Homestead
Posts: 1005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: julietsierra But there was no negotiation. No conversations regarding limits, no nothing. Negotiation implies compromise - a give and take. Negotiation isn't where one person says "choose A.. or .. A" and the other person says "I choose A." Negotiation is "I choose A but with these tiny amendments" and then waits to see if the amendments are amenable to the other person. When you sign up for a fitness club, they give you a contract and sign it. There is no negotiation on the price or terms. It just is what is. The only other choice is to walk away - and not agree. Mine's kind of that fitness club contract. No negotiations. I wasn't talking about a deal being agreed to. I was talking specifically about a negotiation process. When a precedent for negotiation is in place, it presumes that the conditions can be altered later for whatever reasons. To me, health is not a reason. It's common sense. And yes, I know, I'm probably splitting hairs, but that whole "do this and this and this to me, but not that and that" process is what we did NOT do. I'm not a "no limits" person (I'd just about lose my head over decapitation play...and amputee play is nothing to break a leg over), but agreed outright (without actually knowing what they were), that his limits are mine. juliet When I offer "my way or the highway" it is still a negotiation, a choice. Yes, or no. The slave can renegotiate by leaving at any moment. It's still a deal.
|