SusanofO -> RE: Attitude (9/8/2006 5:02:34 AM)
|
omestandingstill: No problem. I haven't done this (yet). From what I've gathered, though) I am slowly coming to the conlcusion that one reason (not the only one, but I think it is one) that this kind of relationship is so "scarified" by many is that the Masters who sincerely desire it are really may be trying to be honest and sincere about what they know they are asking upfront. I think this can be viewed as a good thing. If they weren't trying to be honest, they wouldn't bother. And talking with them more will probably reveal if they know why they want (technically speaking) a slave vs. a submissive. To some I think it connotes the person will be more devoted, and they don't plan to "limit test" this day-in and day-out. Some say they do (but probably won't). Some will do it. Some people don't even realize there is a technical difference like yor question indicates, and they won't be able to tell you why, then. But - they still may expect you to "act like one" That could work - if they are an inspiring enough personality, I'd imagine. Hmmm. Bottom line. Find out what they want. Decide if you can give it to them. I know the whole attractive idea to some might be that they might not know what they want, and you'll have to do it anyway, anytime but - try to find out anyway. Some really do know. I think this really is a communication process. Unless you've already "declared yourself", you absolutely have a right to ask these questions. I know there are people who have had relationships with Masters where the slave felt they were often "reminded" they were actually of little value to a Master. I really do feel badly they feel they've failed, but I find my self still wanting to know - why do they? Reminded they are of little value? I thought slaves added value (I do, though, understand what you mean by the question. It's a god one, I think)..My Short answer (I'm tored and I know this may sound so obvious it ends up sounding stupid, but I mean it in the most literal, utmost sense - By really feeling a need to be there - any judgment or connotations about whether this is "right" or "wrong" aside (because that part doesn't ultimately matter, I guess). But - If they really do have no value, except in terms of filling their Master's needs, then they need to find the reason(s) they need to be there - and ask why and how it fulfills them wtih that particular person. Find out what attracts them to the relationship? I mean that particular person - not just the M/s relationship. Ultimately one is dealing with a person, not a "role" And they'd need to really feel a growing devotion to that Master, I think. *I mean this in the utmost literal sense, with no judgment of who is "right or wrong." Do they like giving personal attention vs. giving it? What is their definition of personal attention? What does this Master need? Do they inspire your devotion? Why? What is it about them you appreciate? Do they make you feel valued? Needed? I realize its in their terms in their own way - but does it happen currently? Are they going to be able to use your unique talents and encourage you to grow as a person? Ask themselves why they like being with that Master, or love serving them - and come up with some very personal answers, all judgment connotations about it aside. I thought Masters inspired slaves and confidence, too- can you envision this person doing that? I realize it's a give and take communication and devoted process between two people - but - can you envision it? In real, day-to-day terms? I thought the whole reason a Master has a slave was because they added some value to a Master's life. If they are not feeling this, I guess the ultimate bottom-line solution would be to leave, but -I just feel bad it happened. There is no need to internalize it as a "failure" - please don't let it be a static assessment of your character - because it's not, or doesn't have to be. Who said so? Who said so? That is a good question, I think. [:)] - Susan
|
|
|
|