goes. I just wonder what has got to occur before they begin have even the slightest question that maybe their social philosophy has at least a few flaws. Just to add that liberalism as we see it in the UK might not translate to US. Not sure. They will never get it. We have people in the US yelling all the time about "universal health care". Show me where it works? It doesn't. Why do you think that people that can afford to, always go with private care? Because if you make it "universal", it is going to suck! If you want equal, you will not get quality. You get one or the other.

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 2:53:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: peterK50 we'll still count Estring solidly in the moron vote If having ideas and facts to back them up instead of just name calling and bumper sticker sloganeering makes me a moron, well hell. I guess I am a moron.

WhipTheHip -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 2:54:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: youngmama ok maybe I read it wrong or misunderstood but: I would legalize drugs, even though I have never used drugs. and......... I think female crack addicts need to be Norplanted. What about the males? You can't Norplant males. There is no equivalent. There is nothing sadder than a crack-addicted baby born to a homeless crack addict that can't feed herself. Doesn't that kinda contradict itself? You want to legalize it but you also want to stop mothers from having crack addicted babys. You make it easier to get and then Norplant them. Don't get me wrong, I do not condone using illegall drugs especially if your pregnant or if you have children depending on you. If I didn't understand it completely please ignore this post. Otherwise this is just my $0.02 Drugs couldn't be any easier to get than they are now. Making drugs legal would not increase the drug population by one person. The reason most people don't use drugs is not because they are illegal and hard to get. Would you suddenly start using crack if it were made legal and easy to get? I would show students in school what the life of a crack addict looks like. I would pay Hollywood producers to make realistic documentries, and require it be shown every year to every student from grade six and up. Even though I would make drugs legal for adults, I would outlaw adults giving it to children. Any person caught giving drugs to a child ought to be given a minimum mandatory ten year sentence. A pregnant female who uses crack is supplying crack to a baby against its will. The sadist thing I see is psychotic, AIDS-infected, homeless crack addicts giving birth to child after child. This is one reason America is so fucked up.

Estring -> RE: Democrats can't win without my vote. (9/2/2006 3:04:09 PM)
Even though I would make drugs legal for adults, I would outlaw adults giving it to children. Well, there is where you lost me.[;)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875