maybemaybenot
Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NaughtyPrincess i have to agree with you, michael. It seems that those who need to wear their religion on their cars, clothes, etc are the most clueless as to what tolerance means. While I agree in general with Michael, in that if Christ came down an saw bumper stickers and a * cheapening* of Christ, he would be pretty sad; I think your intolerance statement is very inaccurate. I wear a cross around my neck, so that maks me intolerant, but one who wears a scarf on her head or a sari is tolerant ? You adorn your body with a tatoo of the BDSM symbol, and another adorns theirs with a portrait of Christ, and that means you are tolerant and the other is not? One who wears a hajib is more tolerant than the one who wears a habit? Sorry, some people choose to wear symbols of their own faith. That does not, in and of itself, make them exclusive or intolerant of others practices. The fact that you seem to have a problem with Christians wearing a symbol of their faith... seems a bit intolerant to me. mbmbn PS: the use of the word " cheapening of Christ" is my POV and my opion only
< Message edited by maybemaybenot -- 9/30/2006 11:54:52 AM >
_____________________________
Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.
|