tasha_tart -> RE: Long distance Rela. who goes where when the time is right? (12/26/2005 12:52:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: foxglove716 Like most of you, worth doesnt play a part for me here. If we make a commitment to meet, he has already proven his worth to me and I to him. But I personally would rather not meet halfway, especially in very long distances, because I would rather have at least one of us to know the meeting place well, instead of picking an unknown city off the map. I think this is just one of those things thats different for everyone, it just comes down to what makes *you* more comfortable. Listen to advice given, usually its pretty good stuff, but always first and foremost trust your instincts. That is a very good point. Unless one or the other knows the "neutral" site well, it could be an added complication. It also nearly doubles the total cost, when two sets of accomodation are figured in. Of course if both people are explorer types, it could work out very well. Personally, I prefer to do the travelling myself. I live in a town of about 6000, and have to drive a minimum of 2 hours or so just to get to a munch, so driving a couple of hours for coffee is no big deal. I think my personal "best" is five-and-a-half hours each way in one day. Having said that, it would be nice to come across someone who was interested enough in me to offer to come out to the boonies to meet me. Another point, and again speaking only for myself...if I have done the travelling, and the meeting reveals an incompatibility that had not been evident earlier, then I can walk. I can play tourist, explore, veg in front of the hotel TV, whatever. Maybe it's selfishness on my part, but that means I don't have any responsibility for another's travel experience should it turn out we just don't get along. Tasha
|
|
|
|