KenDckey
Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MyMasterStephen quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey quote:
ORIGINAL: CrappyDom British fury at 'cowboy' US pilot's deadly error March 31 2003, 10:21 AM British soldiers injured when an American "tankbuster" aircraft attacked their convoy, killing one of their comrades, hit out angrily at the "cowboy" pilot today. Troops wounded in Friday's attack accused the A-10 Thunderbolt pilot of "incompetence and negligence" while others privately called for a manslaughter prosecution. Lance Corporal of Horse Steven Gerrard, speaking from his bed on the RFA Argus in the Gulf, said: "I can command my vehicle. I can keep it from being attacked. What I have not been trained to do is look over my shoulder to see whether an American is shooting at me." There was a Union Jack on the back of one of the engineers' vehicles. "It's about 18 inches wide by about 12 inches. For him to fire his weapons, I believe he had to look through his magnified optics. How he could not see that Union Jack I don't know." Trooper Chris Finney, 18, added: "All the wagons have markings to say they are Coalition. I don't know why he shot a second time, he was that close. "To be honest, I think they are just ignorant. I don't know if they haven't been trained or are just trigger happy." Trooper Joe Woodgate, 19, the driver of the Scimitar in which gunner LCoH Hull was killed, walked away with holes in his bullet-proof vest and torn clothes. He told The Guardian: "I don't suppose they have learned much from the first war. I can tell what an American tank looks like from every direction. "How come somebody who is a top-notch Thunderbolt pilot can't tell what a British tank looks like?" To be fair... Another two British soldiers were killed when their Challenger 2 Main Battle tank was engaged by another British tank west of Basra. Hmmmmmmm as I understand it a guy moving at high speed must spot a flag the size of a small safety poster from how far away? OK again what happened to the laser recongnition devices on the british vehicles and soldiers? and it seems the british are doing it to themselves in the same or similar same country tanks? hmmmmmm It is bad no matter who or why it was done. but unfortunately it does happen. btw a couriosity question. are they going to prosecute the british soldier for shooting at his buds? If he cannot see a red-white-and-blue Union Flag against a sand-coloured background, then how can he see enough to positively identify the target as hostile? If he cannot positively identify the target as hostile, then why is he engaging it? I can only make assumptions since I was not there. But I would assume that since under normal circumstances civilians don't travel in convoy with military style trucks (although they do have what could be easily recognized as military style trucks). Secondly, they didn't have their laser devices on which show up on the pilots displays as friendly forces. They could have had them covered up. I know that on my sons uniform they are covered except in the field with velcrow covering tabs. He had one on each arm near the shoulder. now why would they attack? Well again I can only go based upon assumptions. What appeared to be a military convoy of non-friendlies with orders to shoot up the enemy, I would shoot too.
|