CreoleCook
Posts: 321
Joined: 10/9/2005 Status: offline
|
I would consider myself worldly, even though I can honestly say I've never been to greece, or athens, or egypt, or china. I know in other parts of the world nudity iis NOT considered to be against any laws. Public intimacy, perhaps, not nudity. So here many of us sit, in the "new world," discussing ethical decisions made by others, concerning the morals and values of others, in support of, or in digust of a sculpture which is molded in a nude pose. Who are we, to stand judgement over what most of the rest of the world already knows? ahh yes.... because this country was founded on judeo-christian beliefs, and thus, nudity leads to thoughts of sin... and thoughts of sin lead to sin, thus a=b, and b=c, then a=c. I wonder why those same judeo-chrisian beliefs do not question the bible as infallible, using the same theorom, but then, that's right.... we're not supposed to discuss religion and politics in chat forums, because of the variety of perspectives involved. With that said, all I will say in defense of the teacher involved... as each and every one of you know, as I do, media will exploit any angle to sell more newspapers. The teacher could have been a senile old bird who didn't believe in lesson plans, taught one way, and was unwilling to join the 21st century. Th teacher could have messed around with the superintendants wife, or husband, or son/daughter for that matter... these are all hypotheticals, but instead of publically announcing the reason why tenure was denied, or dismissal was warranted, the school system decided to keep it discreet. Short of actually being there, and knowing the truth behind the story, we'll never know why... CC
_____________________________
"If I owned Texas, and Hell, I would rent out Texas, and live in Hell." ~Gen. John Sheridan, 1855 "I was thinking of the immortal words of socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'" ~Chris Knight, Real Genius
|