Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, wounds more than 30


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, wounds more than 30 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 8:48:42 AM   
MistressWolfen


Posts: 578
Joined: 6/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Well, the way I see it I have never fought in a war.  I am now too old to do so.  I will never know what life is like through their eyes, so I will not judge, nor am I qualified to make comment.


Like you Kenin, I am not qualified to comment, but still seek some understanding from those that are; by virtue of experience (thanks Ken) or cognitive understanding of the situation (thanks meatcleaver).

_____________________________

Quoth the raven

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 9:13:59 AM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
And you know who can probably help?  IronBear.  I do not know where he is, but he apparently has military experience.  Maybe he will share his insight.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to MistressWolfen)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 10:33:11 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Ken,

I always love those who use "you don't have any direct experience so you can't comment" to shut others down.  Hearing that argument by someone who is religious is especially ironic.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 10:57:04 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

US troops in general rarely train with other countries, that is especially true of guard troops.  However, since the british and other troops wear uniforms and carry weapons with VERY distinct profiles (those stupid bullpups) one would think they would stand out from Afghans with AKs.


I have trained with and have trained British, French (regulars and foreigh legion), German, Dutch, Irainian (during the period of the Shaw of Iran), Ethiopian, Eritriean, and Italian militaries.  I have been to school with a Major from Libia before we broke off relations with them.   I have had 20 years experience.

My son with South African, Italian, German, British, Russian, Korean, Philipine (he only had 10 years active duty before being medically retired).   My son also made the trip to Rewanda but I don't think he interacted with their military to much.

And yes   I have been on the recieving end of friendly fire (from the Ethiopian Army).   I just didn't get hit.

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:01:52 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

Ken,

I always love those who use "you don't have any direct experience so you can't comment" to shut others down.  Hearing that argument by someone who is religious is especially ironic.


Uhhhhhhhhh   When did I say this?

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:09:23 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
dicky,

So you are saying you are representative of "most" army troops?  Do "most" troops serve 20 years?  I doubt any of it was in the national guard?  Were you in a standard infantry unit?  Sounds more to me like you were airborne or special forces of some type and were sent overseas to train others.  Again, that is not the experience of average troops.

We bring a great deal of foreign troops here to train but their contact with the wider army is limited which is why my post was written the way it was.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:11:38 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Here is a variable that most people don't think of.   US personnel and vehicles have laser identity tags on them as well as stripes (which are easily duplicated), etc.  Wonder how many of our friends have gone to that expense to aid in preventing friendly fire incidents?   I am sure I don't know.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:29:52 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

dicky,

So you are saying you are representative of "most" army troops?  Do "most" troops serve 20 years?  I doubt any of it was in the national guard?  Were you in a standard infantry unit?  Sounds more to me like you were airborne or special forces of some type and were sent overseas to train others.  Again, that is not the experience of average troops.

We bring a great deal of foreign troops here to train but their contact with the wider army is limited which is why my post was written the way it was.


ROFLMAO  Crappy you are so funny.  Where did I specifically say that I was representative of "most" soldiers?   I know better.  

I was in the Transportation Corps.   I coordinated the movement of people and equipment around the world.  My son was airborne infantry (I personally believe he was a fool for intentionally jumping out of perfectly good airplanes - and he admitted to landing on his head once).

I was also a logistician with a more than basic understanding of the logistics steam.   However, I have worked with infantry, armor, and artillary (the 3 combat arms) in the field.   Yes I had to teach infantry small unit tactics to my soldiers to help keep them alive - it is a basic requirement for all US soldiers.  There are only 54 slots Army wide (at the time of my retirement) for logisticians with my qualifications.  it was only 75% full of qualified soldiers.  Yes it limited my assignments to specific locations and jobs.   No it didn't keep me out of the field and away from other militaries.

As for was any of it in the National Guard.   Well let me see.   Although I was an active soldier I was responsible for the transportation of an entire US Army worth of Active, Reserve and National Guard Troops within the Continental US.  Yes I was in the field with them.   Yes I have trained with them and trained them.   yes I have had them serve as my superior officer.   Does that satisfy you any?

The average continental US division (including National Guard and Reserve troops) went overseas to various countries for multinational nato exercises like Reforger (return of the force to europe) every year or two.  that is everyone, not just those spending 20 years.

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:30:34 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
British fury at 'cowboy' US pilot's deadly error
March 31 2003, 10:21 AM

British soldiers injured when an American "tankbuster" aircraft attacked their convoy, killing one of their comrades, hit out angrily at the "cowboy" pilot today.
Troops wounded in Friday's attack accused the A-10 Thunderbolt pilot of "incompetence and negligence" while others privately called for a manslaughter prosecution.

Lance Corporal of Horse Steven Gerrard, speaking from his bed on the RFA Argus in the Gulf, said: "I can command my vehicle. I can keep it from being attacked. What I have not been trained to do is look over my shoulder to see whether an American is shooting at me."


There was a Union Jack on the back of one of the engineers' vehicles.
"It's about 18 inches wide by about 12 inches. For him to fire his weapons, I believe he had to look through his magnified optics. How he could not see that Union Jack I don't know."

Trooper Chris Finney, 18, added: "All the wagons have markings to say they are Coalition. I don't know why he shot a second time, he was that close.
"To be honest, I think they are just ignorant. I don't know if they haven't been trained or are just trigger happy."


Trooper Joe Woodgate, 19, the driver of the Scimitar in which gunner LCoH Hull was killed, walked away with holes in his bullet-proof vest and torn clothes.
He told The Guardian: "I don't suppose they have learned much from the first war. I can tell what an American tank looks like from every direction.
"How come somebody who is a top-notch Thunderbolt pilot can't tell what a British tank looks like?"

To be fair...

Another two British soldiers were killed when their Challenger 2 Main Battle tank was engaged by another British tank west of Basra.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:33:57 AM   
ThickLadyJane


Posts: 4
Joined: 9/4/2006
Status: offline
My brother is a Marine serving in Iraq right now. How can we judge these men and women who live every day in fear of their lives. You have children that have run up to convoys looking friendly, only to turn out to be suicide bombers. You have afghani police who are really terrorist in disguise. None of us were there to judge the incident for ourselves. As a member of a community that is often wrongly viewed and judged by others I would hope we would be less judgemental ourselves. I don't dispute the corruption in our government, lack of training and equipment, and i don't agree with the polotics of this war at all. But it disturbs me to see and hear the harsh criticism of our troops themselves. Most of them are young boys, who are putting their lives on hold and on the line, and if they are like my brother they are not doing it for the war on terrorism. They are doing it because they understand that in order for the rest of us to have the freedom to do things like critisize our country, someone has to fight. The corrupt government is the fault of those of us who do not use our right and responsibility to vote for responsible leaders.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:40:34 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
I should have done this before but I checked out the ACTUAL statistics, at least for Iraq and about half of the 19 reported friendly fire victims, about half were American.  However, that is such a tiny number that it is impossible to draw much conclusion from that.  One thing to keep in mind is Americans represent the majority of troops so it makes sense that the majority of accidents would result from American  and that bears out in what few numbers we have.

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:41:08 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

British fury at 'cowboy' US pilot's deadly error
March 31 2003, 10:21 AM

British soldiers injured when an American "tankbuster" aircraft attacked their convoy, killing one of their comrades, hit out angrily at the "cowboy" pilot today.
Troops wounded in Friday's attack accused the A-10 Thunderbolt pilot of "incompetence and negligence" while others privately called for a manslaughter prosecution.

Lance Corporal of Horse Steven Gerrard, speaking from his bed on the RFA Argus in the Gulf, said: "I can command my vehicle. I can keep it from being attacked. What I have not been trained to do is look over my shoulder to see whether an American is shooting at me."


There was a Union Jack on the back of one of the engineers' vehicles.
"It's about 18 inches wide by about 12 inches. For him to fire his weapons, I believe he had to look through his magnified optics. How he could not see that Union Jack I don't know."

Trooper Chris Finney, 18, added: "All the wagons have markings to say they are Coalition. I don't know why he shot a second time, he was that close.
"To be honest, I think they are just ignorant. I don't know if they haven't been trained or are just trigger happy."


Trooper Joe Woodgate, 19, the driver of the Scimitar in which gunner LCoH Hull was killed, walked away with holes in his bullet-proof vest and torn clothes.
He told The Guardian: "I don't suppose they have learned much from the first war. I can tell what an American tank looks like from every direction.
"How come somebody who is a top-notch Thunderbolt pilot can't tell what a British tank looks like?"

To be fair...

Another two British soldiers were killed when their Challenger 2 Main Battle tank was engaged by another British tank west of Basra.


Hmmmmmmm as I understand it a guy moving at high speed must spot a flag the size of a small safety poster from how far away?   OK   again   what happened to the laser recongnition devices on the british vehicles and soldiers?

and it seems the british are doing it to themselves in the same or similar same country tanks?  hmmmmmm  

It is bad no matter who or why it was done.  but unfortunately it does happen.  btw a couriosity question.   are they going to prosecute the british soldier for shooting at his buds?

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:48:35 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Kendcky,

In my original post, I was refering to average soldier, not specialized troops like yourself.

As for things like operation Reforger, the last one was held well over a decade ago...
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/reforger.htm

quote:

  In April 1993, the last REFORGER, a mere shadow of the original, included only a part of one unit from the United States. It was a logistical exercise, largely computer-driven.



< Message edited by CrappyDom -- 9/5/2006 11:53:02 AM >

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:49:18 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Crappy told me by e-mail to kiss his azz and called me a little putz.   ROFL   I weigh 247 and am 5'9"   think that qualifies me as a fat putz    What you think?  LOL

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:56:25 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
KenDckey,

I find that prodding the average asshole gets them to really flip out and I enjoy the reaction.  Sort of like driving by a guy in one of those huge jacked up pickup trucks and giving them the "little dick" symbol and watching them flip out.

You ruined it all by having a sense of humor...

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:56:42 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
The complaints I've heard are not about blue on blue incidents in the heat of fighting, everyone understands how they happen but in situations where there has been ample time to view and identify a target.

A convoy can be seen and identified before shooting and since terrorists tend not to drive around in convoys one has to wonder what those people firing were thinking of.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 9/5/2006 12:00:00 PM >

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 11:58:41 AM   
MyMasterStephen


Posts: 219
Joined: 8/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

British fury at 'cowboy' US pilot's deadly error
March 31 2003, 10:21 AM

British soldiers injured when an American "tankbuster" aircraft attacked their convoy, killing one of their comrades, hit out angrily at the "cowboy" pilot today.
Troops wounded in Friday's attack accused the A-10 Thunderbolt pilot of "incompetence and negligence" while others privately called for a manslaughter prosecution.

Lance Corporal of Horse Steven Gerrard, speaking from his bed on the RFA Argus in the Gulf, said: "I can command my vehicle. I can keep it from being attacked. What I have not been trained to do is look over my shoulder to see whether an American is shooting at me."


There was a Union Jack on the back of one of the engineers' vehicles.
"It's about 18 inches wide by about 12 inches. For him to fire his weapons, I believe he had to look through his magnified optics. How he could not see that Union Jack I don't know."

Trooper Chris Finney, 18, added: "All the wagons have markings to say they are Coalition. I don't know why he shot a second time, he was that close.
"To be honest, I think they are just ignorant. I don't know if they haven't been trained or are just trigger happy."


Trooper Joe Woodgate, 19, the driver of the Scimitar in which gunner LCoH Hull was killed, walked away with holes in his bullet-proof vest and torn clothes.
He told The Guardian: "I don't suppose they have learned much from the first war. I can tell what an American tank looks like from every direction.
"How come somebody who is a top-notch Thunderbolt pilot can't tell what a British tank looks like?"

To be fair...

Another two British soldiers were killed when their Challenger 2 Main Battle tank was engaged by another British tank west of Basra.


Hmmmmmmm as I understand it a guy moving at high speed must spot a flag the size of a small safety poster from how far away?   OK   again   what happened to the laser recongnition devices on the british vehicles and soldiers?

and it seems the british are doing it to themselves in the same or similar same country tanks?  hmmmmmm  

It is bad no matter who or why it was done.  but unfortunately it does happen.  btw a couriosity question.   are they going to prosecute the british soldier for shooting at his buds?



If he cannot see a red-white-and-blue Union Flag against a sand-coloured background, then how can he see enough to positively identify the target as hostile?

If he cannot positively identify the target as hostile, then why is he engaging it?

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 12:15:48 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MyMasterStephen

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

quote:

ORIGINAL: CrappyDom

British fury at 'cowboy' US pilot's deadly error
March 31 2003, 10:21 AM

British soldiers injured when an American "tankbuster" aircraft attacked their convoy, killing one of their comrades, hit out angrily at the "cowboy" pilot today.
Troops wounded in Friday's attack accused the A-10 Thunderbolt pilot of "incompetence and negligence" while others privately called for a manslaughter prosecution.

Lance Corporal of Horse Steven Gerrard, speaking from his bed on the RFA Argus in the Gulf, said: "I can command my vehicle. I can keep it from being attacked. What I have not been trained to do is look over my shoulder to see whether an American is shooting at me."


There was a Union Jack on the back of one of the engineers' vehicles.
"It's about 18 inches wide by about 12 inches. For him to fire his weapons, I believe he had to look through his magnified optics. How he could not see that Union Jack I don't know."

Trooper Chris Finney, 18, added: "All the wagons have markings to say they are Coalition. I don't know why he shot a second time, he was that close.
"To be honest, I think they are just ignorant. I don't know if they haven't been trained or are just trigger happy."


Trooper Joe Woodgate, 19, the driver of the Scimitar in which gunner LCoH Hull was killed, walked away with holes in his bullet-proof vest and torn clothes.
He told The Guardian: "I don't suppose they have learned much from the first war. I can tell what an American tank looks like from every direction.
"How come somebody who is a top-notch Thunderbolt pilot can't tell what a British tank looks like?"

To be fair...

Another two British soldiers were killed when their Challenger 2 Main Battle tank was engaged by another British tank west of Basra.


Hmmmmmmm as I understand it a guy moving at high speed must spot a flag the size of a small safety poster from how far away?   OK   again   what happened to the laser recongnition devices on the british vehicles and soldiers?

and it seems the british are doing it to themselves in the same or similar same country tanks?  hmmmmmm  

It is bad no matter who or why it was done.  but unfortunately it does happen.  btw a couriosity question.   are they going to prosecute the british soldier for shooting at his buds?



If he cannot see a red-white-and-blue Union Flag against a sand-coloured background, then how can he see enough to positively identify the target as hostile?

If he cannot positively identify the target as hostile, then why is he engaging it?


I can only make assumptions since I was not there.   But I would assume that since under normal circumstances civilians don't travel in convoy with military style trucks (although they do have what could be easily recognized as military style trucks).  Secondly, they didn't have their laser devices on which show up on the pilots displays as friendly forces.   They could have had them covered up.   I know that on my sons uniform they are covered except in the field with velcrow covering tabs.  He had one on each arm near the shoulder.

now why would they attack?   Well again I can only go based upon assumptions.   What appeared to be a military convoy of non-friendlies with orders to shoot up the enemy, I would shoot too. 

(in reply to MyMasterStephen)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 12:19:20 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

now why would they attack?   Well again I can only go based upon assumptions.   What appeared to be a military convoy of non-friendlies with orders to shoot up the enemy, I would shoot too. 


Maybe this is why there are so many incidents of American troops firing on friendly troops and civilians. It is one of the British complaints that being so trigger happy is alienating the host population  from the occupation.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, woun... - 9/5/2006 12:24:11 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

now why would they attack?   Well again I can only go based upon assumptions.   What appeared to be a military convoy of non-friendlies with orders to shoot up the enemy, I would shoot too. 


Maybe this is why there are so many incidents of American troops firing on friendly troops and civilians. It is one of the British complaints that being so trigger happy is alienating the host population  from the occupation.


could be   I don't know.   based upon Crappy's stats with the US having the majority (I think it is like 75% of the troops) and haveing aboout 50% of the incidents then that means that 50% of the incidents more or less come from 25% of the other troops, so why is there no indignation about that?   Or is it because it is an opportunity to bash Americans again?

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Friendly fire in Afghanistan kills 1 Canadian, wounds more than 30 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109