FirmhandKY -> RE: Bush administration collars maker fetish films (9/9/2006 6:29:48 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster I personally prefer none of the above. Look, I have no objection to the idea that a Christian might consider his religion better than any other. It's a personal choice, and it's hardly reasonable for a Christian to say, you know, I really wish I was a Muslim, Islam is so much more appealing than the nonsense I believe. Christians who feel that way are free to become Muslims. Sometimes they do. But what I've noticed, and what makes no sense to me as a rhetorical strategy, is Christians who take the "We're no worse than anyone else" line when confronted with criticisms of Christianity or Christian behavior. Aside from the fact that it's defensive and defeatist, to me it represents a complete disavowal of everything that, at one time, made Christianity special. "We're no worse than anyone else" is hardly an inspiring credo. LaM, I understand and agree to a large extent. I don't think I've said anything defeatist and defensive. What I have attempted to do, primarily, is hold up a mirror to the posters who got all "holier than thou" about Christianity. I think your last post and this line of discussion is from something that julia posted. Sometimes the concept of "we are all just imperfect humans, regardless of our religion" appears close to the "all religions are pretty much the same" line of reasoning. I don't see them that way, however. And, actually, the fact that you hear "all religions are pretty much the same" from some Christians should tell you something of their humbleness. And that's just the opposite from what some of the posters have said about Christians, isn't it? However, I submit that all religions are not equal in the effects that they have on human society, and the ability of individuals to reach a high level of "self actualization". Also, there may be (or may have been) religions that might have made a better world than the one that Christianity produced ( theoretically). But the history of any religion seems to be tied up with other issues of power and politics within a society or civilization. The society that a religion "grows up in" has an effect on the impact, reach and growth (or death) of a religion and of the society it's in. A religion can be an impetus for growth in a civilization, or it can be a hinderance. Bascially, there is a synergy between a religion and a society. I've seen cogent arguments that the "problems" in Islamic countries is more of a problem with ancient bedouin culture, than with the words of the Koran. Because the roots of Islam are in that culture. Max Weber wrote a book years ago (The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism) about the synergy between Protestantism and Capitalism within Western society. The premise is that we probably wouldn't have this thing called "Capitalism" without the Reformation. I tend to agree. If nothing else, this simple concept of "free will" and "free markets" makes up (to me) for any of the atrocities that "Christians" have supposedly commited throughout history. Does this mean I condone the atrocities? No. But I certainly can't change them. I can't go back and change history. We live in the world we live in, shaped and molded by our Christian heritage. Write me down as pro-Christian. FHky
|
|
|
|