NastyDaddy -> RE: What other words do you use for..... (9/14/2006 10:34:06 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LotusSong quote:
ORIGINAL: pqwinny Thank God my Sir asks me what's bothering me when He sees that i'm upset. There are two types of Dominants: Ones that know Submissives.. and those that THINK they know Submissives Actually there are three kinds of dominants... the two you mentioned and one's that think THEY know how ALL dominants should think. The latter are some of the worst because they carry a narrow mnded attitude on their shoulders and spend most of their time trying to bring others to their opinions, than bash them if unsuccessful. The squick example was not even close to a power dynamic relationship, it was totally opposite. Comparing it to any power dynamic between a dominant and sub was foolish, an emotionally foolish ploy that simply garnered breakfast club attention and nothing more. This is what happens when one closes off their mind. The next step is to tell everyone what D/s and M/s is all about... and try to convince others to narrow their minds and enjoy better bdsm. Better bdsm is achieved by an open mind and being able to accept things and deal with their "non-relevance" within a bdsm lifestyle. Would you call your sub "boy"? Yes, you even boastpost of doing so quite often... and there is no more wrong in calling YOUR sub "boy" or calling him "jane".... it is whatever the Dominant wishes to call the sub. Yet in the same moment should you take offense you are quick to use the loving label of "boy" as a detrimental term to fling at a male you get squicked at... irony is often illustrated vividly in actions, is it not? I personally don't care one iota what any dominant calls THEIR sub, after all having an open mind allows me to see beyond mere squickyness and "ewwww". Matter of fact, it bothers me little and amuses me more when those that think they are dominant sling their own squickyness at me or other dominants in attempts to prove some narrow minded point or opinion... it's sad yes but funny in the same vein. As I stated in my open minded post... that should "slut" NOT be an agreed limit BEFORE engaging in a bdsm dynamic... then the "oh I'm just so in-conflict" sub and I would have a fireside chat and see what their problem is. If it appears that this person is so insecure in themselves that a mere word terminates their submissiveness or subspace, then I as a dominant have three options.... 1) help the submissive to re-open that closed off portion of their mind, or 2) re-negotiate our relationship and re-define limits of my open mind controlled closed minded submissive.... or 3) do not accept their failures and send them packing. This entire concept of letting the submissive dictate the power exchange is simply over the top. What you suggest that be implimented as a safe verbal protocol is actually patronizing a weak submissive (back to the negotiations and if "slut" was NOT an agreed limit). I personally weed out such an emotionally fragile submissive during the negotiation process as any decent dominant should do, and therefore I don't encounter this big emotional shutdown/meltdown effect over a word. Encountering this actually tells me very much about the dominant and the submissive alike.... THEY didn't communicate and surprise... there's a surprise. Advocating open communications between the dominant and submissive is the best "advice" proffered thus far in this thread, and the negotiations process is a very important place in the relationship building process for communication to occur. Equally important to communication is maintaining an open mind, and NOT closing off one's mind. All we have seen really in this thread is a strong femdom based blast of "I Never!", and "The Nerve"... such squick emmanating from such wise femdoms is rather ironic when they boastpost of using the word "boy" as a term of endearment for their sub, as a humiliation tool for all male subs in general, and even further as a bash tool for other males they wish to battle, lol That's a fine example of three different uses of one little word, while staunchly advocating non-use of another word by other dominants. This wreaks of hypocrisy femdoms, you are what you act according to Forest Gump. Another funny thing I see often (daily) is the femdom squad pushing this projected double-standard in tag-team fashion which resembles ambulance chasing... woof woof, let's barky bark and snarl or be coy and attempt to make this concept valid. That's funny ladies and I really do enjoy the performances, thank you for not dissapointing in THAT respect. I do however wish you were capable of seperating yourselves from your squicks and simply be "open minded" like you freely advovcate when you feel it fits... try it for real as an on-going process... it actually works if you are receptive and have an open mind, yet remain dominant. Please quit trying to tell me what bdsm is all about when you see an opprtunity to push your own agenda... if you wish to be open minded then perhaps we can make some progress. If you want bdsm, then be able to stand bdsm. If you can't stand or handle bdsm, then perhaps your meddle is not real meddle and your recreational meddling is not the meddle product of an open mind. Essentially, it's all very silly.... knee-jerks of emotion... and as a dominant it is my perogative to accept or deny such sillyness and squickyness in my dynamic. I choose the latter because the former makes me non-dominant in the absence of agreed limits. Rather than shouting "don't take it girl"... and "don't even let HIM call you girl" (battle cries)... it would be more advantageous to open your own minds, get over it and your own insecurities before cranking out your daily "advice for the lovelorn". I just love being TOLD how to treat MY "girl".... especially by the all-knowing amazing double-standard "Uh Oh Squad".... woohoo! [:D]
|
|
|
|