LotusSong -> RE: Woman President (9/9/2006 1:47:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Level Yes, if she was bright enough, had a mixture of compassion and strength, believed in self-responsibility as well as helping those that honestly needed help, and if she had great legs, that'd be okay too. (sigh) THAT'S what we thought we had with BUSH!! I think the rest of the word would welcome it..but here in America.. the "Good Ol Boys" club is still running the show. They are too immature. Oooooooooooh I could hear the debates now.. after they dig up dirt of any sort like "she wore WHAT to the prom?!" She's STILL menstruating????? Oh my! What about the PMS??? (a glaring example is post 9 below me) Any issues for debate would be lost in the cat-calls. Whoever it would be would have to a very strong woman to even attempt it to put up with that crap. It's been the opposition, not the woman candidate, that would make us look like fools (as if it could get worse after THIS presidency). It would depend on the maturity of the country concerning a woman candidate. We have a some very capable women out there. But I know this country is anal enough it will vote for the party that has the male candidate.. no matter how good the woman is. I don't see Hillary running.. if she did, she'd loose because of the specter of her husband's idiocy with Monica. I feel the best chance for the Democratic party to get in is a black male candidate (Obamma).. because there is noise that the Republicans are thinking about Condi as a possible candidate. Interesting..what if it was a Hilliary vs Condi race? I wouldn't vote for Condi because of her involvement with this administration. I don't trust ANYONE in the present cabinet. But I do like her. She'd have to prove to me she hasn't been tainted or that her ambitions are above self-interests. Hillary.. love her but she has too much baggage and no one would hear her above the jeers about the past. It's just dirty business all around.
|
|
|
|