GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Tasking a submissive or slave (9/29/2006 10:36:58 AM)
|
I have done this, (tasked a submissive/slave) and will continue to do so. I am in the M/s relationship camp, so I will refer to the "s" side as *slave*. Although the task is meant to keep the slave focused, for Me it also has a deeper purpose. Ability to make the extra effort and show obedience and a good "follow through" ethic. Some may consider this micro-managing, and perhaps it is in a way. But it is also a learning curve, especially in the beginning, and shows the willingness. I could give specific examples, but I prefer not to do that. For example, if I give a slave a task, with a reasonable time to complete this, and it is not completed, but I hear excuses or "I tried but..." this may be an indication to Me that this is not important enough, therefore disobedience ensues. I always try to not give anything that is too hard, and try to give enough time to get things completed. I also work to make the tasks something that is beneficial to the slave's growth. Obedience is important to Me. If I see consistent failing along with excuses, I have to take this as a lack of priority and a personal decision on the slave's part that My request is not that important. I have had some question why the tasks are no longer given. Unfortunately, it is hard, as a Dominant, to continue to task a "trainee", when the original tasks were never completed. What is the point? It is hard, sometimes even heartbreaking, on both sides of the whip. ** Edited to add ** quote:
ORIGINAL: deltadawn Tasks are given to me when they are needed to be given, earlier in the relationship they were regularly given and were part of the "deeper surrender". I like this, and it goes along with My learning curve comment. Thank you for expressing it so well.
|
|
|
|