CrappyDom
Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006 From: Sacramento Status: offline
|
[/link] Our Hollow Army by [link=http://leevank.dailykos.com/]leevank [Subscribe] Tue Sep 26, 2006 at 07:56:24 PM PDT This is a day old, but I don't see that it was diaried yesterday, and I definitely think it's worth knowing about. Yesterday, the New York Times had an excellent article entitled Unit Makes Do As Army Strives To Plug Gaps, dealing with the situation of the 3rd Infantry Division, which is now preparing for a likely third tour in Iraq. It paints a very sobering picture, and fleshes out, in more detail concerning a single division, what the 3 retired officers testified to in yesterdays hearing held by the Senate Democratic Policy Committee leevank's diary :: :: Although they can't legally criticize the administration, the senior officers of the 3rd ID were surpisingly open about the problems they are having, and the effect on their readiness. Col. Tom James, who commands the division's Second Brigade, acknowledged that his unit's equipment levels had fallen so low that it now had no tanks or other armored vehicles to use in training and that his soldiers were rated as largely untrained in attack and defense. Think about that for a moment: The Army's doctrine since shortly after Vietnam has been that units need to train together, and that it's not enough to take a soldier who has been through basic training, plunk him into a unit, and expect that unit to function effectively. But these guys CAN'T train together, because their equipment is in Iraq, and they really can't effectively train without equipment. And not only is the Second Brigade without equipment, it is seriously short of men, and much as the Army is trying to make do with computer simulations, it's hardly the same thing: The enormous strains on equipment and personnel, because of longer-than-expected deployments, have left active Army units with little combat power in reserve. The Second Brigade, for example, has only half of the roughly 3,500 soldiers it is supposed to have. The unit trains on computer simulators, meant to recreate the experience of firing a tank's main gun or driving in a convoy under attack. "It's a good tool before you get the equipment you need," Colonel James said. But a few years ago, he said, having a combat brigade in a mechanized infantry division at such a low state of readiness would have been "unheard of." Is this an isolated situation in the Second Brigade of the Third ID? Not exactly: Other than the 17 brigades in Iraq and Afghanistan, only two or three combat brigades in the entire Army -- perhaps 7,000 to 10,000 troops -- are fully trained and sufficiently equipped to respond quickly to crises, said a senior Army general. Apparently, two of the four brigades in the Third ID are in pretty much the same situation of having no equipment and far short of their full complement of troops, while the other two have received nearly all of their required equipment and nearly all of their complement of troops, but many of the troops are very raw, having just completed basic training. The overall picture isn't a pretty one: Since this summer, 1,000 soldiers a month have been arriving at Fort Stewart, 400 of them just out of basic training. As a result, the First and Third Brigades are now at or near their authorized troop strength, but many of the soldiers are raw. The two brigades started receiving tanks and other equipment to begin training in the field only in the last month, leaving the division only partly able to respond immediately if called to Korea, General Lynch said. "I'm confident two of the four brigade combat teams would say, `O.K., let's go,' " General Lynch said in an interview. "The Second and Fourth Brigades would say, `O.K., boss, but we've got no equipment. What are we going to use?' So we'd have to figure out where we're going to draw their equipment." And the Third ID is an active duty unit. The situation in the National Guard is even worse. The New York Times had another excellent article on the situation in the National Guard yesterday in an article entitled Strained, Army Looks To Guard For More Relief. The difficulty is that the National Guard is in even worse shape than the active duty Army. Given the lengthy lead time required for calling up, training, equipping and deploying Guard forces, Pentagon officials said that if more Guard members were mobilized, it would probably be for a rotation that begins in 2008. Even so, Pentagon and military officials said that it was unlikely that any decision on a Guard mobilization would be necessary for several months or even into next year, which would place any announcement beyond the November mid-term Congressional elections. To take on a greater load in Iraq and remedy existing equipment shortfalls, the Guard needs $23 billion over five years, Guard officials say. "There is no brigade in the United States Army active, Guard or reserve that is completely ready back at home," General Blum [the head of the National Guard Bureau] said. "That is to ensure that every brigade overseas is completely ready. And by ready I mean completely equipped. Right now, the key to readiness of the total force is equipping it, resetting it and modernizing it. It is a function of time and money." If you doubt the seriousness of the equipment shortages, I suggest that you drive past the closest National Guard armory to wherever you live. Last week, I happened to drive past our local National Guard armory for the first time in quite a while, the parking lot of which has normally been at least half full of Humvees and trucks. The lot was completely empty, which I assume means that the equipment is in Iraq, even though the unit isn't currently deployed there. It's about time for those on the right who give lip service to "supporting the troops" to begin REALLY supporting them -- by either reducing our military commitments to a level that can be sustained with our present level of spending, or by telling their wealthy supporters that they're going to have to forego a few of those tax reductions in order to spend the money to build a much bigger, well-equipped military that can sustain the current level of military activity
|