Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/28/2006 9:33:01 PM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
I can control with the merest arch of my eyebrow and while at times in control of myself, there are things that make me lose control and there are times I let myself lose control.

The sight of a perfect rack of baby lamb or a perfectly carmelized creme brulee, or that sight of a perfectly smooth pair of lips peaking out from between the legs of a beautiful woman spread eagled are all things that at times can push me over the edge.

I also let myself go as when I post sarcastic and antagonistic posts in the idiots lounge here.

But there are times one needs control.  In the midst of passion you are playing with someones wife and you know she would let you do something to her you want to do but you also know she has never let her husband do it.  The erotic potential and the rush of power are pretty strong and yet that is exactly one of those times where you need to step out of yourself and seize control and say "nope, not gonna go there" and step away.

Being a good or talented dominant takes control, not perfect control, but still more control than most people have.  However I don't think that it must be this broad sense of perfection that some here claim is required.  I have seen plenty of happy long term relationships where there is plenty of imperfection going on.  To me, the ones who strive to control everything, to always have discipline are the one who either go batty or are batty.

YMMV

(in reply to Frank01)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/28/2006 9:52:31 PM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

quote:

This discussion reminds me of a recent political occurrence. Does anyone else see the similarity?


LOL... I was thinking along the same line!
 
~J


Oh, that hit me when I first read your OP. I got it. :)

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/28/2006 10:47:24 PM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

I do think this is a worthy ideal to aspire to, but not just for dominants.  I think it is a worthy ideal for people in general no matter what type of relationship they like to be in.

Knight's kyra


Self-control is a character strength that is of value to anyone.  However, self-control is not absolutely obtainable... but we never get better at it if we don't apply effort to strenghten it.

Self-control or to use other similiear terms such as Self-Discipine or Will Power are just strengths of a person that make it easier to suceed that which we are motivated towards.  No different than many other character strengths.  pity the Dominant or submissive person with week character strengths... they can work twice as hard with have to settle for less results than the person with strong character strengths.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to kyraofMists)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 3:20:13 AM   
mons


Posts: 2400
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
greetings
 
i spoke of this myself i use to go to a chatroom where the dommes or i think they were dommes but they were so mean so nasty to anyone new in the room i remember my spelling and word placment is a mess but i am trying do hard to do right but they attacked me so bad i thought what in the world so i told them" if you can not control you angry in the room you have no control if you can not conmtrol you, you have no control over anyone. and i remember they had mean ways and if someone wanted answer they use foul words and they would all laugh also they had submissive men in the room the submissive thought if i join thsi domme in making fun of who ever they pick i would be in good graces with her. i had not respect for anyone of this women or the submissives men who came along for the word when i came here i saw contol in many it is a big different the help to other, question are answer in a very control way . your so right control must be held to control anyone you pick as a partner i have control and i find it worker wonders
 
losing control it so bad
 
mons

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 4:13:56 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
We definitively do have to deliniate between someone "attacking" another person and 'losing control' of themself or their emotions.
 
Just because someone is "mean and nasty" is no reason to believe that they are not in control of themselves and their actions...
 
I am a son of a bitch to people at times. It is not because I have suddenly "lost control of my bladder" that I am spewing about... but, because I chose to be demonstrative in that manner for one reason or another (most often for effect and interest).
 
Granted, I sooner try pointed humor to bring the issue to bear, but I will not hesitate to 'levy heavy' if and when deserved or required - but, that is myself... and, others may resort to being direct and (what someone would consider) "mean" immediately to get a point across (or, as is so often seen: because they somehow believe that is the way they "should" act <---sad really)
 
Being angry, sad, pissy, or exhuberant is not an absolute indication of someone losing control... simply of their emotional state at the time....(or, they may be being manipulative)
 
Let's not confuse the issues of being demonstrative, being an asshole, and being out of control.. they are (in my experience with people on line and off [I work in NYC ]) not the same things.
 
~J

< Message edited by LordODiscipline -- 9/29/2006 4:17:33 AM >


_____________________________

"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential."
William Thomas

(in reply to mons)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 8:21:40 AM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

So - in this instance and by your definition, someone cannot be dominant unless all of their base and higher needs are fulfilled prior to the time their personality is set (would that be a genetic imprinting or socialization set?) -and- any emotional abheration to the very essence of "cool" is a determination of the individual's inability to continue in a dominant role - and, when he finds himself thussly compromised, he might be swayed from his path for enlightenment by the guiles of a wanton scheming woman?




To expound, we must hold ourselves accountable for our own choices and actions. We must force ourselves to bear witness to the truth of things, as painful as it may be—to not be caught up in little daydreams and mental chatter that distracts from our own control. We should seek to build from the inside outward, and not outside inward, for as those Smashing Pumpkins once sang, "the world is a vampire."




(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 8:32:39 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

To expound, we must hold ourselves accountable for our own choices and actions. We must force ourselves to bear witness to the truth of things, as painful as it may be—to not be caught up in little daydreams and mental chatter that distracts from our own control. We should seek to build from the inside outward, and not outside inward, for as those Smashing Pumpkins once sang, "the world is a vampire."


Rather a Calvinistic approach to the entire thing; but, (and don't get me wrong) not far off hte mark from my stance.
 
However - rigidity of character is a demon just as assured.
 
Holding oneself responsible is indeed to be considered laudable and meritocrious for the entire self... but, forgiveness is key to stability in all things. As we cannot bear a burden constantly compounded by our personal humanity and fallibility.
 
However - and, you should understand - complete 'self actualiztion' as you touted as a strict requisite in your earlier missel is not something most people may attain (by definition) - therefore it cannot be a realistic requisite for someone's attainment of (idealistic/idyllic) control...
 
We have to consider (once again) that personal humanity is something which we cannot escape - and allow that what we have is to be "enough" - seeking control as best as possible and understanding that the development of a facade is not the goal - but, the attainment of structural underpinnings that will (despite the addition of the proverbial clay to the aggregate) be "enough" to surmount our own failing where it shall assuredly occur.
 
~J

< Message edited by LordODiscipline -- 9/29/2006 8:35:24 AM >


_____________________________

"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential."
William Thomas

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 10:00:38 AM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

quote:

To expound, we must hold ourselves accountable for our own choices and actions. We must force ourselves to bear witness to the truth of things, as painful as it may be—to not be caught up in little daydreams and mental chatter that distracts from our own control. We should seek to build from the inside outward, and not outside inward, for as those Smashing Pumpkins once sang, "the world is a vampire."



Rather a Calvinistic approach to the entire thing; but, (and don't get me wrong) not far off the mark from my stance.

However - rigidity of character is a demon just as assured.

Holding oneself responsible is indeed to be considered laudable and meritocrious for the entire self... but, forgiveness is key to stability in all things. As we cannot bear a burden constantly compounded by our personal humanity and fallibility.

However - and, you should understand - complete 'self actualiztion' as you touted as a strict requisite in your earlier missel is not something most people may attain (by definition) - therefore it cannot be a realistic requisite for someone's attainment of (idealistic/idyllic) control...



In my mind, an ideal Master or Mistress is not cut of common cloth. They should—and the good ones often do—seek out and hone qualities within themselves that are above the ordinary, for it is beneficial to come as close to actualized as mortals may. Good judgment is crucial in one who is followed, even more so in one who keeps other human beings as pets or slaves. Sovereignty of mind, nobility, strength, and yes, empathy, are qualities in another I know I find easy to bow to. One who is easily manipulated or torn from his perch masters nothing, in the end.



< Message edited by amayos -- 9/29/2006 10:01:38 AM >

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 10:21:32 AM   
Frank01


Posts: 270
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline
There is a difference between rigidity and common sense. One can be firm in thier actualization of purpose, and still make allowances for disparate qualities in material one deals with.

But when the clay molds the potter, he no longer is.

< Message edited by Frank01 -- 9/29/2006 10:28:23 AM >

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 10:28:37 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

In my mind, an ideal Master or Mistress is not cut of common cloth. They should—and the good ones often do—seek out and hone qualities within themselves that are above the ordinary, for it is beneficial to come as close to actualized as mortals may. Good judgment is crucial in one who is followed, even more so in one who keeps other human beings as pets or slaves. Sovereignty of mind, nobility, strength, and yes, empathy, are qualities in another I know I find easy to bow to. One who is easily manipulated or torn from his perch masters nothing, in the end


Well -
 
I do not subscribe to the "Idealistic or Nothing" mind set - it is 'on line' supported and enhanced absolutist false rhetoric such as that which so often leads people to being absolutely disappointed when they first venture out into the world in search of people and organizations and  - well - reality.

We can strive for ideals - that is what life is about...

 
..but, there are few 'Uber Menches' alloted on this plane in this life - and, I have never met one involved in BDSM.

Give me an honest, humble, and chaste person any day over a vaunted self described and alleged saint (*or, Grand Master) for an associate - at least my friend shall be honest with himself.

 
Something many of our bretheren are unable to see or be.


~J


< Message edited by LordODiscipline -- 9/29/2006 10:30:22 AM >


_____________________________

"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential."
William Thomas

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 10:31:06 AM   
Frank01


Posts: 270
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

quote:

In my mind, an ideal Master or Mistress is not cut of common cloth. They should—and the good ones often do—seek out and hone qualities within themselves that are above the ordinary, for it is beneficial to come as close to actualized as mortals may. Good judgment is crucial in one who is followed, even more so in one who keeps other human beings as pets or slaves. Sovereignty of mind, nobility, strength, and yes, empathy, are qualities in another I know I find easy to bow to. One who is easily manipulated or torn from his perch masters nothing, in the end


Well - I do not subscribe to the "Idealistic or Nothing" mind set - it is on line supported and enhanced absolutist rhetoric which so often leads people to being absolutely disappointed when they first venture out into the world in search of people and organizations and  - well - reality.

We can strive for ideals - but, there are few 'Uber Menches' alloted in this life - and, I have never met one involved in BDSM.

Give me an honest, humble, and chaste person any day over a vaunted self described and alleged saint (*or, Grand Master) for an associate - at least my friend shall be honest with himself.

~J


You can be a real person, and still hold yourself to a standard.

The apologists for disheveled living never impressed me all that much. Then again, excuses for mediocrity never do.

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Rhetoric? - 9/29/2006 11:10:37 AM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

I do not subscribe to the "Idealistic or Nothing" mind set - it is 'on line' supported and enhanced absolutist false rhetoric such as that which so often leads people to being absolutely disappointed when they first venture out into the world in search of people and organizations and - well - reality.



Obviously, my words are lost here a second time, and while I do appreciate your articulate candor, I emphatically suggest quite the opposite: it is surely the lack of a noble personal standard, accountability and meeting the highest ideal possible within oneself which sows disappointment with many who seek to own or be owned.

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 11:14:22 AM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
Yeah, it could be the perfect person is one not so perfect. I don’t think a great artist could create without the experience of his own imperfections and overwhelming desires. Great books come from dark souls.

In addition, others recognize these imperfections as being normal and even desirable.  Give me brilliant, emotional, wine drinking, poetry reading and edge living people any day. Give me intellectual Jerry Springer types. I don’t want to hang out with Madison Ave. created perfect people.

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Rhetoric? - 9/29/2006 11:24:25 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Obviously, my words are lost here a second time, and while I do appreciate your articulate candor, I emphatically suggest quite the opposite: it is surely the lack of a noble personal standard, accountability and meeting the highest ideal possible within oneself which sows disappointment with many who seek to own or be owned.


Thank you for your patience... I definitively misread your statement and I agree whole heartedly with yur assessment.
 
~J

_____________________________

"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential."
William Thomas

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 11:34:44 AM   
DoctorDubious


Posts: 267
Joined: 6/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline



The question:
 
Do you think that a dominant must be in complete control of themselves at all times in order to be a "good" dominant?
 



 
 



Greetings all... "Controllers' and "Controlled"..

As many have pointed out,
"complete control and all times"
only exists in comic books, and Gor novels.

Humans ain't built that way.

But even more to the point,
who dafuck would want a relationship
with a frozen fish like that.... no passion, no spontenaity, no lust...?

Star Trek's Mr. Spock
had a distant and emotionally unevailable father
(which for a Vulcan is saying something)
but even that cryogenic dude would have more "juice"
than the robot the OP is speculating about.

DD, an only moderately "controlled" old goat

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 12:19:19 PM   
Frank01


Posts: 270
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline
Hmmmmmmmmm..............

Back to the dimissive iceberg theory, are we? Can't there be some sort of middle ground between someone with the emotional content of a three year old, and Mr Spock?

(in reply to DoctorDubious)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 2:38:44 PM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Yeah, it could be the perfect person is one not so perfect. I don’t think a great artist could create without the experience of his own imperfections and overwhelming desires. Great books come from dark souls.



What is a great artist? What is darkness? Nobility is not solely owned by the "light." My favorite Rakes, Sirens and Devils are those who choose to be what they are. Evil is relative, and even the good of some.

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 2:57:42 PM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
Seperate issue entirely - but, motivation and resultants do have quantifiers that are not ambiguous in many instances.
 
Life is not all gray and relative... and, things are often 'good' and 'evil' with the standard connotation and no fuzzy logic attached.
 
Shroedinger's cat is often just as dead as dead imagined.

~J


_____________________________

"Anyone who thinks they're important is usually just a pompous moron who can't deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential."
William Thomas

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" - 9/29/2006 5:05:30 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

Being angry, sad, pissy, or exhuberant is not an absolute indication of someone losing control... simply of their emotional state at the time....(or, they may be being manipulative)
 



Hello A/all,

This is exactly true.

Screaming at the person serving your food in a restaurant because they brought you Manhattan Clam Chowder instead of New England Clam Chowder.  Beating somebody to a bloody pulp because they cut you off in traffic.  Or my personal favorite which one of my co-workers told me today:

She went over to her soon to be ex-husband's house.  They got into a screaming match.  He walked away when she tried to slap him.

So she got into her car and drove it into the side of his new truck, smashing the front end of her car (I saw it) and probably enough damage to total the truck.

Then she screamed where she was working and drove off.

Felony hit and run.

These are examples of losing control.  It is not what you feel that determines loss of control.  It is what you DO with those feelings
that matters.

Just me, could be wrong, etc.

Sinergy


_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Actualization - 9/29/2006 5:53:33 PM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: amayos
Evil is relative, and even the good of some.


True, so we end up with what appeals to each of us individually.

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094