OriginalWench -> RE: Is abuse a precurser for being a slave/sub? (9/3/2006 10:40:51 PM)
|
I can't answer this poll simply because none of the answers actually apply to me. I am not a sub, nor am I a dom. I am a switch. Two things I've read here really jumped out at me. quote:
ORIGINAL: ownedandcollared however, taught to have something of a casual disregard of those who label themselves "switches" because they don't know themselves well enough to know who they are. Well. You can have a casual disregard all you want, but I have a pretty solid knowledge of myself, and I am a switch. I know what I want, when I want it, how I want it, and who I want it with. I know what I need. I know my body inside and out (too well sometimes). I'm pretty darn secure in who I am, and pretty comfortable with myself, even though I'm not perfect. quote:
ORIGINAL: julietsierra Well geez! Aside from all the pop psychology mumbo jumbo, I kind of look at this from a chicken and the egg point of view. Which came first? The abuse leading to submission or the submission opening ourselves up for abuse. I'd have to say that submission certainly wasn't what opened me up for abuse. It wasn't submission, it was that I had NO choice. I was too young to remember when the abuse started in my life, and was starting into my 30s before I truly got away from it. Now, in my late 30s, I can say that I've done a LOT of healing, learned a LOT about myself, and have a LOT of good things in my life. On the topic of submission, there is only one person I have ever felt submissive to. That is The Mate. In any other relationship, I am generally the one who runs it, who makes the decisions, who becomes the caretaker, who takes responsibility, who get her way... however you want to put it. Granted, I've had to submit unwillingly (during the abuse), but nobody ever subdued my spirit. Now, I submit to The Mate because I want to, and it's worth it to know that doesn't mean I have to be broken or weak to do so.
|
|
|
|