marieToo -> RE: do slaves have a gender? (10/2/2006 9:49:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Frank01 quote:
ORIGINAL: marieToo quote:
ORIGINAL: Frank01 quote:
ORIGINAL: houseslave am honored that You would say so SIR.. Yw........I must admit that I am a bit jaded over the "pussy rules all" attitude that I see in so many female "slaves." Sex is just a small part of what it means to be a servant. When you make it clear that an owner has every bit as much right NOT to use them sexually-as he does-you end up running a lot of the manure off of that big heap we have to dig through. For some, sex is part of it, for others its not. I dont think either is right or wrong, but I can understand the mindset of gender not being of any relevance to service. I personally have been in both types of relationships. One where I was used exclusively sexually and one where I wasnt used sexually at all. Frankly, I found both to be rewarding. And I dont think there is a "pussy rules all" attitude any more or less than a "cock rules all" attitude. Some people are only out for sex others are not, others want something more substantial, whether in wittwd or vanilla. Most people are sexually oriented, lets face that fact first and foremost, and lets stop making it something dirty when someone (even a sub/slave/servent) is conscious of his/her/its sexuality and wants to live a life where they get to express it. I never said sex was dirty. Only that a slave should understand that the perogatives of the owner have priority. I can fuck my slaves or not, it's entirely my call. And they know what sort they are getting involved with. Call me paranoid, insecure, whatever derogatory statements most use to denote having a clear understanding of requirements.....that disagree with thiers. Under my roof, I am head of household-my ways apply. And those who wish to remain under that roof follow them, no excuses. Understood, Sir...um....I mean SIR. lmaoo oh.... and its *prerogative, not perogative <btw are you caretakr??>
|
|
|
|